Avenger
Well-Known Angler
if I'm drunk and showing signs of being drunk & showing signs of inebriation in my driving (you know - probable cause?)- fine -...
That's not the same as DWI checkpoints. Try again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if I'm drunk and showing signs of being drunk & showing signs of inebriation in my driving (you know - probable cause?)- fine -...
Driving is a privilege, not a right as it is a legally regulated activity requiring a license, adherence to traffic laws, and passing tests. It is granted by the state and can be suspended, revoked, or restricted if you violate safety regulations. Unlike constitutional rights, it is not guaranteed.SMH, driving is not a privilege in any state and stopping you to produce documents stating you can drive is not a constitutional wrong.
Planned obsolescence, or cheaper materials of components with no easy access for replacement, a true plague of modern life...ya see my left rear window, it’s taped to keep it in up position, parts on order.
( regulator ) stupid plastic gear melts down after 80,000 miles, as it is a very common problem…
6 months earlier, the passenger front went and 6 months before that ( 1 year ago ) drivers side failed…
drivers side was a bitch, 2 men 4 hours… first time attempts…
this go round should be easier…
i may just 2 part epoxy the 4th door… cell…
.
View attachment 111922View attachment 111923View attachment 111924View attachment 111925
I fixed that just for you.Driving is a privilege, not a right as it is a legally regulated activity requiring a license, adherence to traffic laws, and passing tests. It is granted by the state and can be suspended, revoked, or restricted if you violate safety regulations. Unlike constitutional rights, it is not guaranteed.
Well while you are at it correct the other part of your incorrect statement that police can pull you over to check to see if you have a drivers license. They cannot ordinarily do that they need probable cause.I fixed that just for you.
Except for when Quint alludes to the college educated part your response reminds me of a scene for Jaws…….There’s a reason why I wear DILLIGAF on my collar. Care to recite some more?
There’s a reason why I wear DILLIGAF on my collar. Care to recite some more?
Law enforcement cannot just pull you over for no reason. They need probable cause. PERIODI just wish the AI attorney would make up his mind. You need probable cause, you don't need probable cause.![]()
But they can hold a roadside checkpoint for no reason?Law enforcement cannot just pull you over for no reason. They need probable cause. PERIOD
But they can hold a roadside checkpoint for no reason.
difference is they can legally hold a roadside checkpoint f
The courts have established that roadside checkpoints can be preformed. However, they still cannot only pull YOU over. The law requires it be preformed in a non discriminatory manner. An example, in a roadside DWI check the cars pulled over cannot be randomly selected. However, if they pull over every 3rd car., than that is legal.But they can hold a roadside checkpoint for no reason.
The courts have established that roadside checkpoints can be preformed. However, they still cannot only pull YOU over. The law requires it be preformed in a non discriminatory manner. An example, in a roadside DWI check the cars pulled over cannot be randomly selected. However, if they pull over every 3rd car., than that is legal.
You……. “ don’t give a $#it what the courts said”I can see why you're a leftist. You seem to be okay with things that suit your opinion but have trouble making the logical connection that the rules need to apply regardless of how you feel about the subject.
Stopping people without probable cause is a fourth amendment violation no matter what. It's not acceptable under certain circumstances, if it's random, if it's Tuesday, if they're looking for drunks, if they're looking for illegals, then it's okay? Nope.
And before you trot out the AI attorney again, I don't give a $#it what the courts said. Courts have been wrong before, they're wrong now. Civil asset forfeiture is wrong, Roe v Wade was wrong, Dred Scott was wrong. It doesn't depend on feelings and opinions, it depends on the Constitution. Random roadside checkpoints are wrong. Period. Not just if their inconvenient or not random.
Planned obsolescence, or cheaper materials of components with no easy access for replacement, a true plague of modern life...
Because you are lame and want attention.then why would I fucking post it?