Whats going on in the World


A Minnesota farmer worries about the price of fertilizer. A San Diego entrepreneur deals with an unexpected cost increase of remodeling a restaurant. A Midwestern sheet metal fabricator bemoans the prospect of higher aluminum prices.

Businesses knew that Trump’s import taxes -- tariffs -- on America’s biggest trading partners were scheduled to take effect Tuesday. But many of them assumed they’d get a reprieve. After all, the unpredictable president had delayed the tariffs on Canada and Mexico for 30 days right before they were originally supposed to kick in on Feb. 4.

No such luck this time.

At midnight Tuesday, the United States imposed 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico, starting a trade war with its closest neighbors and allies. Trump also doubled his 10% levies on Chinese imports in a series of moves that took U.S. tariffs to the highest level since the 1940s. Canadian energy was shown some mercy, getting taxed at a lower 10%.

The three countries promptly announced retaliatory tariffs of their own.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said later on Tuesday that the U.S. would likely meet Canada and Mexico “in the middle,” with an announcement coming as soon as Wednesday. Lutnick told Fox Business Network the tariffs would not be paused, but that Trump would reach a compromise.

A Small Business Crisis
 
Last edited:

"Barrett, 53, is the youngest justice on the bench, and her nearly five-year record on the Supreme Court has been the subject of furious speculation — and, at times, outright fury."

Conservatives have panned her record as more moderate than that of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she once clerked.

Liberals have been incensed by her reluctance to side more consistently with the court’s left-leaning justices on abortion, federal powers and other seminal cases. Yes, that Constitution gets in the way of the sick left activists.....................

Barrett’s voting record is more moderate than Scalia’s, according to a June New York Times data analysis that found she plays an "increasingly central role" on the court.
Interesting.

Barrett used her time Monday to implore the group of judges to maintain a sense of grace, decorum and respect for colleagues, despite the inevitable, heated disagreements that will occur.
 
he has no idea what he's doing - Art of the Deal my a++


"We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks," he said on Tuesday. "It's possible that he doesn't want to make a deal."

Putin faced a "rough situation" if that were the case, Trump added, without offering any details.

Despite initially pushing for a three-way summit with Putin and Zelensky, Trump is now suggesting "it would be better" if the two leaders initially met without him.

He added that he would attend a meeting with the two leaders "if necessary", but wanted to "see what happens".

The Russian president told Trump on Monday that he was "open" to the idea of direct talks with Ukraine, but the next day Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov watered down that already vague commitment.
 
Yes, that Constitution gets in the way ...

Yes, that Constitution get's in the way, especially the Bill of Rights...

Judge Halts Texas Law Mandating the Ten Commandments in School

The state law had said public schools would have to display the Ten Commandments in a “conspicuous” location in every classroom in Texas by Sept. 1.

A federal judge in Texas temporarily halted on Wednesday a state law that would have required the Ten Commandments to be visibly displayed in every public school classroom by Sept. 1.

The law, passed earlier this year by the Republican-controlled Legislature, mirrors one in Louisiana that was declared “plainly unconstitutional” in June by a panel of judges from the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans. A federal judge also blocked a nearly identical measure in Arkansas this month.

In Texas, 16 families from different faith backgrounds brought the legal challenge. They argued that the law would pressure students to adopt a state-favored religious scripture and that it amounted to a clear violation of the separation of church and state.

The version of the Ten Commandments that the law would have required was drawn from the King James Bible, the families said, and it would not have reflected other religious groups’ interpretations of the Ten Commandments.

Some parents also argued that portions of the commandments are inappropriate for young children, including the lines “thou shalt not commit adultery” and “though shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife.”

“Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions,” Judge Fred Biery of the Western District of Texas wrote in his decision. “Teenage boys, being the curious hormonally driven creatures they are, might ask: ‘Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my parents, but how do I do adultery?’” A smart teacher would suggest that child to write a letter to the President as he's an expert on this topic...

Ken Paxton, the state attorney general, whose office represented most of the school districts that were sued, called the Ten Commandments a “cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage” and vowed to appeal the decision.

The Texas law requires the Ten Commandments be displayed in a “conspicuous” location in each classroom on a typeface visible from anywhere in the classroom. The law mandated that a poster of the commandments be at least 16 inches wide and 20 inches tall and only include the text of the Ten Commandments. Under the law, school districts would be required to accept donations of Ten Commandments posters, and they would be allowed to use district funds to purchase posters.

“The public school is a secular space, and it feels like our freedoms are being encroached upon when students are going to walk into a classroom and immediately be presented with religious doctrine,” said Rabbi Mara Nathan, one of the plaintiffs. Rabbi Nathan, who lives in San Antonio, said the law would also make her child, and other children of different religious backgrounds, feel unwelcome.

Proponents also argue that the Ten Commandments are a historical document that laid the foundation for the modern legal system. And they say that students would not be forced to recite the commandments or change their beliefs simply because they are displayed in school.

“The Constitution does not guarantee citizens a right to entirely avoid ideas with which they disagree,” William Farrell, a lawyer from Mr. Paxton’s office representing some of the school districts, said during a hearing on the Texas case. The displays, he said, “will hang on the wall, and students aren’t required to do anything with them.”

Judge Biery’s ruling applies only to the 11 school districts named in the lawsuit, including the Houston Independent School District, the state’s largest, and the Austin and Plano school districts.
 
I wonder if those few parents are for a dude dressing as a woman and reading (grooming) basic super soft gay porn to them is okay. You know those books that were getting banned and Some Parents fought back. Or it’s the cancel Christmas crowd again. Being the country was founded on Christian principals imo. All other religions should be banned and all should assimilate or gtfo.
 
Yes, that Constitution get's in the way, especially the Bill of Rights...

Judge Halts Texas Law Mandating the Ten Commandments in School

The state law had said public schools would have to display the Ten Commandments in a “conspicuous” location in every classroom in Texas by Sept. 1.

A federal judge in Texas temporarily halted on Wednesday a state law that would have required the Ten Commandments to be visibly displayed in every public school classroom by Sept. 1.

The law, passed earlier this year by the Republican-controlled Legislature, mirrors one in Louisiana that was declared “plainly unconstitutional” in June by a panel of judges from the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans. A federal judge also blocked a nearly identical measure in Arkansas this month.

In Texas, 16 families from different faith backgrounds brought the legal challenge. They argued that the law would pressure students to adopt a state-favored religious scripture and that it amounted to a clear violation of the separation of church and state.

The version of the Ten Commandments that the law would have required was drawn from the King James Bible, the families said, and it would not have reflected other religious groups’ interpretations of the Ten Commandments.

Some parents also argued that portions of the commandments are inappropriate for young children, including the lines “thou shalt not commit adultery” and “though shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife.”

“Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions,” Judge Fred Biery of the Western District of Texas wrote in his decision. “Teenage boys, being the curious hormonally driven creatures they are, might ask: ‘Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my parents, but how do I do adultery?’” A smart teacher would suggest that child to write a letter to the President as he's an expert on this topic...

Ken Paxton, the state attorney general, whose office represented most of the school districts that were sued, called the Ten Commandments a “cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage” and vowed to appeal the decision.

The Texas law requires the Ten Commandments be displayed in a “conspicuous” location in each classroom on a typeface visible from anywhere in the classroom. The law mandated that a poster of the commandments be at least 16 inches wide and 20 inches tall and only include the text of the Ten Commandments. Under the law, school districts would be required to accept donations of Ten Commandments posters, and they would be allowed to use district funds to purchase posters.

“The public school is a secular space, and it feels like our freedoms are being encroached upon when students are going to walk into a classroom and immediately be presented with religious doctrine,” said Rabbi Mara Nathan, one of the plaintiffs. Rabbi Nathan, who lives in San Antonio, said the law would also make her child, and other children of different religious backgrounds, feel unwelcome.

Proponents also argue that the Ten Commandments are a historical document that laid the foundation for the modern legal system. And they say that students would not be forced to recite the commandments or change their beliefs simply because they are displayed in school.

“The Constitution does not guarantee citizens a right to entirely avoid ideas with which they disagree,” William Farrell, a lawyer from Mr. Paxton’s office representing some of the school districts, said during a hearing on the Texas case. The displays, he said, “will hang on the wall, and students aren’t required to do anything with them.”

Judge Biery’s ruling applies only to the 11 school districts named in the lawsuit, including the Houston Independent School District, the state’s largest, and the Austin and Plano school districts.
Seems like a few districts, not the whole state. That tells you something. This is what keeps people up at night wasting their school district dollars??
 
Seems like a few districts, not the whole state. That tells you something. This is what keeps people up at night wasting their school district dollars??
Concern for the 1st Amendment IS something that should keep all Americans up.

You’re rationalizing clearly unconstitutional activity. Going to support denying birthright citizenship next? Consult that pesky 14th Amendment, something that’s been unsuccessfully challenged before…
 
Last edited:
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top