Cutting the cord question

[pequa1]

Nonetheless

 

[Roccus7]

Why is it illegal ?

Because some state side piece of shott politicians were involved in illegal deals to let monopolies control who watches what, where , when and how much it should cost so their favored money slushing companies who have hands over every aspect of your life and theirs can control all media….fuk that and all fools who don’t learn what power you do have.

So you see copyrights as irrelevant? No doubt that the media companies ram it down our throats. I was furious when a Maine law that would have allowed customers to select only the cable channels they wanted a la carte, but that’s life.

However using your anger to rationalize theft is like looting during a riot.

Just saying…

 

[JackPrintMD]

So you see copyrights as irrelevant? No doubt that the media companies ram it down our throats. I was furious when a Maine law that would have allowed customers to select only the cable channels they wanted a la carte, but that’s life.

However using your anger to rationalize theft is like looting during a riot.

Just saying…

Nonetheless

I am not angry, I’m relaying facts and it seams as your comment mentions your “Furious”.

I am happy, so happy that i found and use all the loopholes that these government scourges and officials use on Gand scales. We would be in Prison if we did what they do but god forbid we spend 600 bucks or pick up streams they approved for the few.

NONE THE LESS……. translates to “ Serve The Less” that’s YOU…….
they get everything, you get LESS

 

[Roccus7]

I am happy, so happy that i found and use all the loopholes

You fail to acknowledge that the loopholes you so proudly tout, are patently illegal.

I guess this is your proclamation of Civil Disobedience, but I doubt a Thoreau Defense would work, as he did time for his fight with "'da man." Just make sure you've got a good VPN installed...

 

[pequa1]

Too many years taking oaths, wearing the green and carrying Bs & Cs. TTFN

 

[jpd]

Why is it illegal ?

Think Napster. Kids were dragged out of their dorm rooms not thinking they did anything wrong...RIAA went after them hard. Someone had to be made an example of..

The Napster case closed its final chapter in August 2007, when Bertelsmann agreed to pay the National Music Publishers Association $130 million to settle the remaining copyright claims.

The case also served as the impetus, in part, for the RIAA's litigation campaign against individual users, as the industry could not keep up a legal game of Whac-A-Mole against flourishing file sharing services like Kazaa and Limewire. In the last six years, the RIAA has filed about 30,000 copyright cases against individuals, most of whom have settled out of court.