the "Headline That Caught My Attention or the WTF" thread


A tense standoff between Florida authorities and an armed suspect became even more dangerous over the weekend when a naked 28-year-old woman suddenly drove into the crime scene on a golf cart, according to reports.

The woman, identified as Jessica Smith, from Boston, had "a distinct odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from her person, and she was completely nude," an affidavit of the incident said, according to FOX 13 of Tampa Bay.
 

John Lennon's classic song “Imagine,” and the album of the same name, will be 50 years old. In celebration of the song’s power and resonance on this 50th anniversary, the most poignant and well-known lyric from the track has been projected onto equally iconic buildings and sites around the world.

“Imagine All The People Living Life In Peace” has appeared as a digital projection on the Houses of Parliament and St Paul’s Cathedral in London and on the Liver Building and the Museum of Liverpool in John’s home city.

It has also appeared on the Berlin Wall and on digital billboards in Times Square in New York and near the historic Nihonbashi bridge in Tokyo. These projections echo a similar billboard campaign Yoko undertook 20 years ago when exactly the same wording was used in prominent sites around the world.

Yoko Ono Lennon said today; “John would have loved this. ‘Imagine’ embodied what we believed together at the time. We are still together now and we still believe this. The sentiment is just as important now as when it was written and released 50 years ago.”

(y)
 
I've got an original pressing - lyrics are on the album sleeve.

20210908_203558a .webp
 

Scary...​

Did Nazis Produce These Uranium Cubes? Researchers Look for an Answer.​

Determining whether the cubes were produced by Nazi Germany could lead to more questions, such as whether the Nazis could have had enough to create a critical reaction.

Did Nazis Produce These Uranium Cubes? Researchers Look for an Answer.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's cube, which is enclosed in a protective case.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's cube, which is enclosed in a protective case. Credit... Andrea Starr/PNLL

The failure of Nazi Germany’s nuclear program is well established in the historical record. What is less documented is how a handful of uranium cubes, possibly produced by the Nazis, ended up at laboratories in the United States.

Scientists at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the University of Maryland are working to determine whether three uranium cubes they have in their possession were produced by Germany’s failed nuclear program during World War II.

The answer could lead to more questions, such as whether the Nazis might have had enough uranium to create a critical reaction. And, if the Nazis had been successful in building an atomic bomb, what would that have meant for the war?

Researchers at the laboratory believe they may know the origins of the cubes by the end of October. For the moment, the main evidence is anecdotal, in the form of stories passed down from other scientists, according to Jon Schwantes, the project’s principal investigator.

The lab does not have scientific evidence or documentation that would confirm that Nazi Germany produced the black cubes, which measure about two inches on each side. The Nazis produced 1,000 to 1,200 cubes, about half of which were confiscated by the Allied forces, he said.

“The whereabouts of most all of those cubes is unknown today,” Dr. Schwantes said, adding that “most likely those cubes were folded into our weapons stockpile.”

Dismantling the German experimental nuclear pile at Haigerloch, southwest of Stuttgart, in April 1945.

Dismantling the German experimental nuclear pile at Haigerloch, southwest of Stuttgart, in April 1945.Credit...David Irving/ Brookhaven National laboratory, Emilio Segrè Visual Archives,

“The crux of our effort is to first and foremost confirm the pedigree of these cubes,” he said. “We do believe they are from Nazi Germany’s nuclear program, but to have scientific evidence of that is really what we’re attempting to do.”

When they were first produced, the cubes were essentially pure uranium metal. Over time, that elemental uranium has partly decayed into thorium and protactinium. To determine the age of the cubes, researchers plan to use a process called radiochronometry, which can separate and quantify the cubes’ chemical makeup.

“Uranium decays at a regular rate,” Dr. Schwantes said. “So when we measure the ratio of thorium to uranium in the cube, that is essentially a measure of the amount of time that has passed.”

And fixing a time when the cubes were made would help in tracing whether it could have been in the early 1940s in Germany. Such a determination would also bring more questions: Could the Nazis have built their own bomb, lengthening the war or even changing the outcome?

Ultimately, German forces were defeated by the Allies in May 1945, ending the war in Europe, and in the Pacific, Japan held on until September, surrendering only after the United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing tens of thousands of people.

Uranium cubes on chains in the model of the Haigerloch reactor

Uranium cubes on chains in the model of the Haigerloch reactor Credit...Felix König

Dr. Schwantes, who said he gravitated toward math and chemistry in school, said he preferred not to speculate about how history could have been different, but said it was surreal to “hold this kind of historic material in hand and think about where it’s been, and who else has held it.”

Some historians think that even with nuclear capability, the Nazis would not have been able to change how the war ended.

Kate Brown, who teaches environmental and Cold War history at M.I.T., speculated that Nazi Germany’s production of nuclear weapons probably wouldn’t have had much of an impact on the war.

“They were in total war mode, increasingly so,” she said. “They could have made a dirty bomb. That’s not as difficult as making a nuclear bomb.”

A key ingredient the Germans needed to produce an atomic bomb was heavy water, which is water made of a hydrogen isotope called deuterium that has twice the mass of regular hydrogen.

In their quest to produce an atomic bomb, the Germans wanted to use a method in which uranium is submerged in heavy water, Professor Brown said. But the Allies dealt those plans “a big blow” when they bombed a plant in Norway that was the only place the Germans could get the key ingredient, she added.

Additionally, to succeed in its efforts, Nazi Germany would have needed large factories to produce bombs, vast tracts of land to test them and security from the threat of aerial attacks so that enemies could not spy on them, Professor Brown said.

Adam Seipp, a history professor at Texas A&M University, said Nazi Germany lacked the resources because it was “really bad at industrial production.”

“It’s one of the reasons they lost the war so catastrophically,” he said.

Professor Brown said that even if Nazi Germany had been able to produce a dirty bomb, the Germans would have needed a plane that could fly undetected for a long distance.

“They wouldn’t have had planes that could have reached cities like Moscow,” she said. “Really, the only target I can think of would be London,” she said.

Professor Brown said that while a Nazi bomb would not have had much of an impact on the war, the Nazis set the stage for the Cold War simply by trying to build one. The Soviets, who were then U.S. allies in defeating Germany, were aware that the Americans took this uranium out of the country “right out from under them,” she said.

“That becomes a real engine for suspicion that sets up the Cold War, almost immediately,” Professor Brown said.

After the war, the Soviet Union and the United States were both interested in German scientists and their equipment, Professor Seipp said. The United States even launched a covert effort, Operation Paperclip, with the objective of “moving high-value German scientists to the United States, and often, frankly, ignoring their very problematic wartime pasts, so that they stay out of Soviet hats.”

“That helps to kind of widen the growing gap between these former allies,” he said.

What ensued was an arms race between the United States and the Soviets (the U.S. showed its strength first when it bombed Japan in 1945), which was followed by a space race between the former allies.

For now, Dr. Schwantes said preliminary results on two cubes look promising. The science being used to date the cubes is not new, he said, adding that radiochronometry is the same technique scientists used to establish the age of the earth as 4.5 billion years.

“In our case, it’s the same science applied to different problems,” Mr. Schwantes said. While the scientists who established Earth’s age were working with time scales in the billions of years, he said, “We’re interested in time regimes that are like zero to 100 years.”
 
Last edited:

Scary...​

Did Nazis Produce These Uranium Cubes? Researchers Look for an Answer.​

Determining whether the cubes were produced by Nazi Germany could lead to more questions, such as whether the Nazis could have had enough to create a critical reaction.

Did Nazis Produce These Uranium Cubes? Researchers Look for an Answer.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's cube, which is enclosed in a protective case.'s cube, which is enclosed in a protective case.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's cube, which is enclosed in a protective case. Credit... Andrea Starr/PNLL

The failure of Nazi Germany’s nuclear program is well established in the historical record. What is less documented is how a handful of uranium cubes, possibly produced by the Nazis, ended up at laboratories in the United States.

Scientists at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the University of Maryland are working to determine whether three uranium cubes they have in their possession were produced by Germany’s failed nuclear program during World War II.

The answer could lead to more questions, such as whether the Nazis might have had enough uranium to create a critical reaction. And, if the Nazis had been successful in building an atomic bomb, what would that have meant for the war?

Researchers at the laboratory believe they may know the origins of the cubes by the end of October. For the moment, the main evidence is anecdotal, in the form of stories passed down from other scientists, according to Jon Schwantes, the project’s principal investigator.

The lab does not have scientific evidence or documentation that would confirm that Nazi Germany produced the black cubes, which measure about two inches on each side. The Nazis produced 1,000 to 1,200 cubes, about half of which were confiscated by the Allied forces, he said.

“The whereabouts of most all of those cubes is unknown today,” Dr. Schwantes said, adding that “most likely those cubes were folded into our weapons stockpile.”

Dismantling the German experimental nuclear pile at Haigerloch, southwest of Stuttgart, in April 1945.

Dismantling the German experimental nuclear pile at Haigerloch, southwest of Stuttgart, in April 1945.Credit...David Irving/ Brookhaven National laboratory, Emilio Segrè Visual Archives,

“The crux of our effort is to first and foremost confirm the pedigree of these cubes,” he said. “We do believe they are from Nazi Germany’s nuclear program, but to have scientific evidence of that is really what we’re attempting to do.”

When they were first produced, the cubes were essentially pure uranium metal. Over time, that elemental uranium has partly decayed into thorium and protactinium. To determine the age of the cubes, researchers plan to use a process called radiochronometry, which can separate and quantify the cubes’ chemical makeup.

“Uranium decays at a regular rate,” Dr. Schwantes said. “So when we measure the ratio of thorium to uranium in the cube, that is essentially a measure of the amount of time that has passed.”

And fixing a time when the cubes were made would help in tracing whether it could have been in the early 1940s in Germany. Such a determination would also bring more questions: Could the Nazis have built their own bomb, lengthening the war or even changing the outcome?

Ultimately, German forces were defeated by the Allies in May 1945, ending the war in Europe, and in the Pacific, Japan held on until September, surrendering only after the United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing tens of thousands of people.

Uranium cubes on chains in the model of the Haigerloch reactor

Uranium cubes on chains in the model of the Haigerloch reactor Credit...Felix König

Dr. Schwantes, who said he gravitated toward math and chemistry in school, said he preferred not to speculate about how history could have been different, but said it was surreal to “hold this kind of historic material in hand and think about where it’s been, and who else has held it.”

Some historians think that even with nuclear capability, the Nazis would not have been able to change how the war ended.

Kate Brown, who teaches environmental and Cold War history at M.I.T., speculated that Nazi Germany’s production of nuclear weapons probably wouldn’t have had much of an impact on the war.

“They were in total war mode, increasingly so,” she said. “They could have made a dirty bomb. That’s not as difficult as making a nuclear bomb.”

A key ingredient the Germans needed to produce an atomic bomb was heavy water, which is water made of a hydrogen isotope called deuterium that has twice the mass of regular hydrogen.

In their quest to produce an atomic bomb, the Germans wanted to use a method in which uranium is submerged in heavy water, Professor Brown said. But the Allies dealt those plans “a big blow” when they bombed a plant in Norway that was the only place the Germans could get the key ingredient, she added.

Additionally, to succeed in its efforts, Nazi Germany would have needed large factories to produce bombs, vast tracts of land to test them and security from the threat of aerial attacks so that enemies could not spy on them, Professor Brown said.

Adam Seipp, a history professor at Texas A&M University, said Nazi Germany lacked the resources because it was “really bad at industrial production.”

“It’s one of the reasons they lost the war so catastrophically,” he said.

Professor Brown said that even if Nazi Germany had been able to produce a dirty bomb, the Germans would have needed a plane that could fly undetected for a long distance.

“They wouldn’t have had planes that could have reached cities like Moscow,” she said. “Really, the only target I can think of would be London,” she said.

Professor Brown said that while a Nazi bomb would not have had much of an impact on the war, the Nazis set the stage for the Cold War simply by trying to build one. The Soviets, who were then U.S. allies in defeating Germany, were aware that the Americans took this uranium out of the country “right out from under them,” she said.

“That becomes a real engine for suspicion that sets up the Cold War, almost immediately,” Professor Brown said.

After the war, the Soviet Union and the United States were both interested in German scientists and their equipment, Professor Seipp said. The United States even launched a covert effort, Operation Paperclip, with the objective of “moving high-value German scientists to the United States, and often, frankly, ignoring their very problematic wartime pasts, so that they stay out of Soviet hats.”

“That helps to kind of widen the growing gap between these former allies,” he said.

What ensued was an arms race between the United States and the Soviets (the U.S. showed its strength first when it bombed Japan in 1945), which was followed by a space race between the former allies.

For now, Dr. Schwantes said preliminary results on two cubes look promising. The science being used to date the cubes is not new, he said, adding that radiochronometry is the same technique scientists used to establish the age of the earth as 4.5 billion years.

“In our case, it’s the same science applied to different problems,” Mr. Schwantes said. While the scientists who established Earth’s age were working with time scales in the billions of years, he said, “We’re interested in time regimes that are like zero to 100 years.”

Okay, I'm confused...


The lab does not have scientific evidence or documentation that would confirm that Nazi Germany produced the black cubes, which measure about two inches on each side. The Nazis produced 1,000 to 1,200 cubes, about half of which were confiscated by the Allied forces, he said.

Do they know, or don't they?
 
Okay, I'm confused...


The lab does not have scientific evidence or documentation that would confirm that Nazi Germany produced the black cubes, which measure about two inches on each side. The Nazis produced 1,000 to 1,200 cubes, about half of which were confiscated by the Allied forces, he said.

Do they know, or don't they?
Danged if I know. They can "trace" most uranium back to it's source through analyses so I figure that's what they're doing now.

I should work out if they had a critical mass, mathematically. IIRC, 1 kg of highly enriched U235 is a critical mass. They don't say what % U235 is in the cubes. Each cube is 8 cubic inches which translates to 131 cc. Each cc of U235 weighs 19.1 g, so there was 19.1 kg of U235 in all those cubes, IF it was pure, fissionable U235 they had 19 bombs worth. If it was not enriched, then it was "interesting, but not dangerous" since natural Uranium is 99.27% unfissionable U238 and 0.27% U235. At those purities, the cubes would only have a total of 52 g of U235...
 
freakin' marvelous..............


Approximately 70 percent of people who are infected with the Nipah virus die, says Dr. Stephen Luby, a professor of infectious disease at Stanford University. When the virus first appeared in Malaysia in 1999, it killed more than 100 of the approximately 300 people that had been infected. When it emerged in Kerala in 2018, only two of the nineteen people who’d contracted Nipah survived.

Often even survivors are left to suffer. Many are left with long-term consequences, including “persistent convulsions and personality changes,” according to the CDC.

For those reasons and others, the World Health Organization declared Nipah a “virus of concern” and experts are urging more research and attention.
 
@MOJOE where's our reporter on the scene report???

What happens next for the whale carcass found off Staten Island? Scientist details next steps

A chief scientist from the Atlantic Marine Conservation Society details the next steps for the humpback whale carcass at Great Kills Park.

1631959922814.webp


STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — Following the discovery of a 40- to 50-foot dead humpback whale floating near the shores of Great Kills Park Friday morning, a Long Island-based marine non-profit, along with state agencies, will look to fill in the blanks on what caused the whale to come to shore.


Rob DiGiovanni, the founder and chief scientist at the Atlantic Marine Conservation Society, said right now they’re focused on finding a way to get the whale out of the water so they can examine it.


Whale at Great Kills Park

A whale carcass is seen in the waters off of Great Kills Park on Friday, Sept. 17, 2021. (Staten island Advance/Maura Grunlund)

DiGiovanni added that humpbacks are susceptible to vessel strikes. The North Atlantic Right and Minke whale are the two other types of species that frequent the nearby waters.

“Recently, we have seen a higher frequency in humpback sightings and mortalities in the New York area,” he said. “It could be a number of factors, but we are investigating it further.”

According to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) data, since 2016, 31 humpback whales have been stranded in New York. About half of deaths came from human-induced mortality events.

it is a part of what researchers are calling an “unusual mortality event,” where, beginning five years ago, elevated whale mortalities have been recorded along the Atlantic coast from Maine through Florida.
 
@MOJOE where's our reporter on the scene report???

What happens next for the whale carcass found off Staten Island? Scientist details next steps

A chief scientist from the Atlantic Marine Conservation Society details the next steps for the humpback whale carcass at Great Kills Park.

View attachment 38396

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — Following the discovery of a 40- to 50-foot dead humpback whale floating near the shores of Great Kills Park Friday morning, a Long Island-based marine non-profit, along with state agencies, will look to fill in the blanks on what caused the whale to come to shore.


Rob DiGiovanni, the founder and chief scientist at the Atlantic Marine Conservation Society, said right now they’re focused on finding a way to get the whale out of the water so they can examine it.


Whale at Great Kills Park

A whale carcass is seen in the waters off of Great Kills Park on Friday, Sept. 17, 2021. (Staten island Advance/Maura Grunlund)

DiGiovanni added that humpbacks are susceptible to vessel strikes. The North Atlantic Right and Minke whale are the two other types of species that frequent the nearby wahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V84UWcwTXpkters.

“Recently, we have seen a higher frequency in humpback sightings and mortalities in the New York area,” he said. “It could be a number of factors, but we are investigating it further.”

According to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) data, since 2016, 31 humpback whales have been stranded in New York. About half of deaths came from human-induced mortality events.

it is a part of what researchers are calling an “unusual mortality event,” where, beginning five years ago, elevated whale mortalities have been recorded along the Atlantic coast from Maine through Florida.
morning roccus,, didnt hear to much on that,,i was inland at that time?,,,,, i hear anything ill report :),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,><)))):>
><))):>
 

As the inhabitants of an ancient Middle Eastern city now called Tall el-Hammam went about their daily business one day about 3,600 years ago, they had no idea an unseen icy space rock was speeding toward them at about 38,000 mph (61,000 kph).

Flashing through the atmosphere, the rock exploded in a massive fireball about 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) above the ground. The blast was around 1,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. The shocked city dwellers who stared at it were blinded instantly. Air temperatures rapidly rose above 3,600 degrees Fahrenheit (2,000 degrees Celsius). Clothing and wood immediately burst into flames. Swords, spears, mudbricks and pottery began to melt. Almost immediately, the entire city was on fire.

Some seconds later, a massive shockwave smashed into the city. Moving at about 740 mph (1,200 kph), it was more powerful than the worst tornado ever recorded. The deadly winds ripped through the city, demolishing every building. They sheared off the top 40 feet (12 m) of the 4-story palace and blew the jumbled debris into the next valley. None of the 8,000 people or any animals within the city survived – their bodies were torn apart and their bones blasted into small fragments.

About a minute later, 14 miles (22 km) to the west of Tall el-Hammam, winds from the blast hit the biblical city of Jericho. Jericho’s walls came tumbling down and the city burned to the ground.


It all sounds like the climax of an edge-of-your-seat Hollywood disaster movie. How do we know that all of this actually happened near the Dead Sea in Jordan millennia ago?
===========

well - you'll just have to go to the link....
 

As the inhabitants of an ancient Middle Eastern city now called Tall el-Hammam went about their daily business one day about 3,600 years ago, they had no idea an unseen icy space rock was speeding toward them at about 38,000 mph (61,000 kph).

Flashing through the atmosphere, the rock exploded in a massive fireball about 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) above the ground. The blast was around 1,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. The shocked city dwellers who stared at it were blinded instantly. Air temperatures rapidly rose above 3,600 degrees Fahrenheit (2,000 degrees Celsius). Clothing and wood immediately burst into flames. Swords, spears, mudbricks and pottery began to melt. Almost immediately, the entire city was on fire.

Some seconds later, a massive shockwave smashed into the city. Moving at about 740 mph (1,200 kph), it was more powerful than the worst tornado ever recorded. The deadly winds ripped through the city, demolishing every building. They sheared off the top 40 feet (12 m) of the 4-story palace and blew the jumbled debris into the next valley. None of the 8,000 people or any animals within the city survived – their bodies were torn apart and their bones blasted into small fragments.

About a minute later, 14 miles (22 km) to the west of Tall el-Hammam, winds from the blast hit the biblical city of Jericho. Jericho’s walls came tumbling down and the city burned to the ground.


It all sounds like the climax of an edge-of-your-seat Hollywood disaster movie. How do we know that all of this actually happened near the Dead Sea in Jordan millennia ago?
===========

well - you'll just have to go to the link....
So was that Sodom or Gomorrah back in the day?
 
It's easy to forget that not ALL penguins live in the Antarctic, although all are Southern Hemisphere residents, including the ones on the Galapagos Islands...

Endangered African Penguins, With Multiple Bee Stings, Are Found Dead​

Dead bees were found near where the birds died at a park in South Africa, said officials, who suggested the bees may have become aggressive after their nest was disturbed.

Endangered African Penguins, With Multiple Bee Stings, Are Found Dead

African penguins in Simon’s Town, South Africa, in 2015.

African penguins in Simon’s Town, South Africa, in 2015.Credit...Nic Bothma/European Pressphoto Agency

More than 60 endangered African penguins were recently found dead, all with multiple bee stings and no other external injuries, according to officials in a coastal city in South Africa where the birds regularly migrate.

Sixty-three dead African penguins were found Friday at the Boulders Penguin Colony, in Simon’s Town, about 25 miles south of Cape Town, in the southwest of the country.

All the penguins had multiple bee stings, and “many dead bees were found at the site where the birds had died,” according to a statement from the South African National Parks. “Therefore preliminary investigations suggest that the penguins died because of being stung by a swarm of Cape honey bees.”

No external physical injuries were observed on any of the dead penguins, the statement said.

The penguins migrate to the area annually. The bees found near the dead birds are native to the area, “usually coexist with wildlife” and “don’t sting unless provoked,” according to Dr. Alison Kock, a marine biologist at the South African National Parks.

“We have never had a problem like this before,” she said.

The penguins had been stung around the eyes and on their flippers, areas not covered by feathers, Dr. Kock said.

“The feathers over the penguin’s body are densely packed and it’s unlikely the bees stings could have penetrated through these feathers,” Dr. Kock said in an email. “On the other hand, the skin around the eyes and flippers have no feathers and the stings could penetrate in those regions.”

Tests are underway to determine if a toxin or a disease was a factor in the penguins’ deaths, park officials said. So far, officials believe the bees’ nest was disturbed, causing “a mass of bees to flee the nest, swarm and they became defensive and aggressive,” Dr. Kock said. “Unfortunately the bees encountered a group of penguins on their flight path.”

African penguins are an endangered species with a population of only about 41,700 adults, as of 2020, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species.

The birds live mainly in coastal areas of Namibia and South Africa, according to the African Wildlife Foundation, and can reach up to 28 inches in height and 11 pounds in weight. They come ashore to breed, shed old feathers and rest.

Two oil spills, in 1994 and 2000, killed around 30,000 penguins, according to the foundation.

The birds’ population has been decreasing because overfishing has reduced their source of food, according to Oceana, a conservation group.

But the penguins are gaining wider recognition.

The African penguins’ summer migration to Simon’s Town was recently featured in a Netflix documentary, “Penguin Town,” narrated by the actor Patton Oswalt.

“Some penguins may be emperors,” Mr. Oswalt says. “In this place, they are gods.”
 
I'm sure the Apple Fanboy Sheeple will be lined up to get this one. Isn't a practical bone in their bodies...

Apple iPhone 13 Review: The Most Incremental Upgrade Ever​

The new iPhone is 10 percent faster than the last one, and the photos are slightly better. In a word: Huh.

The truth is that smartphones peaked a few years ago.

After so many advances, the miniature computers have reached incredible speeds, their screens have become bigger and brighter, and their cameras produce images that make amateur photographers look like wizards.

The problem with so much great innovation is that upgrades are now so iterative that it has become difficult to know what to write about them each year. That’s especially the case with Apple’s iPhone 13, which may be the most incremental update ever to the iPhone.

The newest iPhone is just 10 percent faster than last year’s models. (For context, in 2015, the iPhone 6S was more than 70 percent faster than its predecessor, the iPhone 6.) Its flashiest new feature, a higher screen “refresh rate” on the $1,000-plus models, makes motion look smoother when opening apps and scrolling through text — hardly a game changer.

Innovations on smartphone cameras also appear to be slowing. Apple executives described the iPhone 13 cameras as “dramatically more powerful” and the iPhone’s “most advanced” ever, largely because they can capture more light and reduce noise. But in my tests, the improvements were marginal.

This is all to say the annual phone upgrade, which companies like Apple and Samsung tout with enormous marketing events and ad campaigns to gin up sales for the holiday shopping season, has become a mirage of tech innovation. In reality, the upgrades are now a celebration of capitalism in the form of ruthless incrementalism.

What better way to illustrate that slow march than with smartphone photos? To put the iPhone 13 cameras to the test, I bought a special tripod to hold two phones side by side so I could snap roughly the same photos of my dogs at the same time. I compared shots taken with the new iPhones, last year’s iPhone 12 and a three-year-old iPhone XS.

When I got the results, I was genuinely surprised by how well the iPhone XS camera stood up against the newest models. And the iPhone 13’s camera was just barely better than the iPhone 12’s.

If you want to read the rest, here you go: Apple iPhone 13 Review: The Most Incremental Upgrade Ever
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top