Whats going on in the World

inhuman bastards.....................
:mad:

...Apalling!
...Inhumane!
...Cruel!

It will only get worse and the world just sits idly by for fear of pissing off a madman while China gives Putin everything he needs. Once Ukraine is taken, the clock will be ticking for the rest of Europe.

And the world does nothing...........

You think Ukraine could have used some of the 50+ billion in High end military equipment the US gifted the Taliban in Afghanistan?
 
Maybe they could have used the aid we held back

As Russia bombards Ukraine, Donald Trump is wading into the conflict barely two years after he faced an impeachment trial on charges that he abused his power by essentially extorting the Kyiv government and Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
 
Maybe they could have used the aid we held back

As Russia bombards Ukraine, Donald Trump is wading into the conflict barely two years after he faced an impeachment trial on charges that he abused his power by essentially extorting the Kyiv government and Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Are Hunter and Joe Biden any better?
 

Blame within Russia’s spy and defence agencies: Bickering spooks at war over disastrous Ukraine invasion and arrest of senior intelligence officer, US officials claim​

  • A blame game has started between the FSB and the Russian Ministry of Defense
  • They are the two departments responsible for the Ukraine invasion preparations
  • Comes after Vladimir Putin reportedly arrested head of the FSB's foreign service
 

Putin 'deports Ukrainians to camps': Russia is accused of genocide by putting refugees in 'filtration' centres and forcibly taking them to remote Siberian towns after confiscating their phones and documents​

  • Russian President Vladimir Putin has been accused of forcibly deporting Ukrainians from Mariupol into Russia
  • Mariupol's city council has claimed that Ukrainian evacuees have had their phones and documents removed
  • Russia on Sunday demanded Ukrainian troops lay down their arms, offered safe passage to civilians fleeing
  • Mariupol authorities rejected the offer within minutes, saying Russia's offers of an amnesty cannot be trusted
  • Offer came hours after a Russian missile strike hit a school in besieged city which was sheltering 400 people
 

Reuters

Russia may not stop with Ukraine – NATO looks to its weakest link​


ON BOARD THE SUPPLY SHIP ELBE, Latvia (Reuters) - Hours after Russian missiles first struck Ukrainian cities on Feb. 24, German naval commander Terje Schmitt-Eliassen received notice to sail five warships under his command to the former Soviet Republic of Latvia to help protect the most vulnerable part of NATO's eastern flank.

The hasty dispatch was part of Germany's scramble to send "everything that can swim out to sea," as the navy's top boss phrased it, to defend an area military strategists have long deemed the weakest point for the alliance. The vessels' sudden departure demonstrated how NATO, and Germany, were propelled by Russia's invasion into a new reality and face what officials, diplomats, intelligence officials and security sources agree is the most serious threat to the alliance's collective security since the Cold War.

Schmitt-Eliassen, who is based in the German Baltic port of Kiel, spoke to Reuters on the flight deck of the supply ship Elbe. Moored next to it, within sight of the church towers of the Latvian capital Riga, were a Latvian and a Lithuanian ship, and vessels and sailors from nations including Denmark, Belgium and Estonia were due to join the group later.

A total of 12 NATO warships with some 600 sailors on board are due to start a mine-clearing operation in the coming days.

On Feb. 16, when intelligence showed an invasion was imminent, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called the current era a "new normal."

It looks a lot like a return to the past. Founded in 1949 to defend against the Soviet threat, the NATO alliance is facing a return to mechanised warfare, a huge increase in defence spending, and potentially a new Iron Curtain falling across Europe. After struggling to find a new post-Cold War role, countering terrorism following the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States in 2001 and a humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, NATO is back defending against its original nemesis.

ut there's a difference. China, which split with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, has refused to condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which Moscow calls a "special military operation." And the old Cold War blueprints no longer work, as NATO has expanded east since the 1990s, bringing in former Soviet states – including the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in 2004.

In early February, China and Russia issued a powerful joint statement rejecting NATO's expansion in Europe and challenging the Western-led international order.

Direct confrontation between NATO and Russia could touch off a global conflict.

"We have reached a turning point," said retired German general Hans-Lothar Domroese, who led one of the highest NATO commands in the Dutch town of Brunssum until 2016.

"We have China and Russia acting in concert now, boldly challenging the United States for global leadership ... In the past, we have been saying deterrence works. Now we have to ask ourselves: Is deterrence enough?"
=============
more if you care at the link
 
Business Insider

The CEO of one of the world's biggest fertilizer companies says there will be a food crisis because of the war in Ukraine and the question is just 'how large' it will be​


Huileng Tan
Mon, March 21, 2022, 2:10 AM


  • The CEO of Yara International, a major fertilizer producer, told WSJ there will be a food crisis.
  • Bloomberg Green Markets North America Fertilizer Price Index jumped 10% Friday to an all-time high.
  • Sweeping sanctions over the Ukraine war are limiting fertilizer supplies from major producers in Russia.

EU sanctions against Russia over the war in Ukraine are driving up fertilizer prices, leading to what one CEO said is going to be a food crisis.

"We are going to have a food crisis. It's a question of how large," said Svein Tore Holsether, the CEO of major fertilizer producer Yara International, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.


His comments came as the Bloomberg Green Markets North America Fertilizer Price Index jumped almost 10% on Friday to an all-time high.

 
I cannot even tell you what huNter looks like........what he does......he is not an elected official I know.....just some guy Guiliani ranted about...OHHH HE HAS SOME KINDA LAPTOP LOL

Willful ignorance is still ignorance. :rolleyes:

There's a local county executive being prosecuted for the same indirect bribery that you're pretending doesn't exist over there.

Sure, you're trolling, but the pretense is beyond pathetic.

I also suspect Ukraine is suffering from a $#it-ton of buyer's remorse right now.

If they weren't in such bad shape from their bad past decisions, they'd be flying Let's Go Brandon! flags too.
 
The political banter when it was hillarys emails and this hunters BS laptop was all great fun n games......but I'm not going to politicize a tragic war like this...whatever the reason it SUCKS for the Ukraines.

There was a UKRAINE/AMERICAN contingent in the St. Patricks day Pearl River parade yesterday and it was heart breaking. These people were crying....they received tremendous support from the crowd along the route
 
1647899290381.webp
 

Reuters

Russia may not stop with Ukraine – NATO looks to its weakest link​


ON BOARD THE SUPPLY SHIP ELBE, Latvia (Reuters) - Hours after Russian missiles first struck Ukrainian cities on Feb. 24, German naval commander Terje Schmitt-Eliassen received notice to sail five warships under his command to the former Soviet Republic of Latvia to help protect the most vulnerable part of NATO's eastern flank.

The hasty dispatch was part of Germany's scramble to send "everything that can swim out to sea," as the navy's top boss phrased it, to defend an area military strategists have long deemed the weakest point for the alliance. The vessels' sudden departure demonstrated how NATO, and Germany, were propelled by Russia's invasion into a new reality and face what officials, diplomats, intelligence officials and security sources agree is the most serious threat to the alliance's collective security since the Cold War.

Schmitt-Eliassen, who is based in the German Baltic port of Kiel, spoke to Reuters on the flight deck of the supply ship Elbe. Moored next to it, within sight of the church towers of the Latvian capital Riga, were a Latvian and a Lithuanian ship, and vessels and sailors from nations including Denmark, Belgium and Estonia were due to join the group later.

A total of 12 NATO warships with some 600 sailors on board are due to start a mine-clearing operation in the coming days.

On Feb. 16, when intelligence showed an invasion was imminent, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called the current era a "new normal."

It looks a lot like a return to the past. Founded in 1949 to defend against the Soviet threat, the NATO alliance is facing a return to mechanised warfare, a huge increase in defence spending, and potentially a new Iron Curtain falling across Europe. After struggling to find a new post-Cold War role, countering terrorism following the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States in 2001 and a humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, NATO is back defending against its original nemesis.

ut there's a difference. China, which split with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, has refused to condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which Moscow calls a "special military operation." And the old Cold War blueprints no longer work, as NATO has expanded east since the 1990s, bringing in former Soviet states – including the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in 2004.

In early February, China and Russia issued a powerful joint statement rejecting NATO's expansion in Europe and challenging the Western-led international order.

Direct confrontation between NATO and Russia could touch off a global conflict.

"We have reached a turning point," said retired German general Hans-Lothar Domroese, who led one of the highest NATO commands in the Dutch town of Brunssum until 2016.

"We have China and Russia acting in concert now, boldly challenging the United States for global leadership ... In the past, we have been saying deterrence works. Now we have to ask ourselves: Is deterrence enough?"
=============
more if you care at the link
Shocking ?
 

  • Ukrainian forces are capturing Russian military equipment and using it against Russian troops.
  • On Sunday, Ukraine seized intact Russian missiles and fired them back, an official told CNN.
  • President Zelenskyy last week joked that captured gear made Russia a top arms supplier to Ukraine.
Ukrainian forces captured a batch of intact Russian missiles and fired them back at Russian troops, CNN reported on Monday.

Russian troops trying to invade Kyiv from the northwestern city of Hostomel on Sunday were attacked with their own weapons, Yuri Golodov, the deputy commander of one of Ukraine's territorial forces, told CNN.

"Last night we sent the Ukrainian armed forces 24 Uragan missiles that were on their way here to fly over our cities," Golodov told CNN on Monday.

"We captured them intact, gave them to the armed forces of Ukraine at night, and now the Ukrainian army has fired missiles back at them," he added.

Golodov leads a team working to repair and repaint Russian military equipment that has been captured or abandoned, CNN reported.

(y)
 

Russian supplies will last 'no more than three days': Putin's men are running out of food, ammunition and fuel, Ukraine says, as attacks on Mariupol fail and offensives elsewhere are 'largely stalled'​

  • Russian forces have enough supplies to last 'no more than three days', Ukraine's generals have claimed today
  • Putin's men are running low on food, fuel and ammunition due to logistical failings that have stalled attacks
  • Ukrainian troops claim to have re-taken city of Makariv, near Kyiv, while attacks on Mariupol were 'repulsed'
  • But failing attacks could spell more death for Ukrainians, as Joe Biden warns Putin is thinking about using chemical and biological weapons because his 'back is against the wall'
 

In destructive power, the behemoths of the Cold War dwarfed the U.S. atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. Washington’s biggest test blast was 1,000 times as large. Moscow’s was 3,000 times. On both sides, the idea was to deter strikes with threats of vast retaliation — with mutual assured destruction. The psychological bar was so high that nuclear strikes came to be seen as unthinkable.

Today, both Russia and the United States have nuclear arms that are much less destructive — their power just fractions of the Hiroshima bomb’s force, their use perhaps less frightening and more thinkable.

Concern about these smaller arms has soared as Russian President Vladimir Putin, in the Ukraine war, has warned of his nuclear might, has put his atomic forces on alert and has had his military carry out risky attacks on nuclear power plants. The fear is that if Putin feels cornered in the conflict, he might choose to detonate one of his lesser nuclear arms — breaking the taboo set 76 years ago after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Analysts note that Russian troops have long practiced the transition from conventional to nuclear war, especially as a way to gain the upper hand after battlefield losses. And the military, they add, wielding the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, has explored a variety of escalatory options that Putin might choose from.

“The chances are low but rising,” said Ulrich Kühn, a nuclear expert at the University of Hamburg and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The war is not going well for the Russians,” he observed, “and the pressure from the West is increasing.”

Putin might fire a weapon at an uninhabited area instead of at troops, Kühn said. In a 2018 study, he laid out a crisis scenario in which Moscow detonated a bomb over a remote part of the North Sea as a way to signal deadlier strikes to come.

“It feels horrible to talk about these things,” Kühn said in an interview. “But we have to consider that this is becoming a possibility.”

James R. Clapper Jr., a retired Air Force general who served as President Barack Obama’s director of national intelligence, said Moscow had lowered its bar for atomic use after the Cold War when the Russian army fell into disarray. Today, he added, Russia regards nuclear arms as utilitarian rather than unthinkable.

“They didn’t care,” Clapper said of Russian troops’ risking a radiation release earlier this month when they attacked the Zaporizhzhia nuclear reactor site — the largest not only in Ukraine but in Europe. “They went ahead and fired on it. That’s indicative of the Russian laissez-faire attitude. They don’t make the distinctions that we do on nuclear weapons.”

A global race for the smaller arms is intensifying. Though such weapons are less destructive by Cold War standards, modern estimates show that the equivalent of half a Hiroshima bomb, if detonated in midtown Manhattan, would kill or injure half a million people.

The case against these arms is that they undermine the nuclear taboo and make crisis situations even more dangerous. Their less destructive nature, critics say, can feed the illusion of atomic control when in fact their use can suddenly flare into a full-blown nuclear war. A simulation devised by experts at Princeton University starts with Moscow firing a nuclear warning shot; NATO responds with a small strike, and the ensuing war yields more than 90 million casualties in its first few hours.
=============
more at the link - assuming anything more is needed........
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top