BlogsHow To Fishing Blogs

“Must Bring Along” Fluke Fishing Outfits

This is a somewhat complicated topic to discuss, as it calls into play personal preference as well as specific fishing techniques. I’ll simplify it, by dividing it into two categories. Let’s look at fluke outfits, inshore and off.

I’ll begin by saying that prior to the past three seasons I’d never been a big proponent of using spinning gear for bottom fishing. Those that fish with me on the Lep have usually tended to agree, finding little reason to bring along a spinning rig. Oft-times we’d watch guys in other boats using spinners, on both the deep and shallower grounds, whilst poking fun at their alleged “googan” status.

Am I a Googan?


Yeah, well, I’ve seen the error of my ways, so guess I’m now officially a googan – and it only took 50 years to achieve that prestigious status. This, because I have come to really enjoy using spinning tackle to hunt bottom species, particularly our flat friends.

In an effort to keep it interesting while maintaining good lure action, I’ve spent a solid amount of time experimenting with deep water spin-jigging. Not just to add to my overall skill set, but also to put some extra fish in the box on those days that find the drift conditions to be sub-par. Needless to say, it has been an unqualified success. After making several adjustments to my tackle and presentation.

As anyone that has followed this board (or the old one, over on the “other” site) is probably aware, fluke hunting is my numero uno passion. I like fishing ‘em inshore well enough, in the bays and up in the Sound. Both of which methods I’ve rarely partaken of in recent seasons. What I really do find interesting is finding and fishing them in deep water. And there’s no shortage of suitable bottom outside Jones Inlet, my home grounds.

Putting My Crew On The Fish!


Be it over smooth sand or obstructed bottom, I find no greater satisfaction in this sport than putting my crew on better fluke, offshore.

As an aside, some that fish with me think as a captain I’m too intense when on the grounds. That I don’t enjoy the fishing as much as I should. That might actually be true, as I do find that I really cannot relax until we start boxing some decent fish. Getting the ball rolling, so to speak. Once that happens, I can joke around with the best of them. But, not until then. Hey, “game-face time” is a real thing.

This is why having a “conditions-appropriate” tackle aboard is very important to me. Not only does it greatly aid in the proper presentation of the lures, but it can also assist in the boating of better fish. Dropping good fish half-way to the boat is just a fact of life when deep jigging. Who knows just how well a fish is hooked? Or if its even hooked in the mouth at all? No one can say. Using a rod that has the cushion to absorb big head shakes will tend to cut down on those lost fish. This is a very important point.

Inshore Fluking


Being a “stream of consciousness” kind of writer, I’m doing a bit of jumping around, so let me steer back to the point of this post. For inshore fluking, I do not believe it’s all that critical to have super-tuned tackle. A basic 2500-sized spinning reel, or 200-sized bait casting reel, mounted to an appropriate rod is more than sufficient.

Smaller baits, lesser tides, shallower water – this is the place for the lighter stuff. I have two outfits that I think are about perfect for this sort of inshore/bay fishing. In a spinner I like my first-gen Shimano Stradic Ci4 2500F, mounted on a Shimano Trevala-S rod, in the “L” power. In a casting outfit – a Curado 200E5 on the same Shimano Trevala-S “L” rod, in the casting version, of course! These little fairy-wand rods are still as good as any factory-built sticks I’ve seen out there. They are well worth seeking out. Even though they’ve been recently discontinued by Shimano in favor of the new Trevala PX series. These are now trickling into the various local tackle shops. So those are my inshore choices.

Offshore Fluking


Offshore fluking is a whole ‘nother thing – and I’ve gone thru BOODLES of rod and reel combos over the past 20 seasons, in order to arrive at where I’m at these days. Though I have many premo setups assembled and ready to go during the deep fluke season, inclusive of some very big dollar customs, there are three specific setups that will make every single trip with me this coming season. And all of them are centered around factory-built rods. Huh! Fancy that!

The first is my trusty Jigging World Ghost Hunter 150gram slow jigger, carrying a very custom Daiwa Zillion HLC, tricked out per this thread:

O.K., Here We Go Again – a New Deep Fluking Reel Build

This outfit is whisper-light in the hand, yet has the stones to fish most “average-condition” days outside. The rod features a gorgeous, deep bend while pulling on a good one, while having just the right amount of “tip” to properly pop a 4oz buck tail in 80’ of water. Over the past four or five seasons it has brought many outsized fluke to the net, without drama.

The second outfit that MUST come along is my Black Hole Charter Special Slow Pitch bait caster, carrying my also heavily-modded Daiwa Zillion Coastal. This reel features the same 4.9:1 gears as the previously-mentioned Zillion HLC (both gear sets added by me), as well as many other improvements in bearings, drags and handles. See some info on this here:

New Handle/Knobs on two old Favorites

Rock and Roll


When things go to heck offshore, when its “rock and roll” time and the drift sock has to go in the water, this outfit is my go-to. No worries properly working a 6oz. jig or 8oz sinker on a B/S rig. It’s got the stones to handle its business, on any but the most extreme of days.

Though it presents as a fairly stout blank, this rod features a deep, moderate bend when hooked to a good one – the better to cushion the head shakes of a plus-sized fish, while rolling around on a tough-conditions day.

Really a nice outfit for those sort of trips – and face it, what with the “accuracy” of NOAA forecasts these days, sooner or later we all end up fishing on less than perfect days. Like I’ve repeatedly written, if conditions deteriorate, I’m NOT going home. We fish though, even if it means holding on with one hand and fishing with the other.

This is because over the years I’ve found that there’s some sort of weird relationship between rough conditions offshore, and a substantial uptick in the intensity of the deep fluke bite. I have no real idea why this is – perhaps it’s the increase in oxygenation of the water during rough conditions. Or maybe it’s the lack of boat traffic. I really have no clue but it happens A LOT. Slow fishing while the seas are fairly moderate, the wind comes up, conditions go to hell, and the better fluke begin to put on a show.

Hey, why fight it?


Isn’t it better to come home a little beat up, with a full fish box, than pull off the grounds early and have nothing to show for your week of waiting for that carefully-planned weekend trip? Hence the need for a quality heavy fluke outfit that can get it done on those tougher-conditions days. So that’s two “must-bring outfits.”

Now, back to spinning gear on the offshore grounds. This has become my pet obsession – my latest “fishin’ fetish,” so to speak. As I wrote earlier, I never really grasped the need for a spinning rig in the deep. But my thinking has changed over the past three seasons, as there is no better way to cover ground on those “no-drift” days than by casting about the boat with a suitably light leadhead/GULP combo. Not in my opinion anyway.

Several multi-season threads


As documented in several multi-season threads on this board, I’ve gone thru a bit of a search to find just the right rod and reel to best suit my tastes and needs, fishing my area’s deep grounds. Much of it can be seen here:

New IT&T Board Feature – Hands-on Tackle Reviews 2019/2020

After consulting with one of my local go-to sources, namely John at Trophy Tackle in West Babylon, I began my investigation with his recommended Daiwa Harrier Slow Pitch MH spinner. It was paired with a Tsunami Evict 2000 spinning reel. This turned out to be a KILLER outfit, for relatively short coin. The rod is just $99, which one has to admit is a fairly modest ask for a quality rod. I used this outfit for an entire season on the deeper drops catching PLENTY of fluke during those slow-drift days. In fact, I would say that this technique did save the day more than once, with the “cast way out there and jig back to the boat” technique putting quite a few quality fish in the box.

The Tackle Ho


Over the following off-season I did succumb to my base “tackle ho” instincts, looking to further improve on an already-fine setup. I finally settled on upgrading to a Black Hole Challenger Bank 6’9” UL stick. This turned out to be a solid move. First (or second?) trip out that early season, I used it to take the only three keepers we three “experts” put in the boat, including a pair of fat 5lbers. The rod handled them exactly as it should – no drama, though it did feature a quite impressive bend. Once those fish went straight up and down in 70’. Very nice indeed.

I really had no intention of “upgrading” this outfit, I was quite pleased with its performance (and looks). Umm, then I made the mistake of visiting again with John at Trophy Tackle. Yeah, of course you know what happened – heck, I even documented my visit in that earlier thread. He showed me the new “Grappler” series from Shimano – which has like 40 different models to choose from. I looked at the “SJ” slow-jig versions, which though truly awesome, wouldn’t fit my needs, being too light in action.

Tackle Monkey


Then John showed me the “J” Jigging rods, specifically the 6’ ML. Oh God, that was IT! I had to have it. Just a gorgeous rod, for my purposes. A bit more power than my BH UL, with a more substantial tip – it was rated to easily jig up to a 4oz lure – while being ridiculously light in the hand. SOLD! The “Tackle Monkey” had struck again!

I used that rod for the balance of last season to excellent effect, in fact, I could barely put it down to pick up my other rods. Even when “drift jigging,” during which I would ordinarily use one of my baitcasting setups, for the most part, I stuck with the Grappler/Evict combo – with devastating results.

It’s “different,” fluking drifting with a spinning rig. Though it’s a tad inconvenient to have to keep opening the bail for bite drop-backs. Or to stay in touch with the bottom while drifting over varied-depth grounds, it’s still pretty cool to fish this way.

Not to mention having the reel under the rod seems to be MUCH easier on my wrists. No more “fluke fishing carpels tunnel”-type pain after long trips. I have to admit, that’s a big advantage. Switching back and forth between the bait casters and this spinner has me in much better shape at the trip’s conclusion.

I’m keeping the Grappler stick


So, what’s new on the horizon? What new tackle am I looking at? Hah, funny you should ask. Over the past winter I’ve been gifted several cash cards, reel repair services rendered, and the such. So I am considering acquiring further refinement to my spinning efforts. I’m keeping the Grappler stick – as I’m still in love with it. But I think I’d like to put a lighter weight reel on it for the coming season.

There isn’t a thing in the world wrong with my Evict 2000. Two seasons of use and it’s still a super smooth cranker. In fact it actually cranks smoother now than when it was new, right out-of-the-box. It took a good bit of time for those hard stainless steel gears to properly mesh together. But it’s super-nice to crank now, that’s for sure. As far as hauling in fish, it’s certainly proven itself on both the fluke and tog jigging grounds. And I still love it.

However, all that internal stainless steel (main and pinion gears and spool shaft) comes at a price. Weight. This bad boy ain’t light, coming in at around 11oz, loaded with line, ready to fish. Until proven otherwise, I do not believe that such a heavy-duty reel is necessary on the fluke grounds. Nice to know just how bullet-proof this reel is, but the weight is just a bit much. There are alternatives out there, that are worthy of consideration.

Two choices come to mind


Two choices come to mind, both of which are in the uber-lightweight 6.3oz weight range. The brandy-new Shimano Vanford and the excellent Daiwa Ballistic LT. Both feature bodies made of advanced composites, the Vanford of Shimano’s Ci4+, and the Ballistic of Daiwa’s proprietary Zaion. Both are really nice pieces; both have some unique features that make them worth considering.

The Vanford is very new – featuring Shimano’s latest “Micro-Module II” gearing. It has a long-stroke spool for better line storage and casting, and a 6:1 gear ratio.

The Ballistic LT


The Ballistic LT features Daiwa’s super-smooth Digi-gearing, their mag-seal technology to keep the pinion bearing from rotting out from SW adulteration, and a much-preferred (to me at least) 5.3:1 gear ratio – the better to pull harder on deep fluke.

I have had some initial concerns about frame/stem flexing under load, which no aluminum-framed reel will ever exhibit. But more than a dozen seasons of owning my little Stradic Ci4, plus conversations with the owners of other much more current composite reels have allayed those concerns.

My Evict will not be going into hibernation – as its still gonna sail with me, mounted to the Grappler, once tog jigging season comes around once again. THAT’S where all that internal high-strength stainless steel really will make the difference. In my opinion, anyway.

So that’s where I’m at for the coming season, as it pertains to “Must bring along” fluke outfits. I would like to hear your thoughts on what choices I’ve made, as well as what you consider your “must-brings.”
Interesting, SH27. What spinning rod are you leaning towards?

You can see what I would recommend!
This "deep drop" fluking topic is waaaay beyond my scope and DEFINITELY not what I had in mind when I "really" started to perfect my techniques as a fluke jigger nearly 20 years ago. At that time I was a guy who had a home turf fluke bite that was booming and RARELY did I have to venture into depths more than 40 feet. I built, designed and bought all my rods & reels with shallow water fluke (less than 50 feet) in mind. Being honest, I don't want to fish deep and in sticky shit that eats my tackle...But since the fluke aren't making their numbers known in my neck of the woods like they used to, I've been forced to rethink my gear as well....GRUDGINGLY!! What I've decided is that I'm not re-tooling my fluke arsenal to get better equipped for fishing in water 70' and up.

No way I could ever mirror the enthusiasm Lep has for the tackle mods & gear upgrades nearly every season like he does. I simply don't have the interest for it at this point. Once the fluke decided they weren't gonna travel this far west anymore, I decided to stop being so gung-ho about catching them. To get to water in excess of 80 feet for me is AT LEAST a 10 mile trip from the dock, so you can imagine my "level of desire" to target them has taken a drastic hit the last several seasons. And that is before even taking into account that the gear I had been stockpiling and customizing for nearly two decades was not cutting the mustard once 6-10 ounces of lead became the "new norm." Basically, I checked out.

Most of my "cool" gear is not designed to jig 6-10 ounces. It's much more comfy in the 1-4 ounce realm. I had been "pushing the envelope" with he light gear more and more over the years and found I was appreciating the bigger fish (anything over 7 lbs. in my book) much more with 6 lb. test braid and ultra lite Phenix blanks. Having several fish up to 9.5 lb. on that gear really was satisfying and I was amped up to find ways to do it with lighter lines, rods & jigs.

Call me old school but I have NOT been infected with the spinning gear craze. Not for fluke, not for tog. I think it's more of a situation that I don't feel comfortable with it, than it is anything else. I definitely think it's cool and much easier to get lighter jigs to bottom faster with spinning gear though.

So, for me, I'm gonna be sticking with the gear I have and I'm not looking back. If the fluke world has passed me by, so be it. If deeper water fluke fishing is going to be "necessary" I'm going to find it necessary to fish for fluke less frequently. I'll get a few deep water trips in with Lep and his crew and I'll be happy with that.

If my home town fluke fishing ever comes back to it's heyday, I'll consider myself a fluke fisherman again. As for right now, I maintain my semi-retired status.

I can hear Naples, Florida calling my name.......................
Well, bottom line: "Gotta fish where the fish are, not where you want them to be." Here on the mid-South Shore, if you want consistent, quality fishing for plus-sized fish, other than very brief periods in the Bays or shallow inshore waters, that location will be in the deeper water.

I do think that Savvy is exaggerating a bit, there's still plenty of good fishing to the far West and off northern NJ. Just have to find that better fishing, and concentrate the efforts there. The "old" drops are no longer actively producing in that area. Yep, here off JI as well. There's TONS of deeper rubble grounds to the far West. To stay in the game in that area its time to go prospecting - find the fish out there, see which of those drops hold fish, and when. That's what we here, a bit to the East had to do. And now that prospecting is solidly paying off.

No one, least of all me, really cares to run 8 - 10 miles off the beach in order to catch. But realizing some years ago that this was the "new game," we had to adapt and refine our tackle and techniques to put those deep-dwelling better fish in the box. Now that I think about it, this fishery was actually the genesis of this board. Its why I got interested in all this writing stuff, years and years ago. I really believed I could help others do better in what at the time was a new-ish fishery. Well, new for a lot of guys, anyway.

Look, in my opinion, this is the "Last Stand Corral," for our mid-South Shore fluke fishery. The Bays and formerly-great inshore fishing has all but disappeared. Fifty years of fluking tells me this. This is reality. Very limited decent fishing over the sand ridges and depressions, right outside my inlet. And my Bay fishing sux, for the most part. Tons of shorts, with very few keepers - other than super-early in the season, perhaps. So, we fish where we need to, in order to keep putting fish in the box - and that, unfortunately, is deep.

I also question this notion that 8 and 10oz sinkers are commonly employed fishing deep - causing a loss of interest in pursuing this fishery. This sort of thing happens only on the crummiest of days - when we probably shouldn't have sailed to start with. But sail we did, and so we suck it up and do what we have to, in order to keep catching.

Most trips out there, the vast majority of our days in fact, the normal bucktail load is in the 2-4oz range. What's wrong with that? Nothing, in my book. Use the proper tackle and light braid and this certainly is a regular thing - in up to the 85' max we fish.

However, there are "those" days, that do require more horsepower, tackle-wise. So we bring the "big gun" tackle in order to "deal," should conditions turn against us. Just another arrow in the quiver, no more than that. And really, what is this "big gun" tackle anyway?

Maybe a feather-light weight Black Hole stick, or perhaps one of the myriad of Jigging World rods ( there are now so many JW rod series that I can no longer keep track), carrying a tiny beefed-up bait casting reel? What's such an outfit weight? Maybe 12 ounces? Wow, not such a big deal, not in my opinion.

In point of fact, our "heavy" setups are WAAAAY lighter than anything we used back in the 60's thru the mid-90's. Most folks fished the Bays and the inshore ocean drops with much more stout gear - its how it was done in "them" days. Just look at the pic of Mr. Nappi and his record fluke to confirm what I just wrote. Shark tackle for fluke. Now THAT'S a setup I'd hate to heft all day long. Ooofaaah!

Further, why go home, if your boat is up to fishing rougher conditions safely, and you can deal with the rockin' and rollin'? Why the heck not? Hey, come on, who doesn't love fishing the ocean on flat, calm days? No one, right? Its glorious when conditions are perfecto, and the fish are chomping. We all live for those days, right?

But consider this - I find that achieving quality results on bad ocean days gives me the greatest satisfaction of all of our trips. Those are the days I like to talk about in the off-season, over drinks or during a quality "buddy dinner." How we persevered and overcame. But that's just my way, I guess. I've always been a pretty determined kind of guy. Not a quitter. I like to believe my regulars think that way too. I guess that's why they are my regulars, in the first place.

I have no intention of fishing less because the fishing grounds and the methods to properly fish them have changed. I prefer to segue to a newer fishery, refine my boat handling and electronics skills - and fishing gear (duh, of course!) - to best capitalize on what we have, rather than not fish at all. To me, that's crazy-talk! In point of fact, rather than discourage me, this offshore fluke thing has re-energized my overall outlook.

I prefer fishing evolution to fishing extinction. And so I have embraced this deep fishery - and that's probably why we do well "out there." Its no more than a new challenge. Well, challenge accepted - I can hardly wait to get going once again this coming season!

And I'm making boat, tackle and technique plans and refinements even as I type this - to further our collective efforts on the Lep. Because I ain't ready to throw in the towel just yet. Not when we can consistently bring in limits of quality fish, nearly every trip.

Adapt and overcome. Now where have I heard that before? Oh right, I had two Korean War-veteran U.S. Marine uncles. They taught me that. . . and taught me well.

Here's our catch on a very rough day, last July. Capt. Mike and George were aboard that trip. In fact this was Georgie's first "deep" trip. The WX-man really screwed us, with a completely blown forecast. So what to do? Well, careful attention to all the required parameters resulted in a full box of fluke and biscuits on a day that most would never have stayed on the offshore grounds. Now that I think about it, pretty much no one else did! Well anyway, nearly 70 quarts of fish were more than enough for our efforts at the cleaning table, that's for sure. As the lawyers like to say: QED.

View attachment 29786
Not sure if this is a debate, a discussion or just a few guys that are expressing their opinions on the state of our local fluke fishery and how they personally intend to move forward in their pursuit of a certain species given the fact that there has been a significant "shift" in the migration pattern, OR, a reduction in their numbers. Once again, an unknown & unanswered conundrum...Which is the most frustrating aspect. We all have our own ideas about how to "handle" or address this problem. And like most difficult situations, we have differing opinions about the solutions.

I remember the days when I could go up to Port Jeff and fish on Big Joe's (flukinit) Maycraft skiff with Lep and we'd hammer on nice 17-23" fish all day in less than 25 feet of water. It was a terrific fishery up there and I looked forward to it because it suited my preferences for targeting fluke in shallow water with a very high success rate. However, in the last 10 years that fishery has dried up and become almost non-existent. It simply doesn't happen anymore and none of us knows why. So, we no longer go up there to target fluke. Why would we? It would be a waste of time.

A similar thing (not completely) has happened in my neck of the woods. It seems bottom that had been productive for decades, is no longer holding fish. Did Sandy contribute to this problem? I would say yes. Especially to the more shallow (50 feet or less) hard bottom areas that I would assume have been sanded over for the most part making it less desirable for congregating bodies of fluke. Areas that were once very reliable for quality fish (countless over 10 lbs.) are now practically barren. Why? Once again, we don't know. I'm not talking about 1 or 2 areas. I'm saying it's much more wide ranging. Inside Jamaica Bay and outside as well. Are there still quality fluke to be caught? Absolutely. Just not with the same regularity or frequency as we are used to.

Which leads us to the fun part...What do YOU do? It's a very personal decision that each one of us makes and might not always be agreed upon with the masses. I certainly don't think all my friends are going to take the same route I have chosen to take. I've weighed a number of contributing factors that lead me to the decision to target fluke less often. And it's not only fluke. The decline of our bass fishing in Jamaica Bay has me less interested in the coming of spring when we traditionally had awesome bass bites. Those days are also a distant memory. Then we get to my real passion, TOG. 2020 was not a banner year for tautog either. Not even close. A shell of what we are used to. From mid-October straight through till late December, we had one of the worst tautog seasons I can recall. Yes, there was the occasional great day - but in the big picture, the fishery seems to be in a decline. I don't think any of our resident hardcore tog hunters will disagree. That's why so many guys are running hundreds of miles north in search of tog AND fluke.

Getting back to our topic, fluke. The reason why I'm scaling back is simple. I don't find the same joy in catching these fish deeper. With beefier tackle. With more lead. More lost jigs. Stronger currents. More conditions. More travel time. Bigger investment of time. More fuel consumption. Constantly worrying about weather because we are making MUCH longer trips to AB, Cholera, Hempstead Reef, the tankers....Now that I'm getting older I have less desire to make fishing more of a chore than it used to be. I recall the days when I was the 1st guy to the boat at 2am to make a weekend tuna trip to the canyon. Or I was catching blue-dicks all day prior to a sharking trip. Or heading up to Massachusetts to cod fish in 6-10 foot seas. Or heading out to fish in all sorts of terrible weather because tog fishing was insane! Combined with the fact that our local fishery has seen better days - The math is not hard to do. Sadly, I don't think I'm alone in this thought process.

Don't get me wrong, I still greatly enjoy a day of fishing with my buddies, ripping each other and telling war stories while we search for BIG fish. To me, trophy hunting is what still keeps me going. That 10 lb. fluke on my ultra light tackle is an accomplishment that has long-since eluded me - and it haunts me. I came close with a 9.5 lb. fish - but it's not good enough! Catching a 15+ tog on my custom ultra light rods & Leppified Abu's is another achievement I haven't attained. So, there's no doubt I'm still going to pursue those goals - the desire to make that happen is ever-present. Only now I plan to do it less often and when the forecast is extremely favorable.
"Not sure if this is a debate, a discussion or just a few guys that are expressing their opinions on the state of our local fluke fishery and how they personally intend to move forward in their pursuit of a certain species given the fact that there has been a significant "shift" in the migration pattern, OR, a reduction in their numbers."

O.K., so this thread is really about none of the above. That subject is being covered in a different thread, over on the General Board. We've gotten side-tracked here. We all know the current state of this fishery is what it is - but there’s still PLENTY of quality fluke fishing to be had, for those with a desire to hunt it down.

So let’s try to get this thread back on topic - specifically, what outfits are going fishing with you this coming season?
Not sure if this is a debate, a discussion or just a few guys that are expressing their opinions on the state of our local fluke fishery and how they personally intend to move forward in their pursuit of a certain species given the fact that there has been a significant "shift" in the migration pattern, OR, a reduction in their numbers. Once again, an unknown & unanswered conundrum...Which is the most frustrating aspect. We all have our own ideas about how to "handle" or address this problem. And like most difficult situations, we have differing opinions about the solutions.

I remember the days when I could go up to Port Jeff and fish on Big Joe's (flukinit) Maycraft skiff with Lep and we'd hammer on nice 17-23" fish all day in less than 25 feet of water. It was a terrific fishery up there and I looked forward to it because it suited my preferences for targeting fluke in shallow water with a very high success rate. However, in the last 10 years that fishery has dried up and become almost non-existent. It simply doesn't happen anymore and none of us knows why. So, we no longer go up there to target fluke. Why would we? It would be a waste of time.

A similar thing (not completely) has happened in my neck of the woods. It seems bottom that had been productive for decades, is no longer holding fish. Did Sandy contribute to this problem? I would say yes. Especially to the more shallow (50 feet or less) hard bottom areas that I would assume have been sanded over for the most part making it less desirable for congregating bodies of fluke. Areas that were once very reliable for quality fish (countless over 10 lbs.) are now practically barren. Why? Once again, we don't know. I'm not talking about 1 or 2 areas. I'm saying it's much more wide ranging. Inside Jamaica Bay and outside as well. Are there still quality fluke to be caught? Absolutely. Just not with the same regularity or frequency as we are used to.

Which leads us to the fun part...What do YOU do? It's a very personal decision that each one of us makes and might not always be agreed upon with the masses. I certainly don't think all my friends are going to take the same route I have chosen to take. I've weighed a number of contributing factors that lead me to the decision to target fluke less often. And it's not only fluke. The decline of our bass fishing in Jamaica Bay has me less interested in the coming of spring when we traditionally had awesome bass bites. Those days are also a distant memory. Then we get to my real passion, TOG. 2020 was not a banner year for tautog either. Not even close. A shell of what we are used to. From mid-October straight through till late December, we had one of the worst tautog seasons I can recall. Yes, there was the occasional great day - but in the big picture, the fishery seems to be in a decline. I don't think any of our resident hardcore tog hunters will disagree. That's why so many guys are running hundreds of miles north in search of tog AND fluke.

Getting back to our topic, fluke. The reason why I'm scaling back is simple. I don't find the same joy in catching these fish deeper. With beefier tackle. With more lead. More lost jigs. Stronger currents. More conditions. More travel time. Bigger investment of time. More fuel consumption. Constantly worrying about weather because we are making MUCH longer trips to AB, Cholera, Hempstead Reef, the tankers....Now that I'm getting older I have less desire to make fishing more of a chore than it used to be. I recall the days when I was the 1st guy to the boat at 2am to make a weekend tuna trip to the canyon. Or I was catching blue-dicks all day prior to a sharking trip. Or heading up to Massachusetts to cod fish in 6-10 foot seas. Or heading out to fish in all sorts of terrible weather because tog fishing was insane! Combined with the fact that our local fishery has seen better days - The math is not hard to do. Sadly, I don't think I'm alone in this thought process.

Don't get me wrong, I still greatly enjoy a day of fishing with my buddies, ripping each other and telling war stories while we search for BIG fish. To me, trophy hunting is what still keeps me going. That 10 lb. fluke on my ultra light tackle is an accomplishment that has long-since eluded me - and it haunts me. I came close with a 9.5 lb. fish - but it's not good enough! Catching a 15+ tog on my custom ultra light rods & Leppified Abu's is another achievement I haven't attained. So, there's no doubt I'm still going to pursue those goals - the desire to make that happen is ever-present. Only now I plan to do it less often and when the forecast is extremely favorable.
Savvy I know you a long time ..Built you many rods & we have talked fishing for years...anyone that has fished the south shore for more than ten or so years understands your pain..its not only fluke but every fish ..maybe not so much dogfish ...

as far as fishing light gear in deep water I do it all the time..fished a 25 plus mile wreck with a ultra lite phenix & a 3oz jig ..killed the fish..

I had a great fluke season fish a little out of the box ..stayed away from the fleet..Boat traffic does affect the bite ...but I dont jig over 4oz and maybe in the afternoon wind I would have to bump up to 5 or 6oz hi low rig ,over 6 I go bottom fishing or go home..

Gear Phenix or CTS I'm spoiled cant fish factory rods ..Tried all the latest & greatest factory rod ..IMO crap !..only factory built rods worth fishing are the Phenix..Titan, M1 or ultra mbx pretty nice ..M1 & ultra umbx build wrong but if you must go factory they would be my choice..

reels LP under 200 ..I really like the cheap lower gear abu's * my high end reel is the concept 13 low gear... dont take care of my reels & have seen to many high end reels fail so I'm all about cheap fish em a couple of years & toss em..
Shore fishing? I remember as a kid fishing from the shore at the back of West End 2, in the "pocket," right at the base of the Construction Dock rocks. Carried killies all the way from the parking lot in a 5-gal spackle pail. Use to do pretty well, too.

But of course back then I believe there was no quantity limit and you could keep anything 14" or better. Had some really impressive strings of fish to lug back to the car during July/August, if I remember correctly. Those fish used to stack up there, on the outgoing tide.

I wonder what ever happened to my trusty Mitchel 407 (lefty) and 8' Garcia Conolon blue rod? That outfit was really nice, for its day. . . but now would be considered waaaay over-matched for that type of fishing. More like a mid-weight bass outfit, truth be told. That Mitchel 407 was a real caster - if you could keep its bail from snapping closed mid-cast, usually sending your snapped-off rig half-way to Portugal.

I also recall early May fishing from the open beach "in front" at WE II in the surf, catching NICE yellowtail flounders using clams, with that outfit. Those fish, though a little thin on the white side, fried up real nice, in my Mom's electric frying pan - on the back patio. Every real Italian household had a red brick patio back then. And a redwood patio furniture set too. Man, "those was the days," as Archie and Edith used to sing.
any of you guys try that nano fill line ..strong as hell super thin ..I use it on my spinners love it...
I think my biggest issue currently with the deep water fluking is that I haven't really purchased any reels that are "suited" to that style of fishing. It was never a necessity for me. At this point in my "fishing life" there is NO plan to address those needs either. If I do fish the deep drops, it will be with reels I already own.

However, over the years, I have had Capt. Richie build me a few rods that WERE designed with jigging "heavier" jigs in mind. By that I mean, anything over 3 ounces (which is heavy in my book). I don't know every blank number, unfortunately, but there are a few in the arsenal. I find myself bringing them more and more often on my inshore blackfishing trips to do battle with pigs. Every once-in-a while I get hooked up with a 10+ and I enjoy every second of the tussle!

* I have a St. Croix built by Richie that can handle up to a 6 ounce jig. VERY sweet rod that I regretfully do not use often enough. I would bust it out for tog trips but I'm too scared it will break...She's TOO SEXY to have it explode!

* I have a newly purchased (and built by Richie) Charter Special (one of Kilsong's blanks) that was recommended by Lep. I feel it's best suited for jigs between 2 & 4 ounces. Only fished it this past season. So far I'm very pleased with it. So much so, I dragged it along and actually caught a few 4-6 lb. tog on it.

* I have (2) CTS BS 702's that were both built by Richie and designed to jig fluke AND blackfish. One is sprial-wrapped with split grips. The other is a more traditional conventional set-up. I think the ideal jigs for those would be 3-5 ounces. I have (2) Abu Garcia Beast 40's that I like to throw on them when I dual purpose them for tog. Being honest, I haven't used them much for deep water fluke jigging. That's probably because I don't do much deep water fluke jigging.

Then I have my off-the-rack rods, that were also bought with deep water fluke jigging in mind AND to use for shallow water tog trips.

* I have an older version Daiwa Proteus SS64MLB (with the very small guides) which has no problem fishing jigs up to 4 ounces. Love the Proteus rods. I have at least one with me on just about every fishing trip I make.

* I have a newer version Daiwa Proteus 66XHB that easily handles up to 6 ounces and I ALWAYS drag that one with me on tog trips. Matter of fact, I've caught numerous bass up to 20 lbs. on that rod while chunking. It's a TON of fun! Love that rod! It's like my American Express card....I don't leave home without it!

* I have a Daiwa Harrier 64MHB - another sweet rod that I dual purpose for tog. Her sweet spot is 3-5 ounce jigs but I can push the envelope to 6 ounces if I have to. Jigging fluke with 6 ounce jigs IS NOT my idea of fun, so I frown on it at all costs. Like I always say, "I'd rather be sleeping in my bed than jigging 6 ounces of lead!"

That about accounts for my "deep water fluke jigging rods." My "passion" for fluke fishing has drastically waned in the last 5 or so years. Not sure if it's coming back. I guess the fluke fishing will have much to say about that.
Wow Savvy, congratulations, three Debbie-Downer posts on one thread, a possible world record! 8-)

Multiple paragraphs of rod descriptions, all appropriate for deeper fishing. Yet no deeper-fishing desire on your part. I see a big sell-off on the way. . .

Guys, get ready for action!
LG - If you're thinking of picking up a setup that's a bit lighter than your BH CS, and want the latest in factory rod excellence - for use on those "nice days" out in the ocean, whilst jigging with bucktails up to 4oz, (and don't mind spending a bit more than the BH CS series), then I highly recommend looking at the Shimano Grappler Type LJ (Light Jig) 180gram version, GRPLJC63MH.

A truly lovely little rod that pairs nicely with an Abu Revo Gen4 Winch. Or for around $100, the Revo X Winch. Spool up with 20lb Sufix 832 or the new Berkley X-9 and you will have two fluke sticks that will cover 95% of what we do here on LI. Talk about a feather-weight outfit! Compared to even a lighter weight rod like your BH CS, this one would be like a fencing foil in you hand.

If I didn't already own a perfectly fine JW Ghost Hunter 150g, that little Grappler LJ would be the rod I'd "have to have" - can say more than that, in terms of a recommendation. I like the new Grapplers THAT much.

Want to add a spinning rig? I think you've seen my thoughts on THAT particular rod/reel combination. How could you miss 'em? 😎
Wow Savvy, congratulations, three Debbie-Downer posts on one thread, a possible world record! 8-)

Multiple paragraphs of rod descriptions, all appropriate for deeper fishing. Yet no deeper-fishing desire on your part. I see a big sell-off on the way. . .

Guys, get ready for action!
Nah, not being a Debbie Downer...Just an honest assessment of what I have experienced the last 8 or so years. I always try to keep it real in my posts.

Regarding "the sell-off" I'd say you were partially accurate. I do have a desire to sell about 30-40% of my rods & reels and that is mostly because I haven't used a good portion of them. It's a shame that such nice equipment is sitting around unused. Like I said, I've curtailed my fishing excursions the last 2 years pretty significantly. Especially, mid-summer fluke trips when it's 95 degrees out with 100% humidity. On those days I'd rather have my spleen removed than cook in the sun running 25 miles to catch 1 or 2 fluke.

Right now my only issue is finding buyers that understand that quality tackle doesn't come at off-the-rack Tsunami prices. And I'm not going to give away $250 reels for $40. The Abu's you built me are mine for good, whether I fish them or not, I'm keeping all of them. But the other reels in the arsenal are all in absolutely beautiful condition and I won't part with them unless I garner a fair price.

It all remains to be seen.
Put the goods in the appropriate thread up above, price them well, and let’s see if we can move them to some happy new owners
Hi Flukeaholic- glad to here I’ve helped. I still own my original BPS Muskie rod (named by the infamous Capt.XXX as the "Lep Stick"), though in truth, I haven't used it in years.

Anyway, the model number of that Harrier should be in that Tackle Evaluation thread. Let me look and comeback here. Being on a cell phone has its limitations. In my hands, anyway.

Yep, it was there, you must have missed it. Model # HRJ64MS. Check to see if Daiwa still offers it - I heard some chatter about them doing some upgrades to their Harrier lineup. This particular rod is really a little sweetheart, and well worth the $99 ask. Good quality for a fair price.
I don't have much to add here except to say Thank You to both Lep and Capt Mike for taking the time to share such awesome and detailed information 👍🙏
I had the great experience of fishing with Capt Mike and Lep more than once last year and they are always eager to share their knowledge. You would be hard-pressed to find a better team. They are a wealth of knowledge from tog and sea bass to great fluke fishing and more. We're lucky to have them here at nyangler!
G