Whats going on in the World

I don’t blame the guy this hearing was for show, and they were hoping to catch him mis-speaking something so that they could try to hang him on that.

This has been going on for years. They have nothing on him. If they did, they would have indicted him years ago.
 
I don’t blame the guy this hearing was for show, and they were hoping to catch him mis-speaking something so that they could try to hang him on that.

This has been going on for years. They have nothing on him. If they did, they would have indicted him years ago.
He was given a blanket pardon and pleads the fifth with a half dozen lawyers telling home to shut up. The book already hung him, pay attention. This is his indictment happening. Gain of Function Research lol. “I Am The Science” ROTF!
 
ROTFFLMFAO!! Ain't Karma a bi-atch???????
Yes it is noodle (Supreme Court Precedent: In cases like the 1896 decision The Hill, the Supreme Court ruled that a witness who has received a pardon or full immunity stands free of legal risk regarding that offense and must answer questions.). Sucks to be a Village attendee isn’t it now.
 
“The Science” plead the fifth lmao!

I don’t blame the guy this hearing was for show, and they were hoping to catch him mis-speaking something so that they could try to hang him on that.

This has been going on for years. They have nothing on him. If they did, they would have indicted him years ago.

So, here's what's interesting:

Both sides say "Release the files!" They're just talking about different files.

Both sides lose it when the guy they don't like takes the fifth. But they both think their guy is smart for taking the fifth.

And both sides say if there was anything there it would have been acted on by the opposition years ago.

Does anyone see something going on here?

Or maybe nobody sees what's going on here.
 
So, here's what's interesting:

Both sides say "Release the files!" They're just talking about different files.

Both sides lose it when the guy they don't like takes the fifth. But they both think their guy is smart for taking the fifth.

And both sides say if there was anything there it would have been acted on by the opposition years ago.

Does anyone see something going on here?

Or maybe nobody sees what's going on here.
If you read his book you’d see he lied nonstop. He was bragging about interviews and the spotlight. He caused old farts to die alone as their families weren’t allowed to be with. He caused peeps to be arrested for being in public with no mask. Peeps to get shot with rubber bullets for being outside. Told everyone the jab would stop COVID and then said boo about millions crossing border un vaccinated. Kids to be me even more dumb by suggesting six foot is a safe distance. This was all on his guidance for a virus he helped create. Which is why they also changed the meaning of Gain of Function, like they did with the meaning of vaccination.
I seen no one say he’s smart for pleading the fifth.



He’s a scumbag and should be deported to China.
 
If you read his book you’d see he lied nonstop. He was bragging about interviews and the spotlight. He caused old farts to die alone as their families weren’t allowed to be with. He caused peeps to be arrested for being in public with no mask. Peeps to get shot with rubber bullets for being outside. Told everyone the jab would stop COVID and then said boo about millions crossing border un vaccinated. Kids to be me even more dumb by suggesting six foot is a safe distance. This was all on his guidance for a virus he helped create. Which is why they also changed the meaning of Gain of Function, like they did with the meaning of vaccination.
I seen no one say he’s smart for pleading the fifth.


View attachment 118277
He’s a scumbag and should be deported to China.

I'm not defending him at all. Just making an observation.
 
“I seen no one say he’s smart for pleading the fifth.”

You must have missed it. I said he was smart for taking the 5th

Everybody would be smart to take the fifth. All the time.

It's just interesting that when DJT does it I seem to remember you, and/or his other detractors here claiming it indicated guilt.

God bless the founders, and the Constitution is for everyone.
 
Everybody would be smart to take the fifth. All the time.

It's just interesting that when DJT does it I seem to remember you, and/or his other detractors here claiming it indicated guilt.

God bless the founders, and the Constitution is for everyone.
“It's just interesting that when DJT does it I seem to remember you, and/or his other detractors here claiming it indicated guilt.”

Yes, I’m guilty of that. But I was basically just repeating what DJT had said about people taking the 5th., that only guilty people with something to hide take the 5th. After saying that many times he resorted to taking the 5th too.
 
Yes, I’m guilty of that. But I was basically just repeating what DJT had said about people taking the 5th., that only guilty people with something to hide take the 5th. After saying that many times he resorted to taking the 5th too.

You're right he said that. He says a lot of things. And most people who get their legal advice from Perry Mason and other TV shows say the same thing.

Most people are also ignorant enough to believe that "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."

We all had a lot of fun teaching libertarian knock-knock jokes to my left-wing cousins and their daughter (who is minutes away from her bar exam)

Here's how that goes:

Knock, knock.

Get a warrant!
 
“It's just interesting that when DJT does it I seem to remember you, and/or his other detractors here claiming it indicated guilt.”

Yes, I’m guilty of that. But I was basically just repeating what DJT had said about people taking the 5th., that only guilty people with something to hide take the 5th. After saying that many times he resorted to taking the 5th too.
He did it to bust the monkeys balls. Pretty sure she did it. I mean she listed her dad as her husband to commit bank fraud. Not a good example.
 

Members online

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top