Whats going on in the World

Ruth Ginsburg dying on the court till 90 years old and the chaos the democrats created opposing the Republican candidate was sickening, not anyone accountable for false testimony… all forgotten, 20 years…

term limits for congress, both houses… would eliminate a lot of corruption… cellie…
 
CELLFISH said:
Ruth Ginsburg dying on the court till 90 years old and the chaos the democrats created opposing the Republican candidate was sickening, not anyone accountable for false testimony… all forgotten, 20 years…

term limits for congress, both houses… would eliminate a lot of corruption… cellie…
Click to expand...

Term limts for politicians certainly would. Although one could argue that there is a mechanism for that already.

However, they chose to make these appointments for life for a reason.
 
OVERBORED said:
With so many GREAT legal minds in this country, Thomas should never have been on the bench to begin with!
Click to expand...

And Darth Vader Ginsberg, who said she wouldn't write the U.S. Constitution for the country today should?

At least Thomas knows what the constitution is about. He may be the only one on the court that actually does.
 

U.S. economy added 253,000 jobs in April, powering economy through turmoil​

The unemployment rate dropped to 3.4 percent last month, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report released Friday.​

 
CELLFISH said:
Ruth Ginsburg dying on the court till 90 years old and the chaos the democrats created opposing the Republican candidate was sickening, not anyone accountable for false testimony… all forgotten, 20 years…

term limits for congress, both houses… would eliminate a lot of corruption… cellie…
Click to expand...
THEY HAVE TERMS NOW AND HAVE TO RUN FOR RE-ELECTION
 
Avenger said:
If you're so concerned about the justices where's the scrutiny of Sotomayor's book deal?

nypost.com

Justice Sonia Sotomayor didn’t recuse herself from cases involving publisher that paid her $3M: report

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor didn’t recuse herself from multiple cases involving a book publisher – Penguin Random House – which paid her more than $3 million since 2010, according t…
nypost.com nypost.com

Seems a little selective on your part.
Click to expand...
Same as the right wingers here do.....they pick and choose and so will I

Thomas is a creep with a long history of abuses. Satomayor has what? this book thing? lol
 
CELLFISH said:
SELFISH…
Click to expand...

Selfish how? The founders didn't end up making a career of judgeship.

It was intended to avoid the influence of petty partisan politics and transitory public sentiment. You know, like what we see today. Using the court to push an agenda instead of adhering to the constitution and the law.

Like everything else, it doesn't work perfectly, since activists get appointed instead of objective jurists, but I'll take the risks of that vs the short-term convenient.
 
movetheboat said:
Same as the right wingers here do.....they pick and choose and so will I

Thomas is a creep with a long history of abuses. Satomayor has what? this book thing? lol
Click to expand...

That's true. But your lack of objectivity is okay when theirs isn't?

The provocateur strikes again.

Thomas has been subject to unsubstantiated accusations and attacks because he rejects the left agenda.

It's particularly egregious because he chose to walk off the Democrat plantation and doesn't appreciate all the good work of the covert racist advocates that would do such good things for him if he'd only understand how wonderful their righteous intentions were.
 
Avenger said:
That's true. But your lack of objectivity is okay when theirs isn't?

The provocateur strikes again.

Thomas has been subject to unsubstantiated accusations and attacks because he rejects the left agenda.

It's particularly egregious because he chose to walk off the Democrat plantation and doesn't appreciate all the good work of the covert racist advocates that would do such good things for him if he'd only understand how wonderful their righteous intentions were.
Click to expand...
I'm ok with their objectivity and expect it
 
OVERBORED said:
Still can't wrap my head around a court deciding what a woman can to with her body.
Click to expand...

First off, the SCOTUS never said anything about what a woman can or cannot do.

They said it's not a federal issue.

Poor understanding on your part.

Just like the idea that it's only a woman's body that is involved.
 
Today is CINCO DE MAYO....Hug a Mexcan and tomorrow we can go back to hate SI?

EVERY Mexican American will work their ass off today as usual to celebrate CINCO DE MAYO....The Gringos will drink Corona..eat Tortillas....And party for them!!!

three-amigos-plethora.gif
 
Avenger said:
First off, the SCOTUS never said anything about what a woman can or cannot do.

They said it's not a federal issue.

Poor understanding on your part.

Just like the idea that it's only a woman's body that is involved.
Click to expand...
The pro life conservatives are not against capital punishment or war?? strange....these people are already born and alive WTF?
 
Microorganisms are the “Life” scientists hope to find on other planets. Smaller than the eye can see (It’s A Miracle).
Meanwhile back at third rock from the sun there are idiots that don’t want admit if it has a heartbeat it is alive (Just A Clump Of Cells).
 
Avenger said:
First off, the SCOTUS never said anything about what a woman can or cannot do.

They said it's not a federal issue.

Poor understanding on your part.

Just like the idea that it's only a woman's body that is involved.
Click to expand...
Semantics. Nothing more.

Abortion is a medical procedure. Make it illegal, the choice is taken away.
And you're right. It doesn't only affect a woman's body. It effects the rest of her life.
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Members online

Total: 523 (members: 17, guests: 506)

Fishing Reports

Latest posts

Latest articles

Back
Top