TAKE A FEW MINUTES AND SEND YOUR LETTER NOW
While trying to keep this in laymen's terms, The Council and Board recommended a 20.7% reduction from last year. This is in line with recommendations but represents a significant reduction in harvest for a fishery that was reported to be 2.4 times the biomass target in 2018.
- Reducing BSB harvest by 20.7% when the biomass is 2.4 the target is outrageous, and can only increase the public's distrust of and frustration with the management process.
Comment for the scup and sea bass rules is open until Tuesday, May 3rd. Everyone that has the slightest interest in BSB should write an email based on the above points in their own words, or at the very least send the basic comment listed below, before that date. They should also be encouraging everyone they know to submit a comment along these lines. Add or change a few features to personalize your comment. Use the following link for comment:
Regulations.gov
Congressional representatives should also be contacted and urged to pressure the Secretary of Commerce to ease this action. Political pressure on elected officials is the best avenue available to get this changed. Take the time to write to your state senators, and your congressional representatives to urge them to lean on the Secretary of Commerce.
Sample Letter:
I am writing to encourage NMFS to reconsider setting BSB measures for 2022 at status quo. With the biomass at 2.4 times the target, there is no need for any reduction. Such action will only serve to further degrade my confidence in the management process, especially after the drastic change in the MRIP process that has wildly increased recreational harvest estimates, but the biomass remains well over what we are expected to maintain.
While trying to keep this in laymen's terms, The Council and Board recommended a 20.7% reduction from last year. This is in line with recommendations but represents a significant reduction in harvest for a fishery that was reported to be 2.4 times the biomass target in 2018.
- Reducing BSB harvest by 20.7% when the biomass is 2.4 the target is outrageous, and can only increase the public's distrust of and frustration with the management process.
Comment for the scup and sea bass rules is open until Tuesday, May 3rd. Everyone that has the slightest interest in BSB should write an email based on the above points in their own words, or at the very least send the basic comment listed below, before that date. They should also be encouraging everyone they know to submit a comment along these lines. Add or change a few features to personalize your comment. Use the following link for comment:
Regulations.gov
Congressional representatives should also be contacted and urged to pressure the Secretary of Commerce to ease this action. Political pressure on elected officials is the best avenue available to get this changed. Take the time to write to your state senators, and your congressional representatives to urge them to lean on the Secretary of Commerce.
Sample Letter:
I am writing to encourage NMFS to reconsider setting BSB measures for 2022 at status quo. With the biomass at 2.4 times the target, there is no need for any reduction. Such action will only serve to further degrade my confidence in the management process, especially after the drastic change in the MRIP process that has wildly increased recreational harvest estimates, but the biomass remains well over what we are expected to maintain.