Savvy18
Angler
FULL DISCLOSURE: I recently saw this topic being bandied about on FB and thought it would be interesting to hear the opinions of NY Angler members.
So, what are your thoughts regarding guys that make long road trips to catch trophy fish away from their "local" fishing locales? Some of the guys commenting on FB called it cheating. How do you see it?
To me, the "trophy" fish conversation doesn't extend past fluke & tog. These are the only two local species I target that I even consider when the topic goes to trophy fishing. Stripers, sea bass, porgy, weakfish, blue demons (inshore) & pelagic fish are not even on my radar anymore. While I still do make as many striped bass trips as I can in the spring, I wouldn't say I do it in pursuit of a trophy fish. I just don't care that much when it comes to bass. If a 50 or 60 comes along, I'd be very happy but I'm not targeting them for that sole purpose. Tog & fluke are a different animal. Those fish I specifically target with a particular mindset. Biggest fish on the lightest possible tackle. Goal 1, is to surpass my own personal best fish. Goal 2, do it on the lightest gear I can (that includes, rods, reels, line, jigs & sinkers). When those criteria are met, I'm a happy fisherman.
Which brings me to the topic at hand. Is traveling to far off destinations to catch bigger fish cheating? I don't see it that way. But I do think every fisherman has individual parameters that dictate what "success" is to him / her. Not everyone is a lunatic like myself and feel they HAVE TO catch the bigger fish on ultra light gear for it to be rewarding. It boils down to relativity I guess. If you catch a 14 lb. fluke dragging bait and using 16 ounces of lead or bouncing 8 ounce jigs, are you going to be satisfied? Are you going to feel a sense of personal accomplishment? I would guess that an overwhelming majority of anglers would be ecstatic with that achievement. As they should be. However, there are some anglers that believe catching an 8 lb. fluke on a 1/2 ounce jig with ultra light tackle is a more rewarding experience. Perhaps the only way to truly know is to have done both
. So far, I have not been able to make a 10+ fluke happen on ANY size jig. I came close with a 9.25 lb. fish on a 2 ounce Spro a few years ago on my lightest Phenix rod, Okuma Serrano 200 reel and 8 lb. test Cortland Master Braid! I've also caught numerous 10+ tog on my lightest CTS & Daiwa Proteus rods - but I'm looking for 15+ on those sticks! It's what keeps me motivated...
Speaking from personal experience, I have NOT made the long trips to catch my "trophy" fish and it definitely intrigues me to do so. ESPECIALLY if I could employ my ultra light tactics. Going on the road with a few friends and getting away for a couple days is always fun. Fishing & seeing new places is very cool. These days my big excitement is a trip or two out to Montauk when the fluking is hot (and even that is hard to get done).
Love to hear what you guys think. Is it really cheating? And more importantly, would you feel satisfied?
So, what are your thoughts regarding guys that make long road trips to catch trophy fish away from their "local" fishing locales? Some of the guys commenting on FB called it cheating. How do you see it?
To me, the "trophy" fish conversation doesn't extend past fluke & tog. These are the only two local species I target that I even consider when the topic goes to trophy fishing. Stripers, sea bass, porgy, weakfish, blue demons (inshore) & pelagic fish are not even on my radar anymore. While I still do make as many striped bass trips as I can in the spring, I wouldn't say I do it in pursuit of a trophy fish. I just don't care that much when it comes to bass. If a 50 or 60 comes along, I'd be very happy but I'm not targeting them for that sole purpose. Tog & fluke are a different animal. Those fish I specifically target with a particular mindset. Biggest fish on the lightest possible tackle. Goal 1, is to surpass my own personal best fish. Goal 2, do it on the lightest gear I can (that includes, rods, reels, line, jigs & sinkers). When those criteria are met, I'm a happy fisherman.
Which brings me to the topic at hand. Is traveling to far off destinations to catch bigger fish cheating? I don't see it that way. But I do think every fisherman has individual parameters that dictate what "success" is to him / her. Not everyone is a lunatic like myself and feel they HAVE TO catch the bigger fish on ultra light gear for it to be rewarding. It boils down to relativity I guess. If you catch a 14 lb. fluke dragging bait and using 16 ounces of lead or bouncing 8 ounce jigs, are you going to be satisfied? Are you going to feel a sense of personal accomplishment? I would guess that an overwhelming majority of anglers would be ecstatic with that achievement. As they should be. However, there are some anglers that believe catching an 8 lb. fluke on a 1/2 ounce jig with ultra light tackle is a more rewarding experience. Perhaps the only way to truly know is to have done both

Speaking from personal experience, I have NOT made the long trips to catch my "trophy" fish and it definitely intrigues me to do so. ESPECIALLY if I could employ my ultra light tactics. Going on the road with a few friends and getting away for a couple days is always fun. Fishing & seeing new places is very cool. These days my big excitement is a trip or two out to Montauk when the fluking is hot (and even that is hard to get done).
Love to hear what you guys think. Is it really cheating? And more importantly, would you feel satisfied?