And here I'm talking 8lbs and up. Not on my boat this season, or on most of my friend's boats as well. We've been chewing on this subject for a bit between us and no one has the real skinny. I personally am going with what a certain well-known South Shore charter captain told me in a private conversation, when I put the question directly to him.
His response: "Where are the local biggies? We caught them all."
Well, maybe not all, but most of them, I am convinced.
Sure, I know that some boats have gotten a few good ones this season, but the total numbers do appear to be down, and by a good bit.
Here's what I think in no particular order:
1/ Sport angler "predation" over the past 10 or so seasons. As soon as a rec-caught fish gets to 16", into the box it goes, never to grow to bruiser size. Here I'm as guilty as anyone else.
2/ Live fish marketing - and I'm especially including potting, both legal and illegal.
3/ Roller trawling that has destroyed much of the deep bottom habitat - like a good portion of 17, for example.
4/ the FFL - Look, the plain fact is that I know many guys who participate in this program, while currently having good-paying employment, many with solid 6-figure incomes. With this in mind, please educate me as to the reason they need to go out and buy fancy boats, using the ever-declining tog population as a means of covering a good part of their boat's expenses every Fall?
Of course there are some folks out there that really are in need of the extra income, that might be hurting financially. I do get it. But many others - yeah, not hurting at all. 25 x 15" fish/day for those that don't need the money? Does anybody really think this is a good idea? I'd love to hear and debate a counter-argument, because I believe that given the current thinning of the biomass, this FFL-thing is a HORRIBLE policy. How about this as a possible solution - Means Testing. Make more than a set reported annual income level earned NOT in this fishery, and no FFL for you.
5/ Slow growing breeder fish that were caught back in the 90's and early 2000's and sold off for the extra cash by "Sharpies and 'Masters.'" Again, I'm talking guys and their ilk that at the time made decent money and were just out to make some extra pocket cash. We all know those "high-profile personalities" that bragged back then about pulling many monster breeders, in size and quantity, from their formerly "secret kingpin drops" - those fish were forever removed from the biomass, along with their "larger fish genetic pool."
6/ I also have repeatedly heard some of these same guys taking the position that ". . . you could never fish out a species via hook and line pin fishing." Yeah, I'm calling B.S. on that nonsense as well. To me that comes across as guilty conscience justification. Removing the larger breeding stock can never be a recipe for long-term species viability. And with this slow-growing species, we're seeing the results of that avarice manifested now.
7/ On the plus side, I do think that this species is trying mightily to make a come-back - aided by increasingly tightened recreational regs. Witness the near-endless supply of sub-16" fish that infest most drops, both inshore and off. But without more help addressing the foregoing points, I do think fishing for this species is moving toward a true dictatorial scale-back (or even a shutdown) by the powers that be.
To head this off, I believe that its high time to grant this species full game fish status - and kill off the greed, once and for all.
I understand that this might be goring some well-known personal oxen, but you know what? I couldn't care less. Some things need to be said, and with me now well into my 7th decade, I no longer give a rat's a$$ who I irritate with my thoughts - not to say that I ever really did. . .
Anybody care (dare?) to comment?
His response: "Where are the local biggies? We caught them all."
Well, maybe not all, but most of them, I am convinced.
Sure, I know that some boats have gotten a few good ones this season, but the total numbers do appear to be down, and by a good bit.
Here's what I think in no particular order:
1/ Sport angler "predation" over the past 10 or so seasons. As soon as a rec-caught fish gets to 16", into the box it goes, never to grow to bruiser size. Here I'm as guilty as anyone else.
2/ Live fish marketing - and I'm especially including potting, both legal and illegal.
3/ Roller trawling that has destroyed much of the deep bottom habitat - like a good portion of 17, for example.
4/ the FFL - Look, the plain fact is that I know many guys who participate in this program, while currently having good-paying employment, many with solid 6-figure incomes. With this in mind, please educate me as to the reason they need to go out and buy fancy boats, using the ever-declining tog population as a means of covering a good part of their boat's expenses every Fall?
Of course there are some folks out there that really are in need of the extra income, that might be hurting financially. I do get it. But many others - yeah, not hurting at all. 25 x 15" fish/day for those that don't need the money? Does anybody really think this is a good idea? I'd love to hear and debate a counter-argument, because I believe that given the current thinning of the biomass, this FFL-thing is a HORRIBLE policy. How about this as a possible solution - Means Testing. Make more than a set reported annual income level earned NOT in this fishery, and no FFL for you.
5/ Slow growing breeder fish that were caught back in the 90's and early 2000's and sold off for the extra cash by "Sharpies and 'Masters.'" Again, I'm talking guys and their ilk that at the time made decent money and were just out to make some extra pocket cash. We all know those "high-profile personalities" that bragged back then about pulling many monster breeders, in size and quantity, from their formerly "secret kingpin drops" - those fish were forever removed from the biomass, along with their "larger fish genetic pool."
6/ I also have repeatedly heard some of these same guys taking the position that ". . . you could never fish out a species via hook and line pin fishing." Yeah, I'm calling B.S. on that nonsense as well. To me that comes across as guilty conscience justification. Removing the larger breeding stock can never be a recipe for long-term species viability. And with this slow-growing species, we're seeing the results of that avarice manifested now.
7/ On the plus side, I do think that this species is trying mightily to make a come-back - aided by increasingly tightened recreational regs. Witness the near-endless supply of sub-16" fish that infest most drops, both inshore and off. But without more help addressing the foregoing points, I do think fishing for this species is moving toward a true dictatorial scale-back (or even a shutdown) by the powers that be.
To head this off, I believe that its high time to grant this species full game fish status - and kill off the greed, once and for all.
I understand that this might be goring some well-known personal oxen, but you know what? I couldn't care less. Some things need to be said, and with me now well into my 7th decade, I no longer give a rat's a$$ who I irritate with my thoughts - not to say that I ever really did. . .
Anybody care (dare?) to comment?