the "Headline That Caught My Attention or the WTF" thread

Yikes. If I spell China with a capital C does that get to stay ? I wouldn't want to be politically incorrect ya know, lol. Why is it that the Ebola River and the Marburg (village) malady and the incorrectly appropriated Spanish flu get to be so identified ?

I wonder if we'll be allowed to call it the C**na virus if we confirm it escaped from their lab.

 
That large country east of Mongolia that starts with a 'c' paid off the WHO and too much time has passed to confirm the commies were responsible. I have not believed for one second that it "escaped" or was an accident. Sheeple need to read Sun Tsu. I spent way too much time conducting national security background investigations to trust anything regarding either country on either side of Mongolia.
 
For once, an editorial from the Portland Paper that makes sense...

Our View: Thrifty Mainers should have the ‘right to repair’​

pressherald.com/2021/07/22/our-view-thrifty-mainers-should-have-the-right-to-repair-2/

By The Editorial Board July 22, 2021
Consumer_Confidence_89295.jpg

The thrifty, crafty New Englander is not just a stereotype — research points to a longstanding culture of repair and reuse in Maine that abhors waste, either in material or money.

But actions by manufacturers have made it harder, and in some cases impossible, for anyone but themselves to fix or maintain many consumer products, limiting consumer choice and raising costs.

The Federal Trade Commission voted on Wednesday to take action against these anti-competitive practices, which strike right at the heart of small business and entrepreneurship. In doing so, the agency is asserting that we all have — to use a phrase from activists — the “right to repair.”

That right never used to be in question. There was a time when the lives of the things we bought could be extended with a few spare parts and some know-how.

But more and more, companies are keeping a tight hold on both those things, forcing consumers to either use the manufacturer’s own repair service, or buy a new product outright. They are purposely designing products to complicate or prevent repair, keeping parts and repair information to themselves, or using software locks to push out the competition.

“Repairs today require specialized tools, difficult-to-obtain parts, and access to proprietary diagnostic software,” an FTC report said in May.

As a result, the small businesses that do third-party repair are put at a disadvantage, stunting a local industry full of innovators who offer affordable services. And when a product breaks, consumers have few places to go but back to the manufacturer.

So when someone breaks their smartphone — and it’s their only way to access the internet — there’s probably no shop down the street that can get it back to them quickly and cheaply.

Or when schools need laptops for students, they can find it difficult to rebuild old computers themselves, and are forced to buy new ones — if they can find them with the broken supply chains of the COVID era.

The FTC also heard from farmers with broken-down tractors, hospitals with worn-down ventilators, and members of the military with malfunctioning equipment. All of them wanted to do the repairs themselves but were stymied by lack of help from manufacturers.

Opposition to the right to repair, besides from manufacturers looking to preserve this revenue stream at the expense of consumers, comes from concern over safety should the wrong person work on an item. There are certainly safety considerations in some industries, but the FTC report found those worries in general overblown.

The harm to consumers by repair restrictions is just too high to ignore. Americans everywhere rely on these products to get through the day. When one breaks down, they should have more than just one costly option to get it back up and running.

And, besides, in a world full of waste, we should be reusing the things we buy, not tossing them into a landfill every time a problem arises.

We’re sure any thrifty Mainer will agree.
 
The headline could read, "LI-based Aircraft Dumbs Trash on Maine Golf Course" ;)

Aircraft landing gear breaks off, lands on Gorham golf course​

pressherald.com/2021/07/21/aircraft-landing-gear-breaks-off-lands-on-gorham-golf-course/

By Dennis Hoey July 22, 2021
220772534_4069539626429032_7835810850898696881_n.jpg

A large piece of landing gear from an airplane broke off and plummeted to earth Tuesday night, landing on the seventh fairway at Gorham Country Club.

Sgt. Ted Hatch of the Gorham Police Department, who recovered the landing gear for the Federal Aviation Administration to inspect, said no injuries were reported.

Hatch said the twin-engined Piper Navajo was preparing to land at the Portland International Jetport, but its pilot decided to fly back to New York after he was informed that the airplane’s landing gear was no longer attached.

The Gorham Police Department received a phone call around 6 p.m. from the golf course informing them that a piece of landing gear was on the course. Hatch said he went to the course and recovered the wheel around 7:45 p.m. Hatch posted photos of the landing gear on the department’s Facebook page. He estimated that the landing gear weighed around 100 pounds.

As for the pilot, Hatch said the FAA told him that the plane landed safely at the MacArthur Airport in New York. Hatch said the pilot turned around in an effort to burn off all his fuel before conducting a crash landing. The pilot was not injured.

Hatch said he was grateful that no one was injured from the falling debris.

“Just when you thought you have seen everything, things really do fall from the sky,” Hatch wrote on his Facebook post. “There were 2 miracles in this event. Number one, nobody was struck by this falling object when it fell on the 7th fairway. Number 2, the plane was able to do a belly landing and landed safely in Islip, New York.”
 
  • Share on Twitter
  • Open more share options

Breadcrumb Trail Links​

  1. PMN Business

No Crabs, No Scallops: Seafood Is Vanishing From Menus in U.S.​

Author of the article:
Bloomberg News

Bloomberg News
Adam Jackson and Kate Krader
Publishing date:
Jul 27, 2021 • 2 hours ago • 4 minute read

No Crabs, No Scallops: Seafood Is Vanishing From Menus in U.S.
 

I was at Flo's in June for some whole belly clams, $24.95 market price for a small order. I was in the mood so I paid up.
While they were really good I wouldn't pay that much again, I guess they noticed they couldn't justify raising the price any more.
 
 
I was at Flo's in June for some whole belly clams, $24.95 market price for a small order. I was in the mood so I paid up.
While they were really good I wouldn't pay that much again, I guess they noticed they couldn't justify raising the price any more.
Many places up here, the Capitol of Soft Shell Clamming, have changed there menu prices for fried clams to the dreaded "MKT Price", just like lobstah...
 
Sad, but a definite sign of the times...

Acadia, other national parks exploring options after being ‘loved to death’​

pressherald.com/2021/07/28/acadia-other-national-parks-exploring-options-after-being-loved-to-death/

By Kevin Miller July 28, 2021

Atop Cadillac Mountain, it wasn’t unusual to have 500 cars competing for the 150 spots available to visitors hoping to catch the sweeping views from Acadia National Park’s highest point.

Out west, Arches National Park in Utah regularly has to close its gates to additional visitors after reaching capacity. And at Zion National Park – another iconic Utah location that was the third-busiest national park last year – visitors faced a two-hour wait to catch a shuttle bus and a four-hour wait to even start hiking one popular trail over Memorial Day weekend.

“We can accidentally love our parks to death,” Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, said Wednesday while opening a Senate subcommittee hearing on overcrowding at some national parks. While it is great to see so many Americans visiting these protected places, King said, crowds are straining resources and “souring what should be a once-in-a-lifetime vacation.”

“Watching the sunrise from the top of Cadillac Mountain is a wonderful experience,” said King, the subcommittee chairman. “Staring at the taillights of the car in front of you as you are trying to get up the mountain and find a parking place? Not so much.”

Visitation to the country’s most popular national parks, including Acadia, has been rising steadily for several years. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the situation in many locations as cooped-up Americans – prohibited from traveling overseas and yearning for some outside time away from home – have flooded into parks for vacation.

Wednesday’s meeting of the National Parks Subcommittee of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee was aimed at discussing different steps that are being taken across the country to address the situation.

Rocky Mountain National Park, for instance, now requires a “timed-entry reservation” or a reservation with a service provider in order to visit any part of the 415-square mile park.

At Acadia, park managers went with a more scaled-back approach starting this year by requiring timed-entry reservations to drive up Cadillac Mountain between sunrise and sunset. While the park has shelved plans for a timed-entry system at Sand Beach and the busy stretch of Park Loop Road, officials are still considering it to address severe congestion at Jordan Pond and Bass Harbor Head Light.


Park visitors crowd the summit of Cadillac Mountain, one of the most popular spots in Acadia National Park, this month. Ben McCanna/Staff Photographer

PRAISE FOR TIMED ENTRY
Acadia Superintendent Kevin Schneider told subcommittee members via Zoom from Bar Harbor that he was “very pleased” with the first month and a half of the reservation system for Cadillac. In addition to the largely positive reviews on sites such as Tripadvisor, Schneider recalled talking to a man who had been on the summit twice in a week for sunrise – once before reservations were needed and then after.

“And he said this is so much better with the reservation system,” Schneider said. “Visitors understand that there are only 150 parking spaces on Cadillac Mountain and we want everybody to have a really high-quality experience. Not everybody can be up there at the same time with their cars.”

Between May 26, the first day, and July 13, Acadia sold 77 percent of the 83,900 vehicle reservations that were made available through the National Park Service’s online portal at recreation.gov for $6 each. All 7,100 of the sunrise reservations sold and 75 percent of 76,800 daytime reservations available to vehicles sold during that period, according to figures supplied to the Portland Press Herald on Wednesday.

“The rollout has been very successful on Cadillac Mountain and has improved the visitor experience by leaps and bounds,” Stephanie Clement, conservation director at the nonprofit Friends of Acadia, said in an interview.

Clement said the organization’s group of roving public educators/researchers, called “summit stewards,” who interact with the public, report that the situation is much improved atop Cadillac this year in terms of efficiency and safety. The congestion led to tense and, at times, unsafe conditions – particularly in the pre-dawn darkness – as cars jockeyed for a spot or parked in unauthorized areas along the roadways.
“I think that visitors are a whole lot happier not having to drive around in circles looking for parking spaces and getting frustrated, parking illegally on the grass,” Clement said.


Acadia National Park allows parking in the right lane in some the more popular spots along the Loop Road, like this spot near Sand Beach, shown this month. The park has plans, however, to reduce parking at some locations. Ben McCanna/Staff Photographer

Acadia has logged nearly 1.2 million visitors this year through June – a 33 percent increase over the pre-pandemic figures for 2019. For all of 2019, Acadia had roughly 3.4 million visits, which was just shy of the record-setting 3.5 million visits the year before.

PARKS VISITATION INCREASING
Many of the park service’s most popular locations are seeing similar trends. Between 2013 and 2019, visitation was up 20 percent across the national parks system, and many parks – including Glacier and Yellowstone – have seen visitation double since 1980.

“These visitors are evidence of the success of the federal government protecting locations that are both valued by the public and deserving of national park designation,” Kristen Brengel, senior vice president for government affairs at the National Parks Conservation Association, said during the hearing. “However, the growth in visitation is also posing one of the greatest challenges NPS has ever faced.”

Although there are more than 400 “units” within the National Park Service system, just 23 parks and monuments account for roughly half of the more than 300 million visits logged annually (with the exception of 2020) in recent years. And about a dozen of those 23 face “significant congestion conditions,” said Michael Reynolds, director of the National Park Service region that includes most of the western parks.

Reynolds said the park service is exploring a host of options tailored to each location, in consultation and collaboration with local communities and partners. Timed-entry reservation systems have been implemented in Acadia, Yosemite, Glacier and Rocky Mountain national parks – some still on a pilot basis – while many other places are expanding shuttle services or partnering with outside groups on other transportation options.

The agency also has a mobile phone app and launched a “Plan Like a Park Ranger” campaign to encourage visitors to plan in advance, make reservations whenever possible and have backup plans in place (perhaps at another nearby park) if their first choice activity isn’t feasible.

Of course, changes don’t always go as smoothly as planned.

CHANGES IRK SOME PARK VISITORS
Kevin Gartland, executive director of the Whitefish (Montana) Chamber of Commerce, said the reservation system at Glacier National Park was rolled out too late and with insufficient marketing. While he credited the National Park Service for working with businesses and keeping them abreast of the coming changes, Gartland said many people make their arrangements to visit Glacier a year or two in advance.

As a result, Gartland said many business owners are spending their summer scrambling to help irate guests get into the park.

“They’ve traveled thousands of miles, they’ve made tens of thousands of dollars (in arrangements) on hotels, airfare and rental car reservations only to see their vacation ‘ruined’ because they couldn’t get that $2 ticket to see Glacier National Park,” Gartland said.

Yet, Gartland said the timed-entry reservation is reducing crowds at popular spots within the park. So while the timing and marketing of the system could have been better, Gartland said local businesses also wouldn’t want to go back to 2018 and 2019 when overcrowding forced the park to close the gates to additional visitors.

King and ranking member Sen. Steve Daines, R-Montana, encouraged Reynolds to work with technology partners to allow visitors to use mobile apps to track congestion in parks and learn about lesser-known alternative sites to visit in the area.

“You know, this is a good thing,” Daines said. “While there are challenges that we need to look at because of increased visitation, we also need to ensure we are not closing off our parks to the world and that we continue to build visitation, the jobs and the economic benefits that they provide.”

King said understaffing within the park service also is an issue and that he hopes his colleagues will consider the intense interest that Americans are exhibiting in visiting parks when considering proposals for new areas to preserve. In an interview afterward, King said he hoped the hearing will lead to more conversation about options for addressing overcrowding.

“There are lots of experiments going on around the country, including at Acadia … and it is important for us to know how those are working,” King said.
 
Sponge Bob's ancestors are almost 1 Billion Years Old!!!

Oldest fossils of animals may be in Canada, study says​

pressherald.com/2021/07/28/oldest-fossils-of-animals-may-be-in-canada-study-says/

By CHRISTINA LARSON July 28, 2021
Earliest Animal Fossil
A field location in the Northwest Territories, Canada, where geologist Elizabeth Turner may have found the earliest fossil record of animal life on Earth in the area shown, according to a report published Wednesday in the journal Nature. Courtesy of Elizabeth Turner/Laurentian University via AP

WASHINGTON — A Canadian geologist may have found the earliest fossil record of animal life on Earth, according to a report published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Around a billion years ago, a region of northwest Canada now defined by steep mountains was a prehistoric marine environment where the remains of ancient sponges may be preserved in mineral sediment, the paper says.

Geologist Elizabeth Turner discovered the rocks in a remote region of the Northwest Territories accessible only by helicopter, where she has been excavating since the 1980s. Thin sections of rock contain three-dimensional structures that resemble modern sponge skeletons.

“I believe these are ancient sponges – only this type of organism has this type of network of organic filaments,” said Joachim Reitner, a geobiologist and expert in sponges at Germany’s University of Göttingen, who was not involved in the research.

The dating of adjacent rock layers indicates the samples are about 890 million years old, which would make them about 350 million years older than the oldest undisputed sponge fossils previously found.

“What’s most stunning is the timing,” said Paco Cardenas, an expert on sponges at Sweden’s Uppsala University, who was not involved in the research. “To have discovered sponge fossils from close to 900 million years ago will greatly improve our understanding of early animal evolution.”

Many scientists believe the first animal groups included soft sponges or sponge-like creatures that lack muscles and nerves but have other features of simple animals, including cells with differentiated functions and sperm.

To be sure, there’s very little scientific consensus or certainty about anything dating back a billion years ago, so other researchers will likely continue to vet and debate Turner’s findings.

“I think she’s got a pretty strong case. I think this is very worthy of publishing – it puts the evidence out there for other people to consider,” said David Bottjer, a paleobiologist at University of Southern California, who was not involved in the research.

Scientists believe life on Earth emerged around 3.7 billion years ago. The earliest animals appeared much later, but exactly when is still debated.

Until now, the oldest undisputed fossil sponges date to around 540 million years ago, an era called the Cambrian period.

But scientists using a line of reasoning called the molecular clock – where they analyze the rate of genetic mutations to backdate when two species likely diverged – say that available evidence points to sponges emerging much earlier, around a billion years ago.

Yet no supporting physical evidence has yet been found until now.

“This would be the first time that a sponge fossil has been found from before the Cambrian, and not only before, but way before – that’s what’s most exciting,” said Uppsala University’s Cardenas, adding that the research seems to confirm the molecular clock estimates.

Fossil evidence is scant before the Cambrian period, when animals first developed hard skeletons, exoskeletons and shells, which are more likely to be preserved.

“Those kinds of fossils belong to more complicated animals – obviously there has to be a back history” of simpler animals like sponges emerging first, said the paper’s author, Turner, who is based at Laurentian University in Ontario.

The dating of 890 million years ago is significant because, if the sponge’s identification is confirmed, it shows that the first animals evolved before a time when oxygen in the atmosphere and ocean reached a level scientists once thought was necessary for animal life. Yet recent research shows that some sponges can survive with very little oxygen.

“Everything on Earth has an ancestor. It’s always been predicted that the first evidence of animal life would be small and cryptic, a very subtle clue,” said Roger Summons, an MIT geobiologist who was not involved in the research.
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Members online

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top