Impending Striped Bass Management Changes - Hold onto your butts...

Roccus7

Moderator
Staff member
Charles Witek, a fisheries consultant who actually fishes, has a good handle on the pulse as to what's going on. He published the item below on what changes we could be seeing in Striped Bass management come the 2023 season. Likely Bad News - yes, there will additional restrictions. Good News - the Likely Bad News isn't as bad as some predicted.

Regardless, it's all a "work in progress", but we'll see what happens during the official release of the population survey come October...

Entire post from Charles is here: https://oneanglersvoyage.blogspot.com/2022/08/encouraging-news-for-striped-bass.html

Here's the initial part of the blog post:

ENCOURAGING NEWS FOR STRIPED BASS​


Striped bass are overfished, and a rebuilding plan is long overdue. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s adoption of Amendment 7 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass seems to have lifted the final roadblock to putting a rebuilding plan in place; the new amendment authorizes the ASMFC’s Atlantic Striped Bass Management Board to fast-track such plan’s adoption, without the need for public hearings and similar process, if an upcoming stock assessment update indicates that such action is needed.

The assessment update won’t be completed until October, but preliminary information is currently being developed. Last Wednesday, the ASMFC’s Atlantic Striped Bass Technical Committee held its first meeting to review the data that has been developed so far. While I wasn’t able to listen in, a few folks who did briefed me on what occurred, and the news so far seems good: There will be a fast-tracked rebuilding plan, and rebuilding by 2029 appears to be feasible.

Although both those outcomes were more or less expected, neither had been certain prior to last Wednesday’s meeting. Amendment 7 only authorizes the Management Board to fast-track the rebuilding plan if the stock assessment update indicates that there is at least a 50% chance that the stock won’t rebuild by 2029 under the current management measures, and that a fishing mortality reduction of at least 5% will be needed to achieve rebuilding by that deadline. While just about everyone familiar with the fishery assumed that both of those criteria would be met, data can sometimes surprise us; however, the data reviewed at the recent meeting suggested that, in order to rebuild by 2029, fishing mortality would have to be reduced by approximately 25%.

Thus, the two criteria for fast-tracking rebuilding appear to have been met.

A 25% reduction in fishing mortality is not an insignificant cut. However, it is a reduction that managers should be able to achieve by traditional management means, such as adjusting the current slot limit, perhaps adding a no-harvest season, and reducing commercial quotas. Thus, rebuilding by the 2029 deadline is very doable, and it can be achieved without the imposition of extreme management measures, such as the harvest moratorium that has frequently been discussed within the striped bass fishing community.
 
Charles and I are friends and there are few as sharp as he when it comes to the numbers. I don't always agree with his views, nor he mine, but I'm concerned he's right on the money here. When all is said and done they will shut down the spring season.

If you take the mile-high view on this, you'll find that it's ALL hocus pocus. The continued changes and attempted micromanaging of the fishery will have our heads spinning forever. Sadly the truth is it's nothing but a coin flip as it has a 50% of working.
 
Charles and I are friends and there are few as sharp as he when it comes to the numbers. I don't always agree with his views, nor he mine, but I'm concerned he's right on the money here. When all is said and done they will shut down the spring season.

If you take the mile-high view on this, you'll find that it's ALL hocus pocus. The continued changes and attempted micromanaging of the fishery will have our heads spinning forever. Sadly the truth is it's nothing but a coin flip as it has a 50% of working.
George, I know we are facing some more stringent regulations and in fact I do support some of the measures proposed. However, am I understanding you correctly that some have suggested completely shutting down our spring season? On the North Fork, that has been our only real Striper season for well over 10 years!
 
George, I know we are facing some more stringent regulations and in fact I do support some of the measures proposed. However, am I understanding you correctly that some have suggested completely shutting down our spring season? On the North Fork, that has been our only real Striper season for well over 10 years!
Won't answer for George, but my inclination from reading stuff from all over including Charles and ASMFC is that along with a more stringent slot, there could be a NO RETENTION period for recreational bass to meet a 25% reduction in bass mortality. The Technical Committee has basically given up on a period for total closure on recreational bass fishing including C&R; it's something that's not enforceable. Of course for the no retention period to work, states will have to ensure that they are long enough in periods of active, successful striped bass fishing.

My best guess is that George may be talking about the spring Hudson River fishing, something he really enjoys and has always been very vocal in wanting to protect.

The commercial 25% reduction is easy, just cut the quotas, but some commercial advocates claim that such a cut would decimate and bankrupt that fishery. Expect whining from both Rec & Comms which is a good sign. To me, that means things are stringent enough to have a good chance of working.

We'll see how things shake out. The important thing is that the Board recognizes that bass are overfished and need decisive and strong management actions. I believe that Amendment 7 provides enough insurance that if they do their usual 50/50 chance stuff, if it's not working the can turn around in a year and take more draconian steps. The key part of Amendment 7 is it no longer allows them to kick the can down the road!!
 
Pardon my ignorance, Roccus but how does No Retention differ from a closed fishery, either Rec or Comm.?

With our spring Fluke fishery in the Peconics a mere shadow of what it once was, Weakfish moving back towards their long cycle of decline, Sea Bass closed until late June, and even Blues seeming to start a bit later each year all I will have left to fish for in the spring will be Scup.

If I can't run Striped Bass trips in May, June I might as well just shut down my charter business. Once again, I am all for reasonable conservation methods, but another total moratorium will be too much for many to bear, not just recreationally but economically as well.
 
Pardon my ignorance, Roccus but how does No Retention differ from a closed fishery, either Rec or Comm.?

With our spring Fluke fishery in the Peconics a mere shadow of what it once was, Weakfish moving back towards their long cycle of decline, Sea Bass closed until late June, and even Blues seeming to start a bit later each year all I will have left to fish for in the spring will be Scup.

If I can't run Striped Bass trips in May, June I might as well just shut down my charter business. Once again, I am all for reasonable conservation methods, but another total moratorium will be too much for many to bear, not just recreationally but economically as well.
Don't shoot the messenger here, LOL. This is solely a Recreational Side issue. The mortality reduction for commercial fishing is easily administered by cutting the quotas back by the decided numbers. The sticking point is that as far as the prognosticators' crystal ball can determine with that 9% mortality rate of released fish, Recreational Fisherman kill more striped bass by releasing the millions of fish that they catch than the actual amount that they legally retain. So how do you reduce the mortality rate of Recreational Fishing of striped bass?

I know you're up on the definitions, but let me lay them out for some of the less grizzled old salts around here.

CLOSED - means no fishing activity that targets striped bass, and any striped bass accidently caught must be released. In most Atlantic States, "I'm sorry Mr CO, but I'm fishing for bluefish ( or other reasonable alternatives like Spanish Mackerel, etc)." Bucktailing in the Gut, Sluiceway and Race is totally safe here. Yes, this scenario wrecks havoc with all striped bass associated businesses.

NO RENTION - Means a period of not being able to retain a bass, but targeted striped bass C&R fishing is fine. So you'd be able to run your striped bass trips during a No Retention time window, BUT your fares wouldn't be able to bring any bass home for dinner. This is a tough one for many charter businesses when the business model includes a "fresh fish dinner" expectation. The fly fishing charter boys are far less impacted, as most of them, at least the ones up here, are strictly C&R.

I don't know the answer, and personally, I'm really confused. Up until 2021, I was in a >200 to 1 short to keeper ratio. Last year that number dropped to 25 to 1, and this year I'm at 10 to 1. I'd love to say it's because I've improved my fishing skills, added new techniques, etc., but I know it's because that I'm catching a bunch of 2011 fish, the last exceptional spawn that we've seen. And to help maintain that year class, I've only retained 1 in 4 slot fish caught. No martyrdom here, the fish doesn't freeze well and 2 bass meals a week is more than enough.

What I do know from personal observation is that we've had very poor recent spawns. Those data smack me in the face by the historical data that prior to 2021, more than 1/2 of the fish I've caught were less than 20". In this year, that number is 6%!!!!! It's NOT because I'm fishing bait, I'm using bigger plugs, fishing new spots, etc. It's because there are far less small fish around, and that does trouble me. as it should for EVERYONE.

I'm too old for another moratorium, and up to date, even in the face of compelling data showing bass overfishing, the MO of ASMFC has been to kick the can down the road. Amendment 7 has severely limited their can kicking ability, which is most heartening. Hopefully the next set of restrictions aren't too harsh and will be effective.

Life has shown me that if BOTH sides of an issue are a bit pissed off at the resolution, it's probably an effective plan. I fully anticipate nobody will be happy with whatever roadmap ASMFC lays out for the states to implement, but that should get the fish back on track.

Personally, as long as I'm physically able to drag my sorry, old ass out of bed at 03:30 every day so I can be bass fishing by first light, I'll be a happy man. They can screw around with slot size, retention closures, retention tags, etc. Just don't close the fishery down for time periods, as I can't even try to defend my fishing with "Just targeting bluefish" as nobody has seen a bluefish up here in almost 20 years...
 
George, I know we are facing some more stringent regulations and in fact I do support some of the measures proposed. However, am I understanding you correctly that some have suggested completely shutting down our spring season? On the North Fork, that has been our only real Striper season for well over 10 years!

As @Roccus7 mentioned I am concerned with the western spring fishery. I can't see them saving much by a full state non-retention rule so I don't see it happening there. But if what Witek says is true about their ability to basically do anything at any time, you never know.

I've been at this a long time, and the ability for managers to act with zero input Ii scary
 
I am not a big fan of eating striped bass I don’t mind a catch and release fishery I am very happy going on a trip catching a giant bass and take a video or picture and putting it back. I love catching these fish it’s exciting and Lots of fun.
 
Thanks, Roccus for your typically thorough explanation of the terminology.

It is true, I was referring to the distinction between "No Retention" and "Closed Fishery" from the perspective of being able to keep a legal fish for the table. As you noted, many of our brothers who are fans of the "Fly fishing" challenge of the sport are quite accustomed to releasing nearly everything they catch. However, those who patronize my charter business and most others around the tri state area I know all expect to be able to eat at least some portion of what they catch.
In addition, my wife and I both do love the taste of fresh Striped Bass so it will be a double whammy if they not only curtail my business but also what appears on my dinner plate.

As I said earlier, I too am not a fan of the old "kick the can down the road" approach that has led, in some cases, to the total detriment of a given species. Le's hope the ultimate solution is one that does allow just a little wiggle room for everyone while allowing the stocks to rebuild at the same time.
 

Latest articles

Back
Top