Temple Reef X Gravitate 2

george

Administrator
Staff member
This is my first slow-pitch rod, and I'm not getting the "feel" I'm used to with a stiffer rod when bucktailing for fluke. I have it teamed up with a Corado 200 and I'm fishing anywhere from 15-25 feet in the sound. I do like that the long hard head shakes on a larger fish are not as violent, but I'm just not getting that feeling I get with a stiffer rod where I can almost feel them looking at it.

Is there a different jigging approach to use on these slow pitch rods? It is by far the most comfortable rod in my arsenal, it's just I feel I'm missing some fish.


6242
 
I looked hard at both the Temple Reef lines (Levitate $$$$, Gravitate $$), whilst at the Jersey Fishing Expo this past March. The matt purple "Flip-flop" iridescent finish on the Levitate series was especially eye-popping. For me, I was "like a moth to a flame." Stunning. Going in, I had fully intended to add one or the other to my fluke arsenal. Both series are beautifully crafted rods, but disappointingly, neither lineup had an action that would help me with my specific fishing style. In fact I thought they would work against my efforts, as the tip felt too soft to effectively move a 3-4oz bucktail in deep water the way I prefer. Both lines were much too soft for the "snap-type" or "popping-type" jigging that we most frequently utilize for fluke. Again, truly beautiful rods - just not for me. Depressing.

For the slow-pitch jigging style, yup, on the money, and based on my extensive "pre-Expo" research, possibly none better - but that is a completely different "jigging" technique, utilizing nearly the entire rod blank to evoke the "proper" action for that style of fishing. After spending a goodly amount of time doing the eval, and being quite disappointed, I went back to Kilsong's booth and purchased one of his Charter Special slow pitch rods. No where near as "fancy" as the Temple Reef rods, but more to my liking, action-wise. Much less delicate tip action - much better for the fluke jigging style that I employ. I did give my new Black Hole a good workout this past weekend with 3-4oz bucktails - and it performed perfectly, as I anticipated. Didn't get a keeper, but that was more my fault than the rod's. Indians - arrows, and all that. . . :rolleyes:

Back to the subject though, In point of fact I think that even the Shimano Trevala S series is superior to the Temple Reef lines - for the way that most of us here jig fluke. At a fraction of the price.

George - specific to your expressed issues, you are right, you ARE missing bites - because with such a light, bendy blank you will need to swing much harder to move the bucktail with authority into the fish's mouth. Its simple physics, right? If TR would come out with a rod series with slightly more tip power, but the same overall "bend" to the blank, they would have a winner for our inshore fishing. That's my belief, anyways.

Gorgeously constructed and finished rods, though just not right for how I (and maybe you, George) fish.
 
Let's put together a July/August deep trip on my boat - bring your new rod and we can give it a good workout on a day that the wind allows a sub-4oz bucktail. I bet it will work well, with some adjustment to your jigging/hooking technique. I'll be in touch when the time is right.
 
I looked at those rods at the Jersey show with Lep and came to the same conclusion. They are too "soft" to set hooks with 4 & 5 ounces of lead in 90 feet of water and they don't allow for the proper action those jigs need to be effective.

Like Pete said, if they made a few blanks more suited to the way we fish here for fluke, they would be sweet.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Latest articles

Latest posts

Back
Top