Coronavirus

Interesting set of studies around T-Cells in this Business Insider Article. Looks like they reference the actual studies with links to them in the article.


Actually got and read a pre-print of the Cell article yesterday. It's positive news for sure...
 
And it begins...

Person with COVID-19 may have infected others at Sturgis motorcycle rally
pressherald.com/2020/08/20/person-with-covid-19-may-have-infected-others-at-sturgis-motorcycle-rally/

By Hannah KnowlesWashington PostAugust 20, 2020

As hundreds of thousands flocked to rural South Dakota for a motorcycle rally this month, sparking fears of a coronavirus super-spreader event, photos captured people crowding the streets without masks and packing local businesses – including a bar on Main Street, One-Eyed Jack’s Saloon.

Now state health officials say a person who visited One-Eyed Jack’s for about five hours has tested positive for the coronavirus, and could have transmitted the virus to others at the time.

Experts have singled out bars as places ripe for spreading COVID-19, and the exposures could be just the beginning of health consequences stemming from the annual Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, a 10-day extravaganza that draws people from around the country and is hugely important to the local economy.

With the coronavirus still rampant in many parts of the U.S. over the summer, most Sturgis residents polled by the city were against holding the rally from Aug. 7-16.
Virus_Outbreak_Sturgis_Rally_89673
Bikers ride through downtown Sturgis, S.D., on Friday, Aug. 7. AP Photo/Stephen Groves

But Christina Steele, a spokeswoman for the city of Sturgis, said Thursday that she’s not concerned by the news about the virus case, echoing the attitudes many bikers expressed at the rally. Local officials had asked visitors to social-distance and wear masks but did not mandate those precautions at one of the biggest public gatherings of the pandemic.

“It could be one or two, could be more,” Steele said of coronavirus cases linked to the event. “But you know, it’s to be expected. Coronavirus is in South Dakota. It has been for months.”

“It was a good rally,” she told The Washington Post. “People had fun.”

Few details on the infected person at One-Eyed Jack’s were available in a brief news release, and beyond that, the rally’s contributions to coronavirus exposures are not yet clear. Coronavirus symptoms can take from two to 14 days to show up after exposure, experts say, meaning that infections stemming from the event could still be emerging.

State health officials did not say where the person is from or how many people may have exposed at the bar or at the broader rally. According to Sturgis, 462,182 vehicles were counted entering its limits over the course of the event, representing just a 7.5% dip from last year’s traffic.

The person visited the saloon from noon to 5:30 p.m. on Aug. 11 while they were able to transmit the virus to others, the release states. Others who were there at the time should “monitor for symptoms” for 14 days, it adds.

The South Dakota Department of Health did not immediately answer questions about the case and any contact-tracing around it, but said it will address the matter at a news conference.

The state’s coronavirus dashboard shows that new, known coronavirus cases in Meade County, which includes Sturgis, have risen since the rally began, though daily cases remain in the single digits. While new infections have remained fairly steady for South Dakota as a whole over the past two weeks, average new infections in Meade County have ticked up from about two per day to four per day.

On Monday, the latest day for which data is posted, the county reported a record of nine new cases.
City officials are not involved in investigating COVID-19 exposures at One-Eyed Jack’s, said Steele, the city spokeswoman. She said she is not aware of other infected people at the rally.

While some residents expressed concerns during the rally to the media, decrying the absence of masks, Steele told The Post the city has not gotten many comments from residents, beyond her own chats with a couple of people who said they felt attendees were “relaxed and happy to be there.”
 
Now for some good news, directly contributed by fishermen!!


This Trawler’s Haul: Evidence That Antibodies Block the Coronavirus

Three crew members aboard were spared when the virus spread through the boat. They were the only ones who had antibodies at the beginning of the trip.



The American Dynasty, carrying 122 crew, returned to shore in May after 18 days at sea when a crew member became ill enough to need hospitalization.

The American Dynasty, carrying 122 crew, returned to shore in May after 18 days at sea when a crew member became ill enough to need hospitalization. Credit...Michael Brunk/nwlens.com

By Apoorva Mandavilli
  • Aug. 19, 2020

A fishing vessel that left Seattle in May returned with an unexpected catch: the first direct evidence in humans that antibodies to the coronavirus can thwart infection.

More than a hundred crew members aboard the American Dynasty were stricken by the infection over 18 days at sea. But three sailors who initially carried antibodies remained virus-free, according to a new report.

Although the study is small, it addresses one of the most important questions in the pandemic: whether the immune response to one bout with the virus protects against reinfection.

“Knowing the answer to this question is critical for vaccine design and epidemiology,” tweeted Jesse Bloom, an evolutionary biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and one of the study’s authors.

The study was posted online last week and has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Still, the finding set off optimistic chatter among scientists, who have been relying on monkey studies for evidence of antibodies’ potency.

“I thought it was very exciting — good enough news that I was telling my family about it,” said Michal Tal, an immunologist at Stanford University who was not involved in the work.

Several research teams have reported that an encounter with the virus triggers a robust immune response in most people, including in those who may have been only mildly ill. And the vaccine candidates now in trials also seem to elicit strong neutralizing antibodies, the kind that can block the virus.

But the amount of those antibodies needed to prevent the virus from returning is unclear. Scientists measure neutralizing antibodies in titers, an indication of their concentration in the blood.

The three sailors who remained protected from the virus had widely varying titers; two had only moderate quantities, a finding the researchers said was reassuring.

“People have been so worried about the titers, and the titers going down,” Dr. Alexander Greninger, a virologist at the University of Washington in Seattle, said.

The results indicate even moderate titers prevented reinfection in a situation in which exposure to the virus was high, he said: “These are attainable titers, right? Hopefully, it’ll be helpful to see, and makes make me very optimistic about the vaccines.”


The American Dynasty carried 113 men and nine women. All crew members had been tested for both virus and antibodies as part of a routine screening before setting sail. (The researchers did not have access to the results from two members.)

The trawler returned to shore after 18 days at sea when a crew member became ill enough to need hospitalization. The sailors were tested for the presence of virus and antibodies again and for up to 50 days after their return.

The three sailors confirmed to have neutralizing antibodies did not test positive for the virus during the course of the study; 103 of the remaining 117 became infected.

These numbers may be small, but they’re highly significant, Dr. Greninger said.

“A lot of people, when they see this are like, ‘Oh come on, it could be due to random chance,’” he said. In fact, the likelihood that the results are just chance is extremely low, he added.

Other experts agreed. “Just looking at the numbers, it becomes clear that it’s unlikely that all of these three people were protected by chance,” said Florian Krammer, an immunologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.
 
Now for some good news, directly contributed by fishermen!!


This Trawler’s Haul: Evidence That Antibodies Block the Coronavirus

Three crew members aboard were spared when the virus spread through the boat. They were the only ones who had antibodies at the beginning of the trip.



The American Dynasty, carrying 122 crew, returned to shore in May after 18 days at sea when a crew member became ill enough to need hospitalization.

The American Dynasty, carrying 122 crew, returned to shore in May after 18 days at sea when a crew member became ill enough to need hospitalization. Credit...Michael Brunk/nwlens.com

By Apoorva Mandavilli
  • Aug. 19, 2020

A fishing vessel that left Seattle in May returned with an unexpected catch: the first direct evidence in humans that antibodies to the coronavirus can thwart infection.

More than a hundred crew members aboard the American Dynasty were stricken by the infection over 18 days at sea. But three sailors who initially carried antibodies remained virus-free, according to a new report.

Although the study is small, it addresses one of the most important questions in the pandemic: whether the immune response to one bout with the virus protects against reinfection.

“Knowing the answer to this question is critical for vaccine design and epidemiology,” tweeted Jesse Bloom, an evolutionary biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and one of the study’s authors.

The study was posted online last week and has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Still, the finding set off optimistic chatter among scientists, who have been relying on monkey studies for evidence of antibodies’ potency.

“I thought it was very exciting — good enough news that I was telling my family about it,” said Michal Tal, an immunologist at Stanford University who was not involved in the work.

Several research teams have reported that an encounter with the virus triggers a robust immune response in most people, including in those who may have been only mildly ill. And the vaccine candidates now in trials also seem to elicit strong neutralizing antibodies, the kind that can block the virus.

But the amount of those antibodies needed to prevent the virus from returning is unclear. Scientists measure neutralizing antibodies in titers, an indication of their concentration in the blood.

The three sailors who remained protected from the virus had widely varying titers; two had only moderate quantities, a finding the researchers said was reassuring.

“People have been so worried about the titers, and the titers going down,” Dr. Alexander Greninger, a virologist at the University of Washington in Seattle, said.

The results indicate even moderate titers prevented reinfection in a situation in which exposure to the virus was high, he said: “These are attainable titers, right? Hopefully, it’ll be helpful to see, and makes make me very optimistic about the vaccines.”


The American Dynasty carried 113 men and nine women. All crew members had been tested for both virus and antibodies as part of a routine screening before setting sail. (The researchers did not have access to the results from two members.)

The trawler returned to shore after 18 days at sea when a crew member became ill enough to need hospitalization. The sailors were tested for the presence of virus and antibodies again and for up to 50 days after their return.

The three sailors confirmed to have neutralizing antibodies did not test positive for the virus during the course of the study; 103 of the remaining 117 became infected.

These numbers may be small, but they’re highly significant, Dr. Greninger said.

“A lot of people, when they see this are like, ‘Oh come on, it could be due to random chance,’” he said. In fact, the likelihood that the results are just chance is extremely low, he added.

Other experts agreed. “Just looking at the numbers, it becomes clear that it’s unlikely that all of these three people were protected by chance,” said Florian Krammer, an immunologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.


so I guess it would be cool to fish the Mudhole with two friends who have already had COVID & have antibodies - cool
(y)
 
So got back from our Thursday night soccer practice with the kids. Parents were chatting up. Afterwards, we discussed some of the school reopening plans. One of the parents mentioned that one of the school districts in Nassau County, (either Bethpage or Jericho) is going to have the kids were Face Sheilds throughout the day. I guess kind of like a welders face shield (without the helmet) and made of Plexiglas. Along those lines I saw that one of the major universities just received FDA approval for their face shield design.

As expected, there was a lot of "WTF is going on" comments from every parent.
 
So got back from our Thursday night soccer practice with the kids. Parents were chatting up. Afterwards, we discussed some of the school reopening plans. One of the parents mentioned that one of the school districts in Nassau County, (either Bethpage or Jericho) is going to have the kids were Face Sheilds throughout the day. I guess kind of like a welders face shield (without the helmet) and made of Plexiglas. Along those lines I saw that one of the major universities just received FDA approval for their face shield design.

As expected, there was a lot of "WTF is going on" comments from every parent.
I know most districts are having public (virtual) meetings to address the concerns of parents and students. Have they been involved with that process? If what you're saying is true ( I do not live in those districts), sounds like districts are concerned about the safety and welfare of faculty, students, and all of their respective families!
Maybe, just maybe, that's "WTF is going on".
 
This is interesting. Hope Herd Immunity is closer to 50%, but not optimistic. From Monday's NYTimes...


What if ‘Herd Immunity’ Is Closer Than Scientists Thought?
In what may be the world’s most important math puzzle, researchers are trying to figure out how many people in a community must be immune before the coronavirus fades.

We’ve known from the beginning how the end will arrive. Eventually, the coronavirus will be unable to find enough susceptible hosts to survive, fading out wherever it briefly emerges.

To achieve so-called herd immunity — the point at which the virus can no longer spread widely because there are not enough vulnerable humans — scientists have suggested that perhaps 70 percent of a given population must be immune, through vaccination or because they survived the infection.

Now some researchers are wrestling with a hopeful possibility. In interviews with The New York Times, more than a dozen scientists said that the threshold is likely to be much lower: just 50 percent, perhaps even less. If that’s true, then it may be possible to turn back the coronavirus more quickly than once thought.

The new estimates result from complicated statistical modeling of the pandemic, and the models have all taken divergent approaches, yielding inconsistent estimates. It is not certain that any community in the world has enough residents now immune to the virus to resist a second wave.
 
I know most districts are having public (virtual) meetings to address the concerns of parents and students. Have they been involved with that process? If what you're saying is true ( I do not live in those districts), sounds like districts are concerned about the safety and welfare of faculty, students, and all of their respective families!
Maybe, just maybe, that's "WTF is going on".

The "WTF" comments from the parents, are geared towards total disbelief that schools will subject kids to wearing f'in plexiglas face masks! And how we have totally devolved.
Here is a novel idea...lets put all school age kids in full Hazmat suites! Why not??Or better yet, lets put them all in a bubble.
The insanity is incredible.
 
I don't know where the school year is going or where it will end up. I do know that my Grand Kids are 13 & 17, and they are more afraid of going back, than their Parents are of sending them.
John
 
And that's the problem right there. You try and make the argument by using the most ridiculous arguments. How is a face mask equivalent to a hazmat suit. How about we just shoot anyone that tests positive. Bet it would put this whole covid thing to rest. SMH.
 
Drop you guard and masks, ignore social distancing and gathering orders and VOILA!! FYI, Millinocket is WAY ABOVE the "Toothline"...

After wedding in Millinocket, 28 test positive for COVID-19
pressherald.com/2020/08/17/maine-cdc-reports-29-cases-no-additional-deaths/

By Eric RussellStaff WriterAugust 17, 2020

At least 28 people associated with a wedding reception held on Aug. 7 at the Big Moose Inn in Millinocket have tested positive for COVID-19.

Eighteen of those individuals attended the reception and another 10 had close contact with attendees, the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention said. All are Maine residents.

“Maine CDC continues to conduct case investigations and contact tracing for guests, staff, and people who potentially came in close contact with confirmed cases during and after the event,” the agency said in a news release Monday. “Anyone who attended an event at Big Moose Inn on August 7, 2020, and who has symptoms of COVID-19 should call their health care provider before seeking medical care.”

Approximately 65 people attended the event. It wasn’t clear if the reception was held indoors or outside, but current state restrictions call for gatherings to be limited to 50 people inside and 100 people outside. Face coverings are also supposed to be worn in public settings when physical distancing is not possible.

The Maine CDC said it is in contact with Big Moose Inn about the nature of the event and adherence to state requirements. Director Dr. Nirav Shah is expected to address the outbreak during a briefing Tuesday.

A message left with the manager of the Big Moose Inn was not returned Monday.

Robert Peterson, CEO of Millinocket Regional Hospital, said all the individuals who have tested positive so far are being treated as out-patients and have not required hospitalization. Peterson also said testing was ongoing at the hospital’s main campus and at a satellite clinic in East Millinocket and he expected the number of cases to increase. Everyone who attended the wedding who has not been tested is being asked to quarantine for 14 days.

“As our situation continues to evolve, so will our response,” he said. “We will be constantly monitoring the data and catering our response accordingly.”

Although summer in Maine is typically a busy time for weddings, the pandemic has forced many couples to postpone their events. Still, this is the second known outbreak associated with a wedding. Six out-of-state guests who attended a private wedding in Castine in June tested positive.

Apparently the Grim Reaper was a wedding guest...

Woman dies of COVID-19 she contracted from someone who attended Millinocket wedding
pressherald.com/2020/08/21/maine-reports-a-death-and-34-new-covid-19-cases-highest-daily-total-in-three-weeks/

By EDWARD D. MURPHY AND ERIC RUSSELLSTAFF WRITERSAugust 21, 2020
Mount Katahdin provides a backdrop to Katahdin Avenue in Millinocket in this 2017 photo. An inn in Millinocket has been cited by the state for holding an indoor gathering with more than 50 people after a COVID-19 outbreak was traced to a wedding reception held there.

A woman died of COVID-19 on Friday after contracting the illness from someone who attended a crowded wedding reception in Millinocket on Aug. 7.

Millinocket Regional Hospital said Friday that a woman who had been admitted to the hospital after developing COVID-19, the illness caused by the coronavirus, died early Friday afternoon.

The hospital did not identify the woman and a spokesman said Friday that she had contracted the coronavirus from someone who attended the reception on Aug. 7, but did not attend it herself.

On Thursday, state officials issued an “imminent health hazard” citation against Big Moose Inn for hosting the reception, which was attended by 65 people. State rules limit indoor gatherings to 50 people.
The citation does not come with any fine, but the inn could be fined or face temporary license suspensions if state officials determine they violate health rules again.

The hospital said it has tested 366 people who attended the reception or came in contact with those who did. The hospital said it has gotten results back on 263 of the tests and the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention said Thursday that 32 have tested positive for COVID-19. The hospital said it is still waiting for results on 103 tests.

Those who tested positive were contacted, the hospital said, provided instructions on their care and told to quarantine themselves.

A woman who answered the phone at Big Moose Inn Friday night said she had no comment and that the inn was contacting a lawyer.
 

Health Officials in South Dakota, Nebraska, & Minnesota have traced multiple Covid 19 cases back to the motor cycle rally in Sturgis. So far they have traced 15 new cases in Nebraska, 7 in Minnesota, & several in South Dakota.
John
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Members online

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top