Whats going on in the World

How about we start a pool for bragging rights to see how many hours it takes for the Trump’d (yes, pun intended) up charges against James Comey to be dismissed?

I say under 54 hours no later than 4:00pm Friday.

I’ll go with 51 hours
So, I posted an article by Jonathan Turley awhile back and I believe you called him a "hack" or whatever derogatory term you used because he writes for Fox News.

Take a look at this one. Well written. He shot this one out last night.

 

Speaking at the Norges Bank Investment Management 2026 Investment Conference in Oslo, Griffin questioned the "demonizing" of business leaders.

"What upset me was the personal attack," Griffin said. "Like, you were at the White House Correspondents' Dinner on Saturday where they tried to assassinate the president. Not too far from where I live in New York is where they assassinated the CEO of UnitedHealthcare."

"So I think the willingness of the mayor of New York to make this policy debate a personal attack just demonstrated a profound lack of judgment," he added. "I understand that New York has bills to pay."

Following the video, Griffin—who primarily resides in Florida—signaled that he might cancel his latest project in Midtown Manhattan. He is currently slated to meet with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul to discuss the "future direction of New York."

"Here's the real question: is New York going to put their fiscal house in order and run itself from a position of a strong government that is pro-business, or are they looking to play ... why do the Americans think we can do socialism?" he asked. "We have none of that in our DNA and we are just going to screw it up."

On April 15, Mamdani posted a video spotlighting Griffin's property to announce a new pied-à-terre tax. The move prompted the hedge fund CEO to threaten to pull a $6 billion development project from the city.

PLEASE pull this out of NYC - there a many friendlier states who want investment, law and order, etc.

DO NOT make a mistake and trust them.
 
So, I posted an article by Jonathan Turley awhile back and I believe you called him a "hack" or whatever derogatory term you used because he writes for Fox News.

Take a look at this one. Well written. He shot this one out last night.

Jonathan Turley knows who butters his bread, Fox. Agreed, a well written article, although he ends by alluding that there may be some unknown at the moment further evidence that supports the indictment. He is the only person I have heard alluding to that. Drop to her knees Pam Bondi couldn’t get it done and by all accounts from any other prosecutors that have weighed in this is all BS. Of course Jonathan, knowing who butters his bread, needs to leave a glimme of hope for MAGA.

Scott Jenning’s of CNN has much the same conundrum in that he must always find ways to support Trump even in when it’s laughable to attempt to try and defend him.

Both Scott & Jonathan want to stay on the gravy train and will say whatever they have to keep the money flowing.
 
Scott Adam’s basically lost his livelihood as a result of the disparaging words he spoke. The overwhelming consensus was that his words were racist. The result was he dropped like a hot potato.

You're just repeating the ad-hominem. You still haven't addressed his point and the poll that he was quoting.

I believe I know what you are trying to say about professionalism, however I disagree with the labeling, title.

1. I think “professionalism” is the wrong word you are trying to convey. Professionalism has to do more with accomplishments of one’s own methods, and practices opposed to amateur. I think want you want to convey would perhaps be better titled “integrity” which might be better suited as it refers to righteousness, and rectitude. Of course it would be your thread if you decide to start it so you can name it anything you like.

We can get bogged down in semantics, but I was referring more to the connotation of the word than the definition of getting paid. Actually, your observation about righteousness and rectitude leans to the antithesis of my point. Let's take your buddy Comey as an example. He failed to do his job in a professional manner. He let his personal biases and politics influence how he administered the law. He lost objectivity and tried to insert his personal sense of morality into the performance of his duties, which is far too common today on both sides.

2. I don’t think the SPLC ever finished the initial work they set out to do, in fact I believe the challenges they face today are immense.

You talked about not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. That baby grew up and moved out a long time ago. Now they're just stirring the bathwater. See below.

3. Barack Obama. I voted for McCain & Romney, and lost both of course. I had been a registered Republican my entire life until Trump came along. I then switched to an Independent. Although my candidates lost, I was felt very proud to be an American when Barack won. I thought we had come a long way as a country to elect a black man.

I don’t see Barack as having anything to do with worsening race relations other than the fact that he was black and that brought out the many racist in this country that still exist to this day, including President Trump who claimed he wasn’t born here.

Interesting. When I first registered to vote I registered as Independent. And I still think of myself that way. However, I came to realize that it gave me no voice in primaries. So, since my leanings are more towards the Republican party, I registered Republican. But congratulations on disenfranchising yourself to protest against one candidate.

I'm not denying that racism exists. It will always exist in some form, it's the history of the world. But as you spoke of being proud of a country that elected a black president, it certainly proved that America was far less racist than in the past. Part of the proof of how well we we're doing is that all the race hustlers have to dig further and further into the past to find things to be outraged about. Or they need to keep fabricating new divisions in order to justify themselves. Interestingly, since the SPLC is the one that names hate groups and symbols it's pretty easy for them to ramp up the list to claim that things are worse. Funny how in your add-hominem attack on Stossel you said he focused on negativity. I disagree, but don't all of these advocacy groups do that?

Also, Barack did a huge disservice to race-relations in America. He could have continued to move us out of the focus on race. Instead, he doubled-down on it. Personally, and I think a lot of people, don't really give a $#it what color or type of plumbing the president has. I'm much more concerned with how they're going to lead. Obama led through the eyes of race. Just like the SPLC. When the only tool you have is a hammer...
 
Jonathan Turley knows who butters his bread, Fox. Agreed, a well written article, although he ends by alluding that there may be some unknown at the moment further evidence that supports the indictment. He is the only person I have heard alluding to that. Drop to her knees Pam Bondi couldn’t get it done and by all accounts from any other prosecutors that have weighed in this is all BS. Of course Jonathan, knowing who butters his bread, needs to leave a glimme of hope for MAGA.

Scott Jenning’s of CNN has much the same conundrum in that he must always find ways to support Trump even in when it’s laughable to attempt to try and defend him.

Both Scott & Jonathan want to stay on the gravy train and will say whatever they have to keep the money flowing.
Agreed, a well written article, although he ends by alluding that there may be some unknown at the moment further evidence that supports the indictment.

Smart comment, he does not have all the details. As I read it, it will be dismissed.

Of course Jonathan, knowing who butters his bread, needs to leave a glimme of hope for MAGA.


First, I am pretty sure he does not need the money. He has commented on many topics and various outlets throughout his career. Ahh, you are just reaching, another reason to use the MAGA word, etc.
 

Democratic lawmakers, who have frequently accused President Donald Trump of acting like a "king" upon his return to the White House, were brutally mocked on Tuesday for applauding and warmly greeting King Charles III during his joint address to Congress.

"Quite the confusing scene on the House floor today. Many of Congressman Hamadeh's Democratic colleagues, who have spent months chanting 'No Kings,' just gave one a standing ovation," Arizona Republican Rep. Abe Hamadeh's office posted to X.
 

Pure insanity. Anything the left touches.................

I just read how CA has spent $450 million to upgrade their 911 system to the digital age and after 7 years - they basically have nothing. Almost makes NY look like amateurs.
 

GHETTO CROCKETT: “The level of disrespect that is continuously lobbed against us as black women. I am one of the 535 most powerful people in this country.”

“For some reason, you think we on the same level, but you gonna disrespect me?"
 
Would have been in that pricks face as fast as I could if that happened in front of me. No fucking patience for these pricks. They closed the road down because of that asshole. Hope it was because someone offed him for being so stupid.
 

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top