Matts
Angler
Exactly. A nation of fools that don't have the slightest clue about engineering or thermodynamics thrown in a panic by the media, spoon-feeding fear. Pretty much all they do. Good for ratings, you know.
I was just watching a documentary about the Concorde and of course they show the protesters. One of these morons is holding a sign about protecting the ozone layer. Ummmm, the Concorde created ozone when it flew. And it created it at altitude, where it would benefit the ozone layer. Low altitude ozone is bad. We call it smog. Up there it's supposed to protect us from UV. But here's someone who's so concerned about the planet that they took the time to make a sign and go to a protest,... making a claim that is 180° away from the reality. Doesn't matter. They DID something.
Whatever happened to the ozone crisis anyway? I guess it served it's purpose and we've moved on?
Ozone is bad for us if we breathe it, but valuable to have up high in the atmosphere.
Some things are bad for us to breathe, but serve useful purposes. Chlorine gas can be a valuable disinfectant, but will kill you if you breathe too much of it.
Ozone, a triple molecule of oxygen atoms, is the same way. Ozone at ground- level is an air pollutant that is a key component of smog, harmful to breathe, and can damage to crops, trees and other vegetation. However, ozone in the stratosphere, where we do not come into contact with it, forms the "ozone layer", which extends upward from about 6 to 30 miles and protects life on Earth from the sun's harmful ultraviolet (UV) rays.
Similarly, CFC emissions are harmless in the lower atmosphere, but are still believed to rise to the ozone layer and diminish its effectiveness. Anti-CFC regulations are still in force, even if most folks are tired of hearing about the ozone layer. Here's a 2018 report from NOAA on ozone depletion. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018