Do fish strike lures to eat them or target lures based on forage?

senkosam

New Angler
Quote
Originally Posted by CrappiePappy View Post
What makes fish bite (IMHO) : hunger / anger / territorial protection
That may be, but how do you chose lures based on that? Assigning reasons/motives or emotions fish strike lures, assumes fish reason - and thereby are capable of logic or that fish get angry and are thereby emotional as seen in animals with larger and more complex brains.

Beyond assigning the above reasons or labels for attacks on lures in particular comes the nitty gritty of what exactly was it about the lure - by way of description - when fish struck it at that moment or hour in that place. Again, experienced anglers realize the significance of a lure's size, shape, action and color - combined, that possibly helped to initiate strikes.

A more detailed description includes a specific lure action - inherent or angler imparted; color brightness or transparency; shape such as slim, round or flat; weight - either the lure's or the weight of a sinker or jig; lure speed and the type of retrieve chosen for that lure.

For example, a lure I would never believe capable of catching panfish would be one that was too heavy, too large, that had the wrong action no matter the retrieve or any lure that had to be worked too fast. Lure details take precedence over any generalities one may assign as to why fish strike certain lures but weren't provoked to strike others.
BTW, fish are not line-shy. If the diameter of a line is too large, it may affect lure action. If fish don't get put off by treble hooks, why would they line. I've been using 20 lb test, fluorescent chartreuse braid with no difference in the catch.

Basically though we assume it is because that fish saw that lure as food or a threat

Of course you know what they say about that those that ass-u-me.
nonono.gif

The only reason I swap lures is for variety - not because fish stopped biting them for whatever reason or excuse one may give. The only guesses I make are in regard to possible fish holding areas in a water. In order to up the odds of finding fish - starting with baitfish locations - is to know waters fished over time. This involves discovering a multitude of facts about a lake or pond that may differ widely from one another. It includes:

knowing everything about the bottom in all parts of the lake such as depths in feet (shallows vs deep areas), flats, humps, points, steep shorelines, bottom composition, weed areas, inflow streams/ old channels, old rock walls, stumps, etc. The only way to do this is with sonar and traveling to various parts of the lake or pond, constantly making mental notes of what is found.

seasonality - fish locate in different areas depending on the season and avoid the same areas for the same reason.No guess work when it comes to choosing the right lures, used the right way - trolling generally being least productive. The areas those lures are cast are as important as the lures chosen which goes back to - knowing thy water especially when a water is a mile or more in any direction.

Having confidence in any lure simply means fish were caught on it and nothing more; losing confidence in a lure is just as uninformative. If a lure statistically proves itself - even during only one outing - the lure is now a classic in one's tackle box meaning the odds are very high it can and will catch fish when taking into consideration various fish locations.

Lure color is the least significant factor when choosing lures and I've proven many times that clear soft plastic does as well as opaque colors of any brightness. Color brightness along with flash is something I consider importanct when I want the lure to stand out and to emphasize a lures action as a whole or just the tail.

The whole point of using lures is discovering what each is capable of when it is used in one or different ways and in different situations. Statistics speak loudest when assessing the value of a lure. In fact, results over time do not and can not disprove the value of a lure that has proven itself year after year by consistently catching fish and in different waters no less.

As to what fish are supposedly feeding on at the time, lure choices never need take that into consideration. Higher activity equates to more sensitivity to moving objects, whether alive or appearing so - even regarding the unnatural way lures are prone to moving.
 
Last edited:
I coined a word this year: strike-triggers.
Good Lures have them as do live bait - though more biological in nature. Fish sense the difference between lures and a live worm or minnow. The lure must have the right action and be within a size range, where action-speaks-louder-than-words.

Examples:
  • The Chatterbait has an extreme side-to-side action that transmits vibrations to a skirt or a plastic worm. Bass attack it even in 2'.
  • The first lure I caught a smallie on was a bright yellow, Mr Twister gub. The flapping tail and bright color were fish-strike triggers
  • The blade of a spinnerbait imparts flutter to the skirt along with bright flashes - both strike-triggers
  • A crankbait's wobble causes the hooks to clack; better yet when rattles are inside. Sound and then sight triggers
  • A floating Rapala produces ripples when twitched forcing fish to strike because fish are by nature - bullies.
  • A 5" wacky rigged Senko slowly sinks but with tips and body quivering all the way down. (It's made Gary Yamamoto a bunch of money.
  • These are examples of strike-triggers that set each lure apart that fish with their supersensitive senses detect. Fish must be overly sensitive to survive.
 

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top