The $6 million verdict against Meta and Google in a social media addiction trial could pave the way for a wave of lawsuits, according to a business trial lawyer.
www.foxbusiness.com
Keep a close eye on this case and others. There are thousands of these cases out there.
A
Los Angeles jury on Wednesday found both companies liable for designing addictive platforms for young users, awarding $3 million in compensatory damages and another $3 million in punitive damages.
Monte Mann, a business trial lawyer at Armstrong Teasdale, said appeals are expected, but the larger implications could be far more consequential.
"I think the verdict will immediately be cited in other cases across the country because now plaintiffs have a roadmap of this theory being validated by a jury," Mann told FOX Business.
"The real story here is what comes next," he said. "If this theory holds true across multiple cases, you're no longer talking about millions of dollars, you're talking about hundreds of millions or potentially billions in aggregate liability for
these companies."
Large-scale liability often grows from a single breakthrough case, according to Mann.
A key factor in the case was the plaintiffs’ strategy to focus on product design rather than user-generated content.
Instead of challenging what users post, an area largely protected under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the lawsuit targeted how the platforms are built, according to Mann.
"This is a direct hit on
Big Tech's core defense that [they're] just neutral platforms. The jury didn't buy that," Mann said.
Google told FOX Business it plans to appeal the verdict.
"We disagree with the verdict and plan to appeal," a company spokesperson said. "This case misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site."
Watch, if the plan of attack is in "design" this could open up mores cases of "fake news" and left bias "design". That in itself would be outstanding.