Whats going on in the World

Hey look at that. You can kill right up to birth now in Massachusetts.​

House Passes Bill to Strengthen Abortion Care​


Summarize

The Massachusetts House of Representatives today passed a bill updating state law governing abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy, ensuring that physicians can provide medically necessary abortion care based on their professional medical judgment.

Dozens of patients annually are forced to travel out of state to obtain abortion care later in pregnancy because of existing legal restrictions, according to Reproductive Equity Now. This legislation helps ensure that patients can receive medical care in Massachusetts from their providers.

“This legislation is about ensuring that in Massachusetts, reproductive health care decisions are made exclusively by the patient and her doctor — unencumbered by a legal framework that, in practice, isn’t always capable of accounting for the complexity and uncertainty inherent to pregnancy-related health care,” said House Speaker Ronald J. Mariano (D-Quincy). “These reforms will ensure that Massachusetts remains steadfast in our commitment to protecting a woman’s right to choose. I want to thank Chair Michlewitz, Chair Day, Chair Barber, and Representative Sabadosa for working to uplift the voices of women who have endured unimaginable hardships during their pregnancies, as well as all my colleagues in the House for ensuring that Massachusetts remains a national leader in protecting access to reproductive health care.”

“As women’s rights face continued attacks from both the Federal government and other states, we here in the Commonwealth will continue to do to protect these rights. By centering these conversations between an individual and a physician, we will ensure every patient gets the care they need without unnecessary obstacles,” said Representative Aaron Michlewitz (D-Boston), Chair of the House Committee on Ways & Means. “We will not hesitate to act to protect reproductive rights and to ensure that our providers and patients are protected from being prevented from offering this critical form of healthcare. I want to thank Speaker Mariano, and all my other House colleagues for their continued support and commitment to this critical issue.”

“Our residents are the healthiest and Massachusetts is the number one state in the nation for healthcare because we continue to prioritize the professional medical judgment of our physicians and the health of our patients,” said Representative Michael S. Day (D-Stoneham), Chair of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary. “This bill reaffirms our commitment that Massachusetts allows our doctors to treat their patients by relying on their trained, professional judgment without fear, and it ensures that any patient can access the care they need without having to overcome potentially harmful restrictions not related to their health.”

“Throughout relentless attacks on reproductive rights, the Massachusetts House has prioritized the fundamental rights and health care of its residents,” said Representative Christine P. Barber (D-Somerville), sponsor of the bill. “This bill continues that work – it ensures access to care by empowering physicians to use their professional judgment to make decisions in the best interest of their patients. Pregnancy is complex, and this bill eliminates barriers and guarantees medical expertise as the standard of care. It comes down to a simple, but powerful conviction: decisions about abortion care must remain between a patient and their provider. No one else. With today’s vote, the House shows our commitment to protecting the rights of our residents of the Commonwealth.”

"The goal of passing this legislation is simple. Medical decisions should be made by a patient and their doctor,” said Representative Lindsay N. Sabadosa (D-Northampton), sponsor of the bill. “Massachusetts has one of the best health care systems in the country, and patients should be able to rely on their providers to deliver medically appropriate care without restrictions that can fail to account for the complexity of individual medical circumstances. By removing those barriers, we can ensure that no one has to leave Massachusetts to receive the care they need."

The bill passed today removes existing requirements that limit abortions at 24 weeks of pregnancy or later to specific medical circumstances, allowing licensed physicians to rely on their best medical judgment when caring for patients. Under current law, those circumstances must adhere to only four specific categories, which do not account for the full spectrum of medical conditions encountered by women and their doctors: protecting the patient's life or physical or mental health, or cases involving a lethal fetal anomaly or a grave fetal diagnosis.

Building on protections first enacted into law in 2022 and expanded in 2025, the bill prohibits third-party medical review processes from overriding medical treatment decisions made jointly by a patient, or their health care proxy, and their treating physician. The bill also permits treating physicians to perform these procedures in health care treatment centers in addition to hospitals, meeting the patients where they are seeking health care treatment.

The legislation passed the House of Representatives 119-33 and now goes to the Senate for consideration.
 

Hey look at that. You can kill right up to birth now in Massachusetts.​

House Passes Bill to Strengthen Abortion Care​


Summarize

The Massachusetts House of Representatives today passed a bill updating state law governing abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy, ensuring that physicians can provide medically necessary abortion care based on their professional medical judgment.

Dozens of patients annually are forced to travel out of state to obtain abortion care later in pregnancy because of existing legal restrictions, according to Reproductive Equity Now. This legislation helps ensure that patients can receive medical care in Massachusetts from their providers.

“This legislation is about ensuring that in Massachusetts, reproductive health care decisions are made exclusively by the patient and her doctor — unencumbered by a legal framework that, in practice, isn’t always capable of accounting for the complexity and uncertainty inherent to pregnancy-related health care,” said House Speaker Ronald J. Mariano (D-Quincy). “These reforms will ensure that Massachusetts remains steadfast in our commitment to protecting a woman’s right to choose. I want to thank Chair Michlewitz, Chair Day, Chair Barber, and Representative Sabadosa for working to uplift the voices of women who have endured unimaginable hardships during their pregnancies, as well as all my colleagues in the House for ensuring that Massachusetts remains a national leader in protecting access to reproductive health care.”

“As women’s rights face continued attacks from both the Federal government and other states, we here in the Commonwealth will continue to do to protect these rights. By centering these conversations between an individual and a physician, we will ensure every patient gets the care they need without unnecessary obstacles,” said Representative Aaron Michlewitz (D-Boston), Chair of the House Committee on Ways & Means. “We will not hesitate to act to protect reproductive rights and to ensure that our providers and patients are protected from being prevented from offering this critical form of healthcare. I want to thank Speaker Mariano, and all my other House colleagues for their continued support and commitment to this critical issue.”

“Our residents are the healthiest and Massachusetts is the number one state in the nation for healthcare because we continue to prioritize the professional medical judgment of our physicians and the health of our patients,” said Representative Michael S. Day (D-Stoneham), Chair of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary. “This bill reaffirms our commitment that Massachusetts allows our doctors to treat their patients by relying on their trained, professional judgment without fear, and it ensures that any patient can access the care they need without having to overcome potentially harmful restrictions not related to their health.”

“Throughout relentless attacks on reproductive rights, the Massachusetts House has prioritized the fundamental rights and health care of its residents,” said Representative Christine P. Barber (D-Somerville), sponsor of the bill. “This bill continues that work – it ensures access to care by empowering physicians to use their professional judgment to make decisions in the best interest of their patients. Pregnancy is complex, and this bill eliminates barriers and guarantees medical expertise as the standard of care. It comes down to a simple, but powerful conviction: decisions about abortion care must remain between a patient and their provider. No one else. With today’s vote, the House shows our commitment to protecting the rights of our residents of the Commonwealth.”

"The goal of passing this legislation is simple. Medical decisions should be made by a patient and their doctor,” said Representative Lindsay N. Sabadosa (D-Northampton), sponsor of the bill. “Massachusetts has one of the best health care systems in the country, and patients should be able to rely on their providers to deliver medically appropriate care without restrictions that can fail to account for the complexity of individual medical circumstances. By removing those barriers, we can ensure that no one has to leave Massachusetts to receive the care they need."

The bill passed today removes existing requirements that limit abortions at 24 weeks of pregnancy or later to specific medical circumstances, allowing licensed physicians to rely on their best medical judgment when caring for patients. Under current law, those circumstances must adhere to only four specific categories, which do not account for the full spectrum of medical conditions encountered by women and their doctors: protecting the patient's life or physical or mental health, or cases involving a lethal fetal anomaly or a grave fetal diagnosis.

Building on protections first enacted into law in 2022 and expanded in 2025, the bill prohibits third-party medical review processes from overriding medical treatment decisions made jointly by a patient, or their health care proxy, and their treating physician. The bill also permits treating physicians to perform these procedures in health care treatment centers in addition to hospitals, meeting the patients where they are seeking health care treatment.

The legislation passed the House of Representatives 119-33 and now goes to the Senate for consideration.
I saw that. The living, breathing, child could be on its way out and still, well, you know.
 

The WNBA has punted on its high-stakes meetings of the minds in the wake of the two former NBA players declaring for the draft, and will instead use the next "weeks and months" to further discuss one very important question:

"What is a woman?"

Let me say that again: The WOMEN'S National Basketball Association just met for several days, and emerged from those meetings still unable to define what a WOMAN is.
Please define what a woman is.
 
It is answered. Type into your friend the AI. Right before your eyes. If you need me for help, that is pretty sad.................
Telling someone to look it up on AI which is for all intents and purposes, a modern day and encyclopedia, is not answering the question.

The question cannot be answered very simply. I don’t blame you for avoiding the question by deflecting from it. It’s a rabbit hole of a question.
 
It's been made into that in recent years by the woke crowd.
And also by the thousands of people that were born, and the doctor couldn’t tell what sex they were they made a split second decision right there at birth. Also, the many people that were born with both male and female chromosomes and genitalia of both sexes..

It was only a few hundred years ago that everyone thought the Earth was flat. But science proved them wrong, or perhaps it was the woke generation of that time??
 
And also by the thousands of people that were born, and the doctor couldn’t tell what sex they were they made a split second decision right there at birth. Also, the many people that were born with both male and female chromosomes and genitalia of both sexes..

It was only a few hundred years ago that everyone thought the Earth was flat. But science proved them wrong, or perhaps it was the woke generation of that time??

We did this already. Nobody is complaining about the unfortunate folks with a physical anomaly. They're talking about biological men trying to play on the girls team and creep around in their bathrooms. Jeez.
 
We need a :rollseyes: emoji.....
1786646690726.webp
 
We did this already. Nobody is complaining about the unfortunate folks with a physical anomaly. They're talking about biological men trying to play on the girls team and creep around in their bathrooms. Jeez.
Agreed, and I’m not for any of that stuff, but my question still remains unanswered here. Its a very complex subject.

I think someone may chime in and offer a solution to this problem……. Gather them all up, blindfold them, and have them walk off the roofs of 4 story buildings, with gays, Z- Jews, the colored’s, the illegals, the dreamers, fsggots, anyone that speaks Spanish, and anyone that is “different.”
 
It’s really a non issue. Last time I checked I think there were perhaps 6 or 7 trans athletes playing in NCAA Sports. But politicians like to get people all riled up over a nothing burger with lies about schools promoting and making kids go “trans” etc., etc.
 


Far from lies, "nothing burger" etc.

It is call "grooming." And it is real. And sick.
 
It’s really a non issue. Last time I checked I think there were perhaps 6 or 7 trans athletes playing in NCAA Sports. But politicians like to get people all riled up over a nothing burger with lies about schools promoting and making kids go “trans” etc., etc.

Honestly, even one is too many. It's a door that needs to be shut. Otherwise women's sports and Title 9 are meaningless. Girls face physical risks, and lose opportunities for advancement and scholarships when some inadequate male decides to play as a girl.

To be fair, WAY too many feminists kept repeating the BS that there was no difference between men and women. Hopefully the militants are regretting it now. Although in some cases it was part of the agenda that now claims people's imaginary identity creates reality.
 

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top