the "Headline That Caught My Attention or the WTF" thread

I was way ahead of Lil Nax X!! During the Toxic Shock Episode of 1980 I attended a Halloween party dressed as a Tampon, no ketchup nor other red colors, with the words "P&G Factory Team" emblazed on my white hazmat suit, along with a rope dangling from my waist.

At that party, I met my wife. When folks ask her WTH?, the response is usually something like, "Yeah, I had a feeling there was something not quite right about him the first time we met"...
 
SMH, I still call "Long Tail Ducks" Old Squaws and will never change. I seriously doubt few people know the history of folks like Audubon beyond, "He's the bird guy". Seems to be a huge effort with little benefit, and begs the question if any birds named or other honors regarding slave-owning Founding Fathers, the majority of them, will be changed?

Dozens of bird names honoring enslavers and racists will be changed

The American Ornithological Society says it will alter all human names of North American birds, starting with up to 80 species.

After two years of discussion and debate, the nation’s premier birding organization has decided that birds should not have human names.

The American Ornithological Society announced Wednesday that it will remove names given to North American birds in honor of people and replace them with monikers that better describe their plumage and other characteristics. The group said it will prioritize birds whose names trace to enslavers, white supremacists and robbers of Indigenous graves. Among them is one of the most famous birders in U.S. history, John James Audubon.

“There is power in a name, and some English bird names have associations with the past that continue to be exclusionary and harmful today,” the society’s president, Colleen Handel, said in a statement. “We need a much more inclusive and engaging scientific process that focuses attention on the unique features and beauty of the birds themselves.”

Sometime next year, the society is expected to appoint a committee to explore up to 80 new names. The move, at an organization known for its reluctance to rename birds, was surprising even to the activists within the group who requested it after a White woman in Central Park falsely accused a Black birder of assault in 2020. In a racial reckoning that shook the field of ornithology, the activists, most of them White, argued that the names of some birds were offensive to people of color.

“We have seen a lot of changes in our world in the recent past,” Sara Morris, the society’s president-elect, said in reference to racial justice protests that followed George Floyd’s murder by a Minneapolis police officer and the Central Park incident involving birder Christian Cooper.

Racial insensitivity in the overwhelmingly White field of ornithology and birding should be rejected, Morris said. Recent reports projected that North America has lost 3 billion birds in the last 50 years, and “we need to engage as many people as we can in the enjoyment, study and conservation of birds as we can,” said Morris. “We need to break down as many barriers to participation as we can.”

Not every birder in the 2,700-member society is expected to welcome the news. Some who’ve memorized names established for more than a century are likely to push back. “Are we expecting that people won’t agree with this decision – sure,” Morris said. “But we’re proud of this decision. As we talked to people, many of them changed their minds.”

Jordan Rutter, a birder who organized the petition with her fiancé, Gabriel Foley, said the society’s action left her speechless. “That’s everything we asked,” said Rutter, who co-founded the group Bird Names for Birds, which listed about a dozen men honored with bird names and described their racist pasts. “I never thought this would be happening. . . . What an incredible moment for the birding community.”

For the time being, birders of color who spot the Townsend’s warbler and the Townsend’s solitaire might be startled by the history of their namesake, John Kirk Townsend. His journals describe his collection of skulls, stolen from the graves of Native people in the 1800s, to promote his theory that they were racially inferior.

In North America, where Indigenous tribes in what are now the United States and Canada encountered and named wild birds centuries before the arrival of European settlers, “White people are credited for discovering [the birds]. White people were the ones to name the birds after other White people. And White people are still the folks that are perpetuating these names,” Rutter said in a 2021 interview with The Washington Post.

At least two chapters of the National Audubon Society voted to change their names and distance themselves from the enslaver who detested abolitionists and, by his own account, once guided a family of escapees back to their enslaver. The Audubon’s shearwater and Audubon’s oriole were named to honor him.

Black birders who trace the Bachman’s sparrow and Bachman’s warbler to the man they immortalized, John Bachman, might find this passage in one of his speeches: “That the Negro will remain as he is, unless his form is changed by an amalgamation, which . . . is revolting to us. That his intellect . . . is greatly inferior to that of the Caucasian, and that he is, therefore . . . incapable of self-government. That he is thrown to our protection. That our defense of slavery is contained within the Holy scriptures.”

Two members of Bird Names for Birds, Jess McLaughlin and Alex Holt, confirmed this history in library archives and helped bring it to the ornithological society’s attention, Rutter said. “It wasn’t, ‘Take our word for it.’ The evidence was right there.”

The society and its predecessor, the American Ornithologists’ Union, have managed a list of English-language bird names in North America since 1886. They are used by schools, government, conservationists, birders and other groups, the statement said.

Erica Nol, co-chair of the society’s Ad Hoc Committee on English Bird Names, said members took the issue seriously from the day the committee was formed more than a year ago. Meeting every two weeks via Zoom, they came up with a priority list of names to consider changing.

At first, the diverse White, Black and Latino members failed to arrive at a consensus. In addition to North American birds, they mulled changing the names of South American birds but eventually decided that it was not their place.

Months later, the members came to the realization that all eponymous names were problematic. “They imply possession of a species,” Nol said. “They are overwhelmingly from a particular time and social fabric, they are almost all White men, few women, and women were almost all first names. Our main goal was to increase the birdwatching public.”

The committee startled the society’s leadership with its recommendation to change all English bird names and at least two cultural names of birds that did not make sense. “The name should be descriptive of the bird,” Nol said.
 
SMH, I still call "Long Tail Ducks" Old Squaws and will never change. I seriously doubt few people know the history of folks like Audubon beyond, "He's the bird guy". Seems to be a huge effort with little benefit, and begs the question if any birds named or other honors regarding slave-owning Founding Fathers, the majority of them, will be changed?

Dozens of bird names honoring enslavers and racists will be changed

The American Ornithological Society says it will alter all human names of North American birds, starting with up to 80 species.

After two years of discussion and debate, the nation’s premier birding organization has decided that birds should not have human names.

The American Ornithological Society announced Wednesday that it will remove names given to North American birds in honor of people and replace them with monikers that better describe their plumage and other characteristics. The group said it will prioritize birds whose names trace to enslavers, white supremacists and robbers of Indigenous graves. Among them is one of the most famous birders in U.S. history, John James Audubon.

“There is power in a name, and some English bird names have associations with the past that continue to be exclusionary and harmful today,” the society’s president, Colleen Handel, said in a statement. “We need a much more inclusive and engaging scientific process that focuses attention on the unique features and beauty of the birds themselves.”

Sometime next year, the society is expected to appoint a committee to explore up to 80 new names. The move, at an organization known for its reluctance to rename birds, was surprising even to the activists within the group who requested it after a White woman in Central Park falsely accused a Black birder of assault in 2020. In a racial reckoning that shook the field of ornithology, the activists, most of them White, argued that the names of some birds were offensive to people of color.

“We have seen a lot of changes in our world in the recent past,” Sara Morris, the society’s president-elect, said in reference to racial justice protests that followed George Floyd’s murder by a Minneapolis police officer and the Central Park incident involving birder Christian Cooper.

Racial insensitivity in the overwhelmingly White field of ornithology and birding should be rejected, Morris said. Recent reports projected that North America has lost 3 billion birds in the last 50 years, and “we need to engage as many people as we can in the enjoyment, study and conservation of birds as we can,” said Morris. “We need to break down as many barriers to participation as we can.”

Not every birder in the 2,700-member society is expected to welcome the news. Some who’ve memorized names established for more than a century are likely to push back. “Are we expecting that people won’t agree with this decision – sure,” Morris said. “But we’re proud of this decision. As we talked to people, many of them changed their minds.”

Jordan Rutter, a birder who organized the petition with her fiancé, Gabriel Foley, said the society’s action left her speechless. “That’s everything we asked,” said Rutter, who co-founded the group Bird Names for Birds, which listed about a dozen men honored with bird names and described their racist pasts. “I never thought this would be happening. . . . What an incredible moment for the birding community.”

For the time being, birders of color who spot the Townsend’s warbler and the Townsend’s solitaire might be startled by the history of their namesake, John Kirk Townsend. His journals describe his collection of skulls, stolen from the graves of Native people in the 1800s, to promote his theory that they were racially inferior.

In North America, where Indigenous tribes in what are now the United States and Canada encountered and named wild birds centuries before the arrival of European settlers, “White people are credited for discovering [the birds]. White people were the ones to name the birds after other White people. And White people are still the folks that are perpetuating these names,” Rutter said in a 2021 interview with The Washington Post.

At least two chapters of the National Audubon Society voted to change their names and distance themselves from the enslaver who detested abolitionists and, by his own account, once guided a family of escapees back to their enslaver. The Audubon’s shearwater and Audubon’s oriole were named to honor him.

Black birders who trace the Bachman’s sparrow and Bachman’s warbler to the man they immortalized, John Bachman, might find this passage in one of his speeches: “That the Negro will remain as he is, unless his form is changed by an amalgamation, which . . . is revolting to us. That his intellect . . . is greatly inferior to that of the Caucasian, and that he is, therefore . . . incapable of self-government. That he is thrown to our protection. That our defense of slavery is contained within the Holy scriptures.”

Two members of Bird Names for Birds, Jess McLaughlin and Alex Holt, confirmed this history in library archives and helped bring it to the ornithological society’s attention, Rutter said. “It wasn’t, ‘Take our word for it.’ The evidence was right there.”

The society and its predecessor, the American Ornithologists’ Union, have managed a list of English-language bird names in North America since 1886. They are used by schools, government, conservationists, birders and other groups, the statement said.

Erica Nol, co-chair of the society’s Ad Hoc Committee on English Bird Names, said members took the issue seriously from the day the committee was formed more than a year ago. Meeting every two weeks via Zoom, they came up with a priority list of names to consider changing.

At first, the diverse White, Black and Latino members failed to arrive at a consensus. In addition to North American birds, they mulled changing the names of South American birds but eventually decided that it was not their place.

Months later, the members came to the realization that all eponymous names were problematic. “They imply possession of a species,” Nol said. “They are overwhelmingly from a particular time and social fabric, they are almost all White men, few women, and women were almost all first names. Our main goal was to increase the birdwatching public.”

The committee startled the society’s leadership with its recommendation to change all English bird names and at least two cultural names of birds that did not make sense. “The name should be descriptive of the bird,” Nol said.
Have you read this year's Maine ballot yet ? Scary !! WTF is wrong with people ??
 

We know the real reason. Plus -

The move may also benefit Bezos financially if he sells Amazon shares, since Florida, unlike Washington, does not have a capital gains tax. Washington recently enacted the 7% tax on the sale of financial assets.

Good luck replacing that tax revenue.
 
Said comment on the way health care has been tanking...

Mount Sinai Seeks to Close One of Lower Manhattan’s Last Hospitals

The private hospital system asked state regulators to close Mount Sinai Beth Israel, which serves a swath of Lower Manhattan that has already lost several major medical institutions.

One of the last remaining hospitals serving Lower Manhattan may well close next year, despite opposition from local officials and health activists who say the lessons of the pandemic are going unheeded.

Mount Sinai Health System asked state officials last week to approve a plan to close Mount Sinai Beth Israel, a major provider of medical care for Lower East Side residents that was founded in 1889. The hospital system said that its Beth Israel facility was losing money at too fast a pace and that it intended to shut it down in July 2024.

The closure would mean longer ambulance rides and wait times for some downtown residents having strokes and heart attacks, nurses who work at the hospital said. And it will most likely to lead to overcrowding and longer wait times in emergency rooms at hospitals farther uptown.

“People will likely die as a result,” said Sharlene Waylon, a nurse who has worked at the hospital for 41 years.

If it goes through, the hospital’s disappearance would leave the residents of Lower Manhattan with few major medical institutions. The largest hospital that would remain to serve that area would be NewYork-Presbyterian/Lower Manhattan hospital, a small institution that has fewer than 200 beds. Beth Israel, by contrast, officially has some 696 beds, although far fewer are staffed and some days only a quarter of them are filled with patients.

Most of the large hospitals serving neighborhoods that include Greenwich Village, the Lower East Side, Little Italy and Chinatown have been shuttered. In the last 20 years alone, Cabrini Hospital in the Gramercy Park neighborhood and St. Vincent’s Hospital in Greenwich Village have both closed.

“Lower Manhattan already has too few hospital beds, and the closure of Beth Israel will make that situation even worse,” said Lois Uttley, a longtime health care researcher and consultant who has tracked hospital consolidation and closures.

Just three years ago some hospitals were overwhelmed by a surge of patients during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic. That was especially the case in Queens, where years of hospital closures left the few remaining hospitals, including Elmhurst, overwhelmed.

During the first deadly phase of the pandemic, Beth Israel cared for more than 1,700 Covid patients — 165 of whom died, according to state statistics.

“Hopefully New York State has learned its lessons from the pandemic when there was not enough hospital capacity,” Ms. Uttley said.


State hospital regulators must approve Mount Sinai’s request. In that sense, its application to close Beth Israel represents something of a test: Has the pandemic changed the state’s approach to hospital closures, which it traditionally has been willing to approve, and has even encouraged?

Far more surgeries and medical care occur on an outpatient basis or entirely outside of hospitals than in the past, which has been the logic behind some decisions to close hospitals. But the reduction in hospital beds has exacerbated crowding in emergency rooms at hospitals across the city.

Mount Sinai has said that with patient occupancy so low, its Beth Israel campus is set to lose $150 million a year. “These continued and growing losses pose a real existential threat to the viability and future of the entire Mount Sinai Health system,” the president of the Beth Israel campus, Elizabeth Sellman, wrote in a letter to the state Health Department on Oct. 25.

The letter noted that Mount Sinai had invested in new facilities downtown, including a large behavioral health center on Rivington Street that opened this year.

On Thursday afternoon, Rose Kacic, who was born at Beth Israel 30 years ago, was visiting the hospital to see her 59-year-old mother, who had a range of health issues.

“It’s upsetting to know they’re closing down,” she said. “It’s a very essential part of the community,” she added. Her three brothers were also born at Beth Israel, and she said it had been her family’s hospital ever since her mother moved to New York from Puerto Rico.

“Now I got to worry about where to go if something major happens,” she said, noting that Bellevue, the next closest hospital, was 10 blocks away.

The local assemblyman, Harvey Epstein, expressed concern that Mount Sinai’s decision to close Beth Israel was motivated by what the hospital’s property could fetch if it was sold to developers.

“Is this just a real estate grab for them?” Mr. Epstein wondered in a phone interview this week.

The history of Beth Israel is linked to the influx of Jewish immigrants from Russia and Eastern Europe who settled in the Lower East Side in the late 19th century. In 1889, a group of these newcomers decided to form a dispensary and later a hospital. Not only did the Lower East Side, emerging as one of the most densely packed places on earth, need medical institutions of its own, but the newcomers also sought kosher food and culturally appropriate treatment.

Mount Sinai Hospital, farther uptown, was originally founded to care for indigent Jews and was staffed by many Jewish doctors, but it was regarded as unwelcoming to the unassimilated Jews from Russia.

Mount Sinai’s plans to close Beth Israel did not come out of nowhere. Mount Sinai and Beth Israel have been part of the same system for a decade, ever since Mount Sinai, a leading hospital at the edge of the Upper East Side and Harlem, merged with Continuum Health Partners, which ran Beth Israel and two St. Luke’s-Roosevelt campuses.

In 2016, Mount Sinai proposed closing Beth Israel and replacing it with a much smaller hospital of just 70 beds. But that plan was shelved amid the pandemic.
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top