Should They Board, or Shouldn't they?

[longcast]

I admit, the videos were disturbing. I assumed the question "to board or not" was referring to on the water.

Exactly.......................and then all of a sudden it was "about" people getting pulled over in cars for all different reasons. I refrained from chiming in at the time.

 

[Avenger]

Here we go. Another narcissist who thinks the world owes him an explanation if they disagree with him.

Turned a simple thread into yet another political pissing match. Same old, same old.

Narcissism has nothing to do with it. It's simply that if you're going to offer your opinions, political or otherwise you should be able to back up your argument.

And, I'm sorry you don't like it, but the entire concept is inherently political. It deals with your constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The point of bringing up cars and homes is because law enforcement is not allowed to do to there what they do on the water. Different rules apply, and that's simply wrong.

What I'm trying to explain is why people shouldn't be okay it. You used the words of one of the most totalitarian regimes to ever exist to rationalize your civil rights being violated and I'm not sure why you're mad at me for pointing out the broader context of why it's to your detriment.

 

[george]

Here we go. Another narcissist who thinks the world owes him an explanation if they disagree with him.

Turned a simple thread into yet another political pissing match. Same old, same old.

This subject invites politics. There's just no way around it.