Matts
Angler
So that was an interesting speech, but I'm not sure I watched the same speech?
The points I took from that speech were:
1. Climate change is real, terrible, and we need to do something about it.
2. England has much less effect on climate change than high CO2 emitting countries like China and India, so by the same criteria, I would assume the US.
3. We must address an at least equally tragic crisis of world poverty if we want to get the whole world on board to stopping climate change, so a call against nationalism and in favor of glabalism?
4. Science and technology, given the resources and opportunity, can get us out of the climate change crisis, which is another way of saying ban gas guzzlers and gas stoves and keep working on alternate green sources.
5. The truth and reality matter more than feelings when addressing a world crisis, so being against global warming because it upsets the libs can't be the answer?
The points I took from that speech were:
1. Climate change is real, terrible, and we need to do something about it.
2. England has much less effect on climate change than high CO2 emitting countries like China and India, so by the same criteria, I would assume the US.
3. We must address an at least equally tragic crisis of world poverty if we want to get the whole world on board to stopping climate change, so a call against nationalism and in favor of glabalism?
4. Science and technology, given the resources and opportunity, can get us out of the climate change crisis, which is another way of saying ban gas guzzlers and gas stoves and keep working on alternate green sources.
5. The truth and reality matter more than feelings when addressing a world crisis, so being against global warming because it upsets the libs can't be the answer?