Gee I dunno, I see 2 white guys up there...
If I'm biased, it's because I look at facts and use them to form an opinion.
Fact - This WAS a demonstration, and a peaceful one at that. They did not force their way into the California Capital, the word "California" is important to the context you originally posted, isn't? The wanted to read a statement to the assembly but were barred from entering, so they went out and read it on the steps.
A non-violent protest, nobody, including security personnel, were physically attacked and they exited from the Capitol when requested. And importantly, no legislative session was disrupted.
So your use of this in the same light as 1/6/2021 is ABSOLUTELY WRONG. ZERO arrest warrants vs. Hundreds. Oh, those pesky facts...
Here's a recap of the event in case you care to read:
Armed Black Panthers in the Capitol, 50 years on - Capitol Weekly
But in case you don't, here's an excerpt...
Six months after they began the Black Panthers, Seale and Newton heard about Mulford’s bill. They decided to dramatically demonstrate their opposition by going to the Capitol.
When they arrived, Ronald Reagan, then near the beginning of his eight years as governor, was on the Capitol lawn, hosting a gathering of eighth-graders. As the armed and fearsome-looking Panthers arrived, Reagan was hustled inside.
The visitors walked into the building, and headed for the Assembly chamber on the second floor, where they intended to read aloud “Executive Mandate Number 1,” a statement in opposition to the Mulford Bill. They were not allowed to enter the chamber, so they went outside and read the statement on the front lawn.
So once again, can you provide FACTUAL EVIDENCE that the Black Panthers TOOK OVER the Capitol back in 1967 and that wording certainly implied the US Capitol. I'd bet you didn't even know it was Sacramento until I pointed it out. If you did know, then your original post was disingenuous...
That was your statement.