the "Headline That Caught My Attention or the WTF" thread

It's civil forfeiture without a trial, scary stuff indeed.
One of the reasons why the 2nd amendment is so important.
From a lawyer colleague:

Most courts have written into the operational rules a trial-avoidance rule that allows for "Summary Judgment" or "Summary Disposition" of cases where the Judge becomes convinced that there is no dispute of facts. The job of a jury is to determine the facts. If the facts are crystal-clear and not capable of being disputed, the jury isn't needed. These rules are written with language making it clear that the party opposing summary judgment is to be given the benefit of the doubt as to what is or in not still in dispute in the way of facts. The Federal Court Rules grant the trial Judge a bit more discretion than most State court rules on the issue of whether or not there remains in a case a legitimate dispute over relevant fact.

How the Judge in the case might have arrived at the conclusion that there were no disputed facts escapes me, other than assuming that Judge is afflicted with ABC. The willingness of financial institutions to give XYZ business loans based upon the valuation of the collateral pledged by XYZ, by itself, in my mind at least, create a dispute of fact as to the real estate valuations provided in loan applications."
 
From a lawyer colleague:

Most courts have written into the operational rules a trial-avoidance rule that allows for "Summary Judgment" or "Summary Disposition" of cases where the Judge becomes convinced that there is no dispute of facts. The job of a jury is to determine the facts. If the facts are crystal-clear and not capable of being disputed, the jury isn't needed. These rules are written with language making it clear that the party opposing summary judgment is to be given the benefit of the doubt as to what is or in not still in dispute in the way of facts. The Federal Court Rules grant the trial Judge a bit more discretion than most State court rules on the issue of whether or not there remains in a case a legitimate dispute over relevant fact.

How the Judge in the case might have arrived at the conclusion that there were no disputed facts escapes me, other than assuming that Judge is afflicted with ABC. The willingness of financial institutions to give XYZ business loans based upon the valuation of the collateral pledged by XYZ, by itself, in my mind at least, create a dispute of fact as to the real estate valuations provided in loan applications."
So this was just going through the motions to get to a predetermined verdict? That's how it appears to me.
 
most certainly. since facts are disputed, it goes (like 99%) to trial. should have of course but this is the commies were talking about.
 
Good all Abert was correct...

Nothing’s the Matter With Antimatter, New Experiment Confirms

Consider it good news, physicists say: “The opposite result would have had big implications.”

Antimatter just lost a little more pizazz.

Physicists know that for every fundamental particle in nature there is an antiparticle — an evil twin of identical mass but endowed with equal and opposite characteristics like charge and spin. When these twins meet, they obliterate each other, releasing a flash of energy on contact.

In science fiction, antiparticles provide the power for warp drives. Some physicists have speculated that antiparticles are being repelled by gravity or even traveling backward in time.

A new experiment at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research, brings some of that speculation back down to Earth. In a gravitational field, it turns out, antiparticles fall just like the rest of us. “The bottom line is that there’s no free lunch, and we’re not going to be able to levitate using antimatter,” said Joel Fajans of the University of California, Berkeley.

Dr. Fajans was part of an international team known as ALPHA, the Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus collaboration, which is based at CERN and led by Jeffrey Hangst, a particle physicist at Aarhus University in Denmark. Dr. Fajans and his colleagues assembled about 100 anti-atoms of hydrogen and suspended them in a magnetic field. When the field was slowly ramped down, the anti-hydrogen atoms drifted down like maple leaves in October and at the same rate of downward acceleration, or g force, as regular atoms: about 32 feet per second per second. They published their result on Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Few physicists were surprised by the result. According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, all forms of matter and energy respond equally to gravity.

“If you walk down the halls of this department and ask the physicists, they would all say that this result is not the least bit surprising,” Jonathan Wurtele, a physicist at the University of California, Berkeley, said in an announcement issued by the university. It was he who first suggested the experiment to Dr. Fajans a decade ago. “That’s the reality,” Dr. Wurtele said.

“But most of them will also say that the experiment had to be done because you never can be sure,” he added. “The opposite result would have had big implications.”
 
The theft also included at least 18 state-run liquor stores, which were broken into and cleaned out. The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board announced on Wednesday it would be closing all 48 of its Philadelphia retail locations. It also said it would be closing its one store in suburban Cheltenham.
 

Humans Got Too Close to the Sea Lions. Now They’re Closing the Beach.

The San Diego City Council unanimously voted to close a 150-yard stretch of coastline known as Point La Jolla after selfie-taking visitors got too close to the pinnipeds.

A crowd surrounds a lone sea lion on a beach a few feet from the water.

La Jolla, Calif., has long been home to sea lions and a popular tourist destination.Credit...Mike Blake/Reuters

A popular San Diego beach has long been the domain of sea lions, which for years tolerated their human onlookers — some more respectful than others.

But tensions escalated this summer, when two large males charged ashore, sending a crowd of beachgoers scrambling for their clothes and stumbling over rocks to escape. A lifeguard urged people to give the animals space. “They have bit people,” he warned, “and they are protected animals.”

Last week, the city made it official: Point La Jolla is not for the people.

The resolution, passed unanimously by the San Diego City Council, follows months of debate regarding the beloved beach just north of La Jolla Cove; the rocky stretch is popular with spear fishermen and body surfers and is home to a rookery of 100 to 200 sea lions. But in recent years, social media posts bragging about close encounters with the animals have drawn throngs of tourists, who have increasingly encroached on the animals’ space.

Conservationists cite visitors who get too close to the sea lions to take selfies, to touch and pet them or even to climb on top of the larger ones. Other visitors, conservationists say, have tried to handle week-old pups, while their mothers are out at sea gathering fish. Male sea lions, which can weigh up to 1,000 pounds, often become particularly aggressive during mating season in the summer, which is also the busiest period for tourists.

“Several pups drowned from being harassed into the water before they were capable of handling the turbulence of the waves,” said Kirsten Donald, a biologist with the Pacific Marine Mammal Center, which was involved in promoting the closure. When it comes to nature, she added, “people have really lost their common sense.”

Last year, officials decided to close the area — a roughly 150-yard stretch from Point La Jolla to Boomer Beach — during pupping season, which runs from May to October. But the amendment extends the closure year-round. Visitors will have to watch the sea lions from behind a barrier, and an access point will remain open for those wanting to enter the water for “ocean swimming activities only,” according to documents posted by the City Council.

In public comments, many locals supported the closure, citing the dangers of harassing the animals, as well as the hazards of slippery rocks. One woman noted that a cellphone with a good zoom camera could do just about as good a job as getting up close to the mammals. But other locals said they strongly opposed the measure; one claimed that there were too many pinnipeds. Another described the closure as a “hostile takeover of a public beach.”

Japhet Perez Estrada, a 28-year-old local resident who filmed the widely shared July incident, said that while the harassment of the sea lions upset him, he felt that closing Point La Jolla was “too heavy handed.” He recalled visiting the beach as a child and believed that future generations should enjoy the same experience. “It’s punishing the masses for honestly the actions of a very small minority,” he said. “It’s not fair to the rest of us.”

Mr. Perez Estrada said he had filmed the two sea lions bounding ashore at La Jolla Cove, which is not being closed off, after a two-mile open water swim (he usually carries his phone for safety in a waterproof case). He said he was struck by the sheer number of people crowding the beach and how close they were to the sea lions. “Unfortunately,” he added, “this wasn’t my first time seeing something like this.”

Mr. Perez Estrada recalled when he got into an altercation with a man he saw tossing orange peels at a group of sea lions in an effort to chase them from the patch of sand where he had hoped to plant his chairs. “His arguments were, ‘Humans are the bosses, animals should listen to us,’” Mr. Perez Estrada said. “Just nonsense.”

But, he added, “as locals we know better, we grew up around the sea lions — we know to respect their space.”
 
The theft also included at least 18 state-run liquor stores, which were broken into and cleaned out. The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board announced on Wednesday it would be closing all 48 of its Philadelphia retail locations. It also said it would be closing its one store in suburban Cheltenham.
Oh man, they are taking the booze from the ghetto. Now they will all be on “tranq”.
 

Experts on San Francisco, drugs and crime responded to San Francisco Mayor London Breed's Tuesday proposal to require residents who wish to receive welfare services to comply with mandatory drug testing and treatment programs.

Breed's announcement comes amid growing pressure to hold back the city’s homeless and fentanyl crises and as challengers to Breed as mayor continue to throw their name in for office in 2024.

"She's in trouble," former San Francisco councilman and business owner Tony Hall told FOX News Digital. "She's found her administration is under increasing fire from the voters in San Francisco. She has to do something about the drug situation in San Francisco. So this is her latest salvo, trying to sound like a conservative in that she's really doing something. She does this periodically whenever she's in trouble. There's no follow through."
 

Several Cooper Union students told The New York Post this week it’s "crazy" that their university hired a professor who once threatened to "chop" a reporter with her machete.

"I don’t think such a person should be here," said one student when asked about professor Shellyne Rodriguez beginning her new job at the school, located in New York City's East Village.

Upon hearing about the hire’s past, another student exclaimed, "Oh s---! That’s scary. I don’t think it’s ok. When you are a student you’d want to feel safe. I would not feel safe with that person being my professor."
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Members online

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top