Do they think we're idiots!

Today is World Whale Day. Notice how no where does it mention the threat of the windmills. They continue to lie about the climate change effect, yet not a peep on what is really going on.​




World Whale Day 2023​

World Whale Day is observed annually on the third Sunday in February. It is a wonderful opportunity to celebrate these magnificent aquatic mammals. Unfortunately, there are some threats to the wellbeing of whales. Ship collisions are one of the leading causes of serious injuries and non-natural death for these cetaceans. Commercial whaling, entanglement in fishing gear, pollution, climate change, global warming, oil and gas development, toxic contamination, and habitat degradation are the main threats faced by whales. World Whale Day provides an opportunity to voice concerns regarding the wellbeing of these marine mammals.
World Whale Day will be celebrated on Sunday, February 19, 2023.
World Whale Day
 
I am going to continue to post random info on this. There's just to much to follow.

This video is a bit tough to watch if you too appreciate these magnificent creatures. I strongly suggest checking out this video. It's a pod of dolphins beaching themselves on Friday. Not coincidently in the EXACT area of the surveying vessel. They are driving these mammals crazy. They are trying to escape the sounds which they think it's a threat.


Dolphins dying in NJ
 
Last edited:
Why are we not seeing "Save the Whales" Tee shirts and hoodies with a pic of a crossed out windmill ? One guess.
 
There was a rally in NJ today that drew over 1000 people. I heard that Bonni Brady, well known commercial fisheries representative gave a great talk. Hopefully this will continue to gain stream.
 

This record-breaking monopile is headed to the US’s first commercial offshore wind farm​

1676836875205.webp


Germany’s EEW Special Pipe Constructions (EEW SPC), which makes offshore wind monopiles, has completed its heaviest monopile yet for the US’s first commercial offshore wind farm.

The Rostock-based EEW SPC, on the Baltic coast, made the 1,895-ton steel monopile for Vineyard Wind 1, which is 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket and 35 miles from mainland Massachusetts. EEW SPC will turn more than 98,000 tons of steel into monopiles for the US project. The monopiles will each have a diameter of 31.4 feet and a maximum length of 279 feet.

For perspective: A fully loaded Boeing 747-8 airplane can weigh up to 447 tonnes when fully loaded with fuel, cargo, and passengers. So that means four fully loaded Boeing 747-8 airplanes would weigh approximately 1,953 tons.
 
I'm trying to get the entire doc, but below is a list of the allowable killing of over 2,800 whales and dolphins. Not to mention how accurate can that be? How many are never seen?

It also allows for the killing of 5 percent of the remaining 350 Atlantic right whales on the planet. The more I look the sadder it gets.

40DBA1CC-A308-4BBB-B4C2-ADA4BE021C18.webp
 
Starting to gain traction...

The $100 billion offshore wind industry has a whale problem

pressherald.com/2023/02/19/the-100-billion-offshore-wind-industry-has-a-whale-problem/

By Carly Wanna, Jennifer A Dlouhy and Josh Sau lFebruary 19, 2023
Sea-birds-and-Whale-tail-1676845880-1024x576.jpg

The offshore wind industry has a 40-ton problem on its hands.

Since early December, close to two dozen large whales have washed up on or near beaches on the U.S. Atlantic coast, and about a third of the so-called strandings have occurred on the shores of New Jersey. It’s unclear what exactly is fueling the deaths, but an unlikely coalition of wind opponents, local environmental groups and conservative talk show hosts have zeroed in on offshore wind as the culprit. They argue that projects in development are disrupting marine life and contributing to the unusually high number of deceased whales.

Government officials and the companies behind those wind projects remain firm: There is no evidence linking the whale mortalities to ongoing offshore wind development. They say New Jersey’s offshore wind ambitions are continuing as planned.

“Groups opposed to clean energy development are spreading misinformation,” said JC Sandberg, chief advocacy officer at American Clean Power Association, an industry organization. “They’ve seized on an opportunity to try and stop clean energy deployment along the East Coast.”

In January, a group of conservation organizations, led by Clean Ocean Action, and a coalition of a dozen New Jersey mayors penned two separate letters calling on Washington officials to halt offshore development activities near the state. In the weeks since, the issue has gained national attention. Climate-conscious news outlets are fact-checking the campaigns against offshore wind, while conservative talk show hosts such as Tucker Carlson claim outright that wind projects are killing whales. Some of those blaming offshore wind also have ties to conservative groups that have long opposed clean energy.

For all the finger-pointing, everyone does agree that a lot of whales are dying. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says an “unusual mortality event” for humpback whales along the Atlantic coast has been ongoing since 2016, well before the start of any significant offshore wind development there. Of the approximately 180 whale strandings NOAA has tracked since then, close to half have been examined. Roughly 40% showed evidence of a ship strike or entanglement connected to the cause of death.

None of those whale deaths have been linked directly to offshore wind development, but some marine scientists and wind-power foes argue that the lack of a proven connection doesn’t rule out the existence of one. Critics worry that the activities associated with offshore wind development, such as the driving of supports into the sea floor, can harm marine life.

Sean Hayes, chief of the protected species branch at NOAA’s Northeast Fisheries Science Center, warned ocean energy regulators last year that “additional noise, vessel traffic and habitat modifications due to offshore wind development will likely cause added stress” to whales and “result in additional population consequences” to the species.

Environmental groups also emphasize that, while the latest deaths aren’t tied to ongoing activity, more needs to be done to protect marine life from an array of threats, including future wind farm construction. “Any type of ocean industry is going to pose risks to the environment,” said Alison Chase, a senior policy analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council. It’s especially important to advance this new industry in a smart way because “ocean life is already struggling to adapt to climate change and has been stressed from decades of pollution and habitat destruction.”

A representative for New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy told Bloomberg in a statement on Friday that New Jersey will continue to pursue its offshore wind goals. “We know that many residents, both in our shore communities and across the state, share our genuine concern for marine life and its survival,” it says. “But we also know that there are those out there who are motivated not by a concern for our environment but by their own political ideologies and opposition to the very efforts that will preserve and protect our environment for generations to come.”

A 40-TON PR PROBLEM
The controversy has created a new headache for wind developers, who along with ACP are pushing back on the claims that their projects are hurting marine life. “We’re working hard to get the facts into the hands of local communities,” Sandberg said.

Among those talking points: ACP says offshore wind vessels account for just 2% of marine traffic along the East Coast, operate under strict regulations governing speed limits and are staffed with outside observers who watch for any disturbance to marine life.

Representatives for wind developers Vineyard Wind and Ørsted said they are focused on the safety of marine wildlife and echoed the point that their vessels are highly regulated. “Ørsted-contracted vessels have not experienced any whale strikes during offshore survey activity in the US,” a representative for the company said in an email.

Whale deaths are only the most recent obstacle for offshore wind. Inflation, high interest rates and supply chain woes have already threatened to derail projects along the East Coast, and the industry has plenty of experience with negative headlines and public opposition scuttling its plans. A big push to build a wind farm off the coast of Massachusetts was nixed in 2017 partly due to wealthy opponents who didn’t want to see the turbines from their beach houses.

Any delays to wind development along the northeastern shoreline could come at a high cost. Developers spent a record $4.4 billion last year just for the rights to install turbines off the coast of New York and New Jersey, in a blockbuster auction that underscored the surging enthusiasm for renewable energy. Building the actual wind farms will take much more investment, with a $10 billion price tag for some of the biggest projects. By 2030, total capital expenditures to achieve the country’s offshore wind targets could total some $100 billion, according to one estimate that has been cited by the U.S. Energy Department.

The companies building wind farms publish weekly reports describing their vessels and the work being performed; recent activity in the region has focused on site preparation. Vineyard Wind, for example, disclosed that eight vessels were laying undersea cables across Nantucket Sound off the coast of Massachusetts. A report from Avangrid shows that the utility is doing underwater drilling in its lease area, also off Massachusetts.

While offshore wind may not be perfect, supporters say it still beats the alternative: continuing to burn fossil fuels that are raising the world’s temperature. Elizabeth Klein – the newly appointed director of the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which oversees the industry – told Bloomberg in a Feb. 10 interview that while climate change creates urgency in the push for offshore wind, federal regulators are still moving carefully.

“There is an import to this work, but we are doing it, I think, in a really deliberate and respectful way to the concerns that communities have and making sure we hear that feedback, we incorporate it where we can and continue to move forward in a way that implements our mission of safely and responsibly managing energy development in the outer continental shelf,” Klein said.

Many Jersey Shore natives already had issues with local wind projects. Prior to this winter’s mammalian frenzy, beachside residents had developed a list of grievances with the turbines, including their high price tag and appearance.

“We believe that it’s going to destroy our tourism industry,” said Suzanne Hornick, a resident living in Ocean City, New Jersey, and a member of Protect Our Coast NJ. “When people come to Ocean City, they don’t want to look at an industrial park.” Meanwhile, companies developing the turbines argue that even on a clear day they will only be slightly visible.

On Sunday afternoon, Hornick plans to attend a Save The Whales rally on the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk, where locals will call for an end to the wind farm construction. Their timing couldn’t be better. “It’s World Whale Day,” she said.
 
The evidence is undeniable.

The question is, does it matter when industry and government are in bed together on this?

They are hell bent on electrifying the country at whatever cost!
 
The evidence is undeniable.

The question is, does it matter when industry and government are in bed together on this?

They are hell bent on electrifying the country at whatever cost!
It's frustrating as hell. I honestly believe that if enough pressure is applied we can show it down.
 
If anyone out there still subscribes to the liberal rag known as Newsday, then you probably saw yesterday's predictable BS article about the huge local economic boom due to the Offshore Wind industry. Obviously the "environmental terrorists" believe they can pay off enough people to push this stuff through no matter how much we protest.

I am usually watching all this stuff pretty carefully, but one comment and particular statement really caught my eye. They were documenting the Port Jeff based boat from Miller Marine doing bottom surveys that started last year to explore where in the Sound they want to locate the electrical transmission cables. Supposedly these cables will be coming from the soon to be built Beacon 1 Wind farm. These turbines will be located 60 miles east of Montauk and 20 miles south of Nantucket! That is another 20 miles east of the South Fork Wind Farm being constructed on Coxes Ledge.!

Aside from the ridiculous length of this cable there was another statement that had an ominous sound to it. They talked about surveying the bottom not only for location of the cable but also "wind farm foundations"!! This could be interpreted several ways, but it sounds an awful lot like they want to locate some Wind Turbines in the Sound as well in the future. First hint I am getting of the next insane idea.
 
📱 Fish Smarter with the NYAngler App!
Launch Now

Fishing Reports

Latest articles

Back
Top