Whats going on in the World

I'll give the NYT credit for telling the truth, even though I'm pretty sure it's illegal to buy votes.
They're not allowing comments on the article, which makes sense.

1712582520238.png
 

Former Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett holds similar beliefs, telling Bartiromo last Friday that, while the report might indicate a positive job increase, American job loss tells a different story.

"To people who are U.S. residents, a year ago, about 650,000 of them have lost their jobs this year, so what's going on is that there is an employment boom that's coming from these people who are streaming across the border," he said.
 
Good pic from before.
IMG_0219.jpeg
 
The New York Times

On Abortion, Trump Chose Politics Over Principles. Will It Matter?


When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, the leaders of the anti-abortion movement extracted a series of promises from him in exchange for backing his nomination.

They demanded Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade. They insisted that he defund Planned Parenthood. They pushed for a vice president who was a champion of their cause. And each time, he said yes.

But that was then.

With Roe v. Wade left on the “ash heap of history,” as anti-abortion leaders are fond of saying, they find themselves no longer calling the shots. Their movement remains mighty in Republican-controlled statehouses and with conservative courts, but it is weaker nationally than it has been in years. Many Republican strategists and candidates see their cause, even the decades-old term “pro-life,” as politically toxic. And on Monday, their biggest champion, the man whom they call the “most pro-life president in history,” chose politics over their principles — and launched a series of vitriolic attacks on some of their top leaders.

With his clearest statement yet on the future of abortion rights since the fall of Roe in 2022, Trump laid bare how faulty a messenger he had always been for the anti-abortion cause. When he first flirted with a presidential run in 1999, Trump was clear about his position on abortion: “I’m very pro-choice,” he said. He reversed that stance a dozen years later: “Just very briefly, I’m pro-life,” he told attendees at the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2011.

His support shifted again after the Supreme Court’s decision. While he bragged about appointing three of the justices who overturned Roe, he blamed the movement for Republican losses in the midterm elections. He mused aloud about the idea of a federal ban, but refused to give it the kind of ringing endorsement anti-abortion leaders wanted.

In his four-minute video statement Monday, Trump said that states and their voters should decide abortion policies for themselves, in language that sounded like a free-for-all to the staunchest opponents of abortion. He backed access to fertility treatments such as IVF, and supported exceptions to abortion bans in cases of rape, incest and the life of the mother.

His remarks were low on specifics.




more at the link above....
 

Looks like an insurrection is happening! Where is the media coverage? Should be live!!

Are they in solidary confinement? No access to the legal system?

Maybe just desk appearances.

Two tiered justice system.....................
 
Last edited:

This is what happens when you have a weak administration.

Listening to Masih Alinejad, an Iranian - American journalist, regarding this incident.

Her comment was interesting - You scream "death to Iran" in Iran and act like that, you are KILLED immediately.
 
dark ages here we come.......


(Reuters) -Arizona's top court revived a law dating to 1864 on Tuesday that bans abortion in virtually all instances, another setback for reproductive rights in a state where the procedure already was barred starting at 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, in a statement called the ruling "unconscionable and an affront to freedom," and stressed that she would not prosecute any doctor or woman under the "draconian law."

"Today's decision to reimpose a law from a time when Arizona wasn't a state, the Civil War was raging, and women couldn't even vote will go down in history as a stain on our state," she said.
 
dark ages here we come.......


(Reuters) -Arizona's top court revived a law dating to 1864 on Tuesday that bans abortion in virtually all instances, another setback for reproductive rights in a state where the procedure already was barred starting at 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, in a statement called the ruling "unconscionable and an affront to freedom," and stressed that she would not prosecute any doctor or woman under the "draconian law."

"Today's decision to reimpose a law from a time when Arizona wasn't a state, the Civil War was raging, and women couldn't even vote will go down in history as a stain on our state," she said.
IMG_0225.jpeg
 
dark ages here we come.......


(Reuters) -Arizona's top court revived a law dating to 1864 on Tuesday that bans abortion in virtually all instances, another setback for reproductive rights in a state where the procedure already was barred starting at 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, in a statement called the ruling "unconscionable and an affront to freedom," and stressed that she would not prosecute any doctor or woman under the "draconian law."

"Today's decision to reimpose a law from a time when Arizona wasn't a state, the Civil War was raging, and women couldn't even vote will go down in history as a stain on our state," she said.
"dark ages?" A law dating 1864 being dark ages?

I guess you do not like an even older document, you know, the Constitution.
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top