Mass Shootings.

My bad. I should have made it another paragraph. I never said an AR was full auto. You just inferred it because it was one paragraph. So that is my bad. With a bump stock it could perform like a full auto.
Seriously? Protection from a mob?!?! Wow now you are getting desperate with your analogies. So how many mobs have there been since Ferguson that you would need to protect yourself from?

You may not have intended that, but it happens all the time with the news media and the antis. It's certainly intentional on their part.

Mobs, seriously? There's been plenty of riots, protests gotten out of hand etc. Or do you think just because one hasn't happened recently in your neighborhood that they'll never happen again? You're the one who sounds desperate, trying to deny reality.
 
So when they made the speed limit to 55. Everyone that used to drive over that were now illegal. I dont hear them screaming. It also saved lives. When they made it mandatory to wear seatbelts there were people who refused to wear them. Before marijuana was illegal people did it. Now those that do it are criminals when they were not before. I can keep going on and on. What is so hard to understand about there being no real reason to own one other than bragging to friends or taking to the range?

How are laws "supposed " to be written in your opinion?

I've enumerated reasons that you just dismiss because you don't like them. My question to you and your other commie buddy is what is your obsession with AR-15s? What's so special about them?

As far as laws, they are supposed to be thought out well enough to accomplish their purpose without placing an undue burden on the population. I've already explained how the SAFE law was utterly ineffective (hospital shooting I mentioned earlier) yet instantly criminalizes thousands upon thousands of people who owned something perfectly harmless and would have continued to do so forever. BTW, I disagree with seat-belt laws and the criminalization of marijuana too. It's none of the government's G. D. business. And the 55 MPH speed limit did nothing to save lives. It was intended to save gas, and it didn't do that very well either. Another piece of feel-good cr@p.
 
Times Square last night, a motorcycle was backfiring and everyone, I mean everyone thought it was gunshots, Panic... cellie...
 
6 pages in and other than some responses that we need to arm a militia and be able to defend ourselves against those annoying mobs of black folks I have not seen a single response that admits there is some kind of a problem and a viable solution or suggestion on how to solve the problem
 
6 pages in and other than some responses that we need to arm a militia and be able to defend ourselves against those annoying mobs of black folks I have not seen a single response that admits there is some kind of a problem and a viable solution or suggestion on how to solve the problem

How do you lefty's always manage to call racism on everything?

BTW, do you think that any gun owner or the NRA thinks this kind of thing isn't a problem? Do you think it serves the cause when some kook shoots some place up? It certainly serves the left's cause. Hmmmm,... maybe that's why THEY don't have any real solutions.

Speaking of which, I haven't heard you offer a viable solution either. And if you say ban AR-15s I can promise you that's not a viable solution. You can never get rid of them all and the kooks will just turn to something else.

Most of us support mental health reporting in the NICS system, but it has to follow due process which Obama's rule did not. You cannot deprive someone of their civil rights arbitrarily.

In the long run though, I think it's going to be more like the way we handle terrorism. A lot of police work, monitoring social media and "If you see something, say something" kind of alerts to law enforcement. The other thing we're going to have to acknowledge is that there will never be perfection. These kinds of things will happen no matter what we do i.e. the list of incidents I posted earlier where massacres happen in countries with strict gun control.
 
How do you lefty's always manage to call racism on everything?

BTW, do you think that any gun owner or the NRA thinks this kind of thing isn't a problem? Do you think it serves the cause when some kook shoots some place up? It certainly serves the left's cause. Hmmmm,... maybe that's why THEY don't have any real solutions.

Speaking of which, I haven't heard you offer a viable solution either. And if you say ban AR-15s I can promise you that's not a viable solution. You can never get rid of them all and the kooks will just turn to something else.

Most of us support mental health reporting in the NICS system, but it has to follow due process which Obama's rule did not. You cannot deprive someone of their civil rights arbitrarily.

In the long run though, I think it's going to be more like the way we handle terrorism. A lot of police work, monitoring social media and "If you see something, say something" kind of alerts to law enforcement. The other thing we're going to have to acknowledge is that there will never be perfection. These kinds of things will happen no matter what we do i.e. the list of incidents I posted earlier where massacres happen in countries with strict gun control.
First of all, I'm not gonna fall into the trap of going back and forth with you cuz no matter what I say you say the exact opposite and vice versa

Just because I don't agree with you doesn't make me a lefty so don't go there
I won't label you, don't label me. You got no idea what I am except different than you

Regarding racism, you openly and clearly wrote AR's are needed to feel protected from the riots and mobs in LA after Rodney King and in Ferguson. In both those instances, those were people of color. If you are gonna post something so blatant, have the beans to own it.
 
Gabby gifford’s Hubby mark the astronaut (kelly?) has a 3 prong approach that i agree with. 1. Universal background checks for EVERY sale. 2. “Red Flag” but only from only specific sources. 3. Anyone convicted of domestic abuse? Automatic denial.
 
Gabby gifford’s Hubby mark the astronaut (kelly?) has a 3 prong approach that i agree with. 1. Universal background checks for EVERY sale. 2. “Red Flag” but only from only specific sources. 3. Anyone convicted of domestic abuse? Automatic denial.
I think that is a reasonable idea and thanks for bringing that up.
Early on I said both sides need to get past the bickering, recognize that something needs to be done, and fix it.
Then I fell into the trap and started bickering.

I honestly believe there is a common sense approach that would satisfy both sides
 
You can pass all the laws you want, there are quite a few on the books already. The problem is enforcement.

NJ recently banned more than 10 round capacity magazines. There are an estimated 1 million gun owners there, not one person has turned in a now illegal magazine. Cops now say they would charge this felony in context with other crimes if they were found to possess one.

The Sutherland Springs church shooter was dishonorably discharged from the Air Force and therefore banned from owning guns - the Air force failed six times to report his domestic abuse to the authorities. He should have not been allowed to purchase the gun he used in his massacre, the law was in place.

So as we argue for common sense approaches, the reality is that there will always be cracks to slip through and the next tragedy will occur. The end game is confiscation of all guns, which isn't going to happen. So round and round we go.
 
First of all, I'm not gonna fall into the trap of going back and forth with you cuz no matter what I say you say the exact opposite and vice versa

Just because I don't agree with you doesn't make me a lefty so don't go there
I won't label you, don't label me. You got no idea what I am except different than you

Regarding racism, you openly and clearly wrote AR's are needed to feel protected from the riots and mobs in LA after Rodney King and in Ferguson. In both those instances, those were people of color. If you are gonna post something so blatant, have the beans to own it.

Okay we'll stop the labeling business. But since we're talking about labels let's address this.

I mentioned two incidents that were major news stories where people needed significant firepower to protect their lives and property. Plenty of violence occurs from many things like protests at political rallys. Antifa is a bunch of spoiled white kids and they start plenty of trouble. But I find it really interesting that your first focus was on race. I don't need to own anything, maybe you do.

I did mention a couple of things that could be addressed since you said nobody had. But I guess that's just exact opposite back and forth? You're a critic of the conversation, but you're not contributing anything to the conversation.
 
as for labels.....it is the ultra right wingers on here that are one minded and should be labeled and most likely NEVER voted democrat and never will.......meanwhile i have voted for Reagan....gh bush...and even GW Bush twice.....i never even argued politics until I saw the BS on NE being spewed by closed minded people....so I enjoyed exposing their nonsense and getting a rise outta them......politics should be banned on sporting sites...it's divisive.....but it isn't so we have fun.......
 
sounds good

tumblr_m7kr7sLnHx1rum9y6o1_400.gif
 
as for labels.....it is the ultra right wingers on here that are one minded and should be labeled and most likely NEVER voted democrat and never will.......meanwhile i have voted for Reagan....gh bush...and even GW Bush twice.....i never even argued politics until I saw the BS on NE being spewed by closed minded people....so I enjoyed exposing their nonsense and getting a rise outta them......politics should be banned on sporting sites...it's divisive.....but it isn't so we have fun.......

I have voted for Democrats when their ideals are similar to mine. It doesn't happen often, but it has happened.

As far as the constant tossing of the racist label by some here, my search for examples of large scale riots had me looking for the L.A. riots particularly because of the store owners using guns to protect their property from the mobs. Ferguson came up in that search also so I included it because it was well known and matched the scenario. So I guess according to some people here Google is racist. What I find interesting is that I never considered race, only circumstances. It was the leftists here who focused on people's skin color.

While we're talking about labels, what would be a PC term? I need something to call the opposition to avoid confusion. How about "You people"? ;)
 

Members online

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

  • The Accurate Valiant 2
    🎣 The Accurate Valiant 2: A Deep Dive into the Reel That's Redefining East Coast Fishing As an...
    • Susie Angler
    • Updated:
    • 5 min read
  • A Long Island Sound Blackfish Story
    The Old School Way: A Long Island Sound Blackfish Story For the party boat angler looking to...
    • george
    • Updated:
    • 5 min read
  • New York State Freshwater Fishing Records
    New York State Freshwater Fishing Records (Per DEC) Introduction These are the current official...
    • george
    • Updated:
    • 4 min read
  • Saltwater Fishing Records
    New York State Marine / Saltwater Fishing Records (Per DEC) Introduction These are the official...
    • george
    • Updated:
    • 3 min read
  • New York's Marine Recreational Angler Records
    New York's Marine Recreational Angler Records: Your Gateway to Fishing Glory NYAngler.com...
    • Susie Angler
    • Updated:
    • 5 min read
Back
Top