the "Headline That Caught My Attention or the WTF" thread

NY Times, yeah one of those "MSM" outlets some here love to dump on, has published a very interesting article.

A Close Look at Some Key Evidence in the Gaza Hospital Blast

A widely cited missile video does not shed light on what happened, a Times analysis concludes.
The video shows a projectile streaking through the darkened skies over Gaza and exploding in the air. Seconds later, another explosion is seen on the ground.

The footage has become a widely cited piece of evidence as Israeli and American officials have made the case that an errant Palestinian rocket malfunctioned in the sky, fell to the ground and caused a deadly explosion at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City.

But a detailed visual analysis by The New York Times concludes that the video clip — taken from an Al Jazeera television camera livestreaming on the night of Oct. 17 — shows something else. The missile seen in the video is most likely not what caused the explosion at the hospital. It actually detonated in the sky roughly two miles away, The Times found, and is an unrelated aspect of the fighting that unfolded over the Israeli-Gaza border that night.

The Times’s finding does not answer what actually did cause the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital blast, or who is responsible. The contention by Israeli and American intelligence agencies that a failed Palestinian rocket launch is to blame remains plausible. But the Times analysis does cast doubt on one of the most-publicized pieces of evidence that Israeli officials have used to make their case and complicates the straightforward narrative they have put forth.


I'm in a benevolent mood, so I used up one of my monthly shares to enable those who'd care to read it in its entirety, including video clips, may do so.

Gaza Hospital Explosion
 
NY Times, yeah one of those "MSM" outlets some here love to dump on, has published a very interesting article.

A Close Look at Some Key Evidence in the Gaza Hospital Blast

A widely cited missile video does not shed light on what happened, a Times analysis concludes.
The video shows a projectile streaking through the darkened skies over Gaza and exploding in the air. Seconds later, another explosion is seen on the ground.

The footage has become a widely cited piece of evidence as Israeli and American officials have made the case that an errant Palestinian rocket malfunctioned in the sky, fell to the ground and caused a deadly explosion at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City.

But a detailed visual analysis by The New York Times concludes that the video clip — taken from an Al Jazeera television camera livestreaming on the night of Oct. 17 — shows something else. The missile seen in the video is most likely not what caused the explosion at the hospital. It actually detonated in the sky roughly two miles away, The Times found, and is an unrelated aspect of the fighting that unfolded over the Israeli-Gaza border that night.

The Times’s finding does not answer what actually did cause the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital blast, or who is responsible. The contention by Israeli and American intelligence agencies that a failed Palestinian rocket launch is to blame remains plausible. But the Times analysis does cast doubt on one of the most-publicized pieces of evidence that Israeli officials have used to make their case and complicates the straightforward narrative they have put forth.


I'm in a benevolent mood, so I used up one of my monthly shares to enable those who'd care to read it in its entirety, including video clips, may do so.

Gaza Hospital Explosion

LOL, if their analysis had reached a firm conclusion that it was indeed a failed Hamas rocket - the article would have never seen the light of day.
 

Interesting, some people I know kept paying, knocking down principal, so the "restart" would be on a smaller principal as the total payment went to principal. Kudos for their financial responsibilities and smart use of their finances to clear the debt.
 
Here is where it became interesting.

A week after the hospital tragedy, much remains in question.

The death toll, initially put at 500 by Hamas and then lowered to 471, is believed by Western intelligence agencies to be considerably lower — but no number has been verified. The hospital itself was not directly struck; whatever caused the explosion actually hit the hospital courtyard, where people had gathered for safety, and a handful of parked cars.

Moreover, the crater left from the impact was relatively small, a fact that Israel has cited in arguing that none of its munitions caused the blast, and could be consistent with a number of different munitions. Hamas has not produced a remnant of an Israeli munition or any physical evidence to back up its claim that Israel is responsible.

U.S. intelligence officials said on Tuesday that agencies had assessed that the video shows a Palestinian rocket launched from Gaza undergoing a “catastrophic motor failure” before part of the rocket crashed into the hospital grounds. A senior intelligence official said the authorities could not rule out that new information would come to light that would change their assessment but said they had high confidence in their conclusions.
 
Last edited:
Here is where it became interesting.

A week after the hospital tragedy, much remains in question.

The death toll, initially put at 500 by Hamas and then lowered to 471, is believed by Western intelligence agencies to be considerably lower — but no number has been verified. The hospital itself was not directly struck; whatever caused the explosion actually hit the hospital courtyard, where people had gathered for safety, and a handful of parked cars.

Moreover, the crater left from the impact was relatively small, a fact that Israel has cited in arguing that none of its munitions caused the blast, and could be consistent with a number of different munitions. Hamas has not produced a remnant of an Israeli munition or any physical evidence to back up its claim that Israel is responsible.

U.S. intelligence officials said on Tuesday that agencies had assessed that the video shows a Palestinian rocket launched from Gaza undergoing a “catastrophic motor failure” before part of the rocket crashed into the hospital grounds. A senior intelligence official said the authorities could not rule out that new information would come to light that would change their assessment but said they had high confidence in their conclusions.
from what I've been reading & seeing - the damage does not present itself as an airstrike - i.e. as you stated above the blast crater is too small

other sources seem to say the damage is more in line with a fuel explosion - which makes sense as the rocket had just been launched & was still carrying its full fuel load. I saw footage from Israel's Iron Dome system which was tacking that grouping of rockets from the moment of launch - "the tracks" show a group of rockets taking off & then one of them heads straight down near the location of the hospital

A fuel explosion would account for all the fire damage to the vehicles in the parking lot next to the hospital. They weren't so much destroyed or blown apart like you would expect from a missle or bomb expolsion. They were "toasted" or burned.

CNN at one point showed the tracking data from the Iron Dome the day or so after the incident. I saw that & it was obvious that one rocket from the group had split off from the rest & headed downward. Looking like a misfire or some sort of malfunction.
 
Well any remaining shred of serenity on the North Fork is now shot to hell thanks to it being highlighted on a NY Times "36 Hours In..." article. Love the porgy fishing comment, obviously written by "Clueless on Manhattan".

36 Hours on the North Fork
Unfortunately, NONE of what they can write about is any sort of secret anymore and not likely to have any worse effect than is already happening.
Hell, I hear its gotten to the point that people from WAY up island in the Patchogue are are now coming all the way out here to get pumpkins and clog up the roads on nice fall Sunday afternoons :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
No respect. No fear. Each day a bit more dangerous world.


U.S. military officials said they were "concerned" by the Chinese pilot's behavior, claiming China's recent history of similar stunts puts peace in the region at risk.

Wow that is very stern. :rolleyes:
 
Some real lookers in Maine. Oh and look at that the suspect drives a Subaru. ?
IMG_8984.webp

Guess the Saturn was down.
 

You mean you can't sell products that customers don't want to buy? Do tell.

Lee Iacocca said that in his book in the what, eighties? That people ragged on Chrysler for building these big cars during the oil embargo when they should have been building small econo-boxes. But he pointed out that there were smaller, more efficient cars in their product offerings. People weren't buying them. They were buying the land yachts. He pointed out that building products that you can't sell is the road to bankruptcy. Customers buy what they want. Not what someone else thinks they should buy. Witness the proliferation of SUVs and Crossovers and how few sedan offerings there are.

EVs have severe limitations that nobody will publicly acknowledge. If they do they're chastised and ridiculed as hating the planet and just being against change. Yet the car buyers are quietly voting with their dollars. Gotta love them free markets.
 
Interesting quandary here. Is it the alcohol here, or is it as it wears off, you've realized that you're with a "double bagger" horrifying you???

Alcohol Might Be Ruining Your Orgasm

How much and how often you drink can affect your ability to climax during sexual activity.

Emma Schmidt, a clinical sexologist in Cincinnati, has lost track of the number of clients she’s seen for low libido and problems orgasming after they’ve first visited a doctor who advised them to “Just relax and have a glass of wine.

That type of suggestion is not just dismissive, Dr. Schmidt said, but it highlights the gaps in our collective understanding about the interplay between alcohol and sex.

After years of contradictory findings, recent research has made it clear that even moderate drinking poses risks to your overall health. But the question of how alcohol affects sexual health — specifically, orgasms — can be a bit fuzzier.

“Society has long depicted alcohol as a crucial ingredient for romantic encounters,” said Catalina Lawsin, a clinical psychologist who specializes in sexuality. She added that people often mix sex and alcohol because it relaxes them and offers a sense of escapism — and because of a widely held belief that alcohol “elevates sexual prowess and pleasure.”

But the reality, she said, is much more complex.
 
Nothing remains from the Dutch "New Amsterdam" era, and now the single reminder of colonial Manhattan residences is falling apart. Very said that there seems to be little, if any, interest in Manhattan's history...

Why Has This 258-Year-Old Mansion Been Left to Fall Apart?

The historic Morris-Jumel Mansion is the “crown jewel of Sugar Hill” in Manhattan — and a victim of bureaucratic and financial neglect.

A white four-columned colonial mansion shaded by a towering oak tree.

Built in 1765 as a summer place for a British loyalist, the mansion serves as a monument to the highest ideals of the colonial era — and to some of its most exquisite gossip.Credit...Sara Hylton for The New York Times

The Morris-Jumel Mansion, designed in the neo-Palladian style, is the oldest surviving house in Manhattan, an irreplaceable artifact described by Duke Ellington as “the crown jewel of Sugar Hill,” one of the places where Lin-Manuel Miranda composed songs for “Hamilton.” In its current life, it supplies a strange and unwelcome souvenir — pieces of itself. The building has been so badly maintained that it is possible to touch it and walk away with a moist, splintered clump of wood siding in the palm of your hand.

The mansion was built in 1765 as a summer place for a British loyalist, and its age alone might have indemnified it against all too obvious neglect. But the house also serves as a monument to the highest ideals of the American Enlightenment era and some of its most exquisite gossip.

Once a base of operations for George Washington during the Revolutionary War, it eventually became the home of Eliza Jumel, who was born in a Rhode Island bordello run by a Black madam and rose to become one of the richest and most liberated women in the country, tripling a fortune based largely on her own shrewd real-estate investments. Her cook was Anne Northup, the wife of the abolitionist Solomon Northup, who wrote “Twelve Years a Slave.”

For a while, Aaron Burr lived in the mansion as well. Jumel married him 14 months after her first husband, a rich wine merchant, died after landing on a pitchfork during a mysterious fall from a hay wagon. When she divorced Burr, who was tearing through her money as if he were trying out for the Real Husbands of the Continental Army, she hired Alexander Hamilton Jr. to represent her and presumably enjoy some karmic retribution.

Despite the singular pedigree of the house and its standing in one of the wealthiest cities in the world, it has been left to deteriorate. On a hill above Coogan’s Bluff, it looks ghostly from whatever direction you approach. The paint on the exterior is peeling on all sides. Over last winter, one of the four columns on the front porch collapsed, leaving that portion of the building to be propped up by scaffolding and necessitating a study about what caused the fall.

For years now, Kurt Thometz, a dealer of rare books, and his wife, Camilla Huey, a celebrated dressmaker and costume designer, have watched the decay with increasing frustration from their brownstone across the street. They moved to the neighborhood 19 years ago via Brooklyn Heights and the West Village, two of the wealthiest and most historic quarters of the city, where a house like the Morris-Jumel Mansion would ignite robust philanthropic interest as soon as a shingle was askew. Washington Heights is a predominantly Hispanic area with a poverty rate above the city average.


Ms. Huey believed that broken-windows theory applied here as well, she told me as we circled the former estate one afternoon — that it was hard to see how civic pride might be fostered in a neighborhood that has watched its most precious material asset fall into such disrepair.

Money was the problem because it is always the problem, but in this instance, it isn’t the only or even the most meaningful one. In 2014, Carol Ward, then the mansion’s executive director, secured $1.2 million in grant money for the rehabilitation of the building, with financing coming from local elected officials including Gale Brewer, who was the Manhattan Borough president at the time.

But the money languished with the city’s Parks Department, which is responsible for maintaining the building’s facade and grounds, not the very well preserved interiors. However self-sabotaging in an instance like this, it has long been the practice of the department to hold off on beginning capital projects until they are fully funded, which risks that structural problems might only worsen as time passes.

The initial money raised was insufficient, but by the time an additional $1.5 million was found — seven years later in 2021 — the scope of the project only got bigger and inflation had driven up the costs. Since then, millions more have been needed from elected officials to complete the work.

Even with more than $5 million in government money currently earmarked, the first phase of the restoration will not begin until next summer, according to the Parks Department, largely because of all the stages of review required for a landmarked building, which inevitably involve several different slow-moving city agencies.

Those who live in the historic district surrounding the house blame not only an inert bureaucracy for what has happened but also the mansion’s board of trustees, which includes no prominent constituent of the city’s giving circles and which has failed to cultivate wealthy donors.

The notion that “the board has been lax in passion is the farthest thing from the truth,” Lisa Koenigsberg, an architectural historian and the board’s chair, told me. “We agonize just as much as the neighbors do. I understand the frustration and the sadness over the building,” she said. “There are these processes and procedures and needs and then these inevitable delays.” When I asked her about the lack of private funding, she said: “It wouldn’t make sense to look for nonpublic money. The building is the city’s responsibility.” This is a curious response in a place where public-private partnerships make most of our cultural life possible.

When the preservation movement took hold in New York in the early 1960s, the goal was to prevent beautiful buildings from being destroyed. In more recent years, the work has tilted from defense to offense, the effort to strike down plans for aesthetically dubious projects to come to life in the first place. On any given day, a neighborhood group is fighting a proposal for a building that is too tall, too ugly, too alienating, too out of character for a place with an intimate, cobblestone sense of itself. Often, that war is at odds with the city’s affordable housing ambitions; sometimes it further obscures the history that is suppressed for political inconvenience or simply allowed to fade from view.

Ten years ago, Camilla Huey mounted an exhibit at the mansion of elaborate corsets she made as a testament to the women close to Aaron Burr, who brought up his daughter Theodosia to “convince” the world that “women have souls.” As she put it, the house is the living embodiment of the complex equation of this country. “The rot and decay is evidence of profound contempt.”
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top