After a bit of thought I don’t agree with some of the position he’s taking on this subject. Not to throw the baby out with the bath water as he does make some interesting points, however I think there is more to this than meets the eye, or at least his eye.
He begins by using an example of how are you ever going to bring in a 10 pound Redfish with 3 pounds of drag? In a perfect world that’s an easy question. A 10 pound Redfish in the water doesn't have any weight so you could reel it right in no problem. Additionally, in a perfect world, using his testing methods, tying incremental 1 pound weights to the line, and using 3 pounds of drag, once you add anything over 3 pounds you could reel until the cows came home and you would not gain an inch of line.
But fish fight, they get caught in currents, and at times their bodies can catch water much the way a sail catches wind. All these things and more can present resistance, and this is when drag becomes your friend. A fish can exert more pounds of pressure fighting than its out of water body weight. As most of us know this can be particularly true when the fish realizes something is not kosher with what it is trying to consume. At the same time they are making this initial run you are trying to set the hook. Drag is your friend here too.
Now this is not to say for inshore fishing for the species he described we need anywhere near 20 pounds of drag, but I don’t agree with 2-3 pounds of drag either. I don’t scale set my drag for inshore fishing reels, only my offshore. I use what I guessing most do, and that’s by feel. Experience is key to this feel approach. It has seldomly let me down. Additionally, proper handling of the rod will help avoid the bend he was showing in the rod from dead weight. People don’t fish holding the rod at 90 degrees to the water like he was doing in his test.
In closing, fishing is not as clinical as he makes it out to be. As I have been known on occasion to yell at a crew member when fighting a fish…….. BREAK HIS F’ING JAW!!!